02/08/2022
Uterine prolapse can occur at the same time as prolapse of the anterior or posterior va**nal compartments
Little is known about the prevalence and natural progression of prolapse
Initially, patients should be assessed and managed conservatively in primary care
Conservative management is advised for patients who are not fit for surgery or do not want surgery
Surgical treatment for uterine prolapse should incorporate procedures to prevent recurrence
Reliable evidence for both conservative and surgical treatment options is lacking, but randomised trials are under way
Go to:
How common is uterine prolapse?
The exact prevalence is unknown. Forty per cent of participants in the women's health initiative (WHI) trial in the United States had some degree of prolapse. Uterine prolapse was found in 14% of the 27 342 women enrolled in the study.3 Another US study of 149 554 women found an 11% lifetime risk of surgery for prolapse or incontinence in the United States.4
The Oxford Family Planning Association study in the United Kingdom followed more than 17 000 women aged 25-39.5 The annual incidence of hospital admission with prolapse was 20.4/10 000, and the annual incidence of surgery for prolapse was 16.2/10 000. Many studies do not distinguish between prolapse of all pelvic organs and prolapse of the uterus alone, which makes it difficult to determine the true incidence.
Four hundred and twelve women originally enrolled in the WHI study were followed up to assess progression of prolapse. Spontaneous regression was common, especially for grade 1 prolapse—the progression rate was 1.9/100 women years and the regression rate was 48/100 women years.6 Thus, prolapse is not always progressive.