Abstract/Description
This study attempted to investigate the beef cattle production system and opportunities for market orientation in southern Ethiopia, Borena Zone. The specific objectives of the study were to characterize cattle production systems, assessment of marketing systems, assess seasonality of domestic cattle meat consumption; and assess potentials and constraints of export abattoirs i
n Ethiopia. To achieve these objectives, secondary and primary data were used. Export abattoirs, producers, and butcheries interview were sources of primary data. Export abattoirs survey was undertaken on ELFORA Agro- Industries PLC and LUNA export slaughter house PLC. Producers’ survey was done the pastoral areas of Borana Zone of Oromiya Regional State in three Pastoral Associations (PAs) and these were Surupha, Dida Yabello and Dubluk. Producers from each PA were selected using Proportional Probability to Size (PPS) approach for each PA. A total of 150 producers were selected based on the number of households in the PAs. To see the marketing system, four markets were covered from Borena pastoral area (Surupha, Haro Beke, Yabelo, and Dubluk). Butcheries survey was done on the purposively selected areas and these were Kara, Sululta, Dukem and Burayu. Butchery’s from each direction of Addis Ababa were selected using Proportional Probability to Size (PPS). A total of 50 butcheries were selected based on their availability in each of the four areas. To see the seasonality of cattle meat consumption, slaughterhouses which give services to the respective butcheries were covered. According to results of the study, 52.7% of the herd owners keep beef cattle to generate cash income and farming purposes. The major feed resources for 147 (98.6%) of the respondents rely on grass from grazing as a basal feed for their cattle, out of which 54 (36.2%) of them used salt as a supplement. Deep wells are the major sources of water in the study areas. According to the sample households the constraints to cattle production system were shortage of grazing land, water, disease, lack of technical supports, lack of security, labor shortage and conflict. Regarding the market information sources, the majority of the respondents 138 (92%), got market information before they went out to sell their cattle. However, the major sources of market information in the study area were informal. Technical supports on cattle marketing issues were obtained from development/extension agents. For 63.3% of the respondents, the determination of the price at the market places were through negotiation between the sellers/producers and the buyers. About 33% (N=149) of the respondents stated that cattle prices increase during the rainy (wet) seasons, mostly from July to August. The major reasons for the cattle price variation across months/seasons as stated by 114 (76.5 %) of the respondents were the seasonal feed and water availability. The major countries that import beef from Ethiopia are Yemen, Egypt, Congo Brazzaville and Cote D’Ivoire, and the export of beef cattle were either in the form of live or processed meat (chilled or frozen carcass). Thus breed, s*x, age, weight and sometimes color of the animal for the live export are the major criteria considered by the live animal exporters xix and export abattoirs during purchase. The major constraints of the export abattoirs were frequent occurrence of livestock diseases, feed and water shortage along export trade routes, market intelligence and transportation. About 84% of the butcheries purchase beef cattle for slaughtering and retailing meat in their butchers. On average, carcass weight of 143.33 ± 5.27 (Mean ± SE) kilogram per head was reported by butcheries, the selling price of a kilogram of beef was 19.36 ± 0.423 ETB (Mean ± SE). However, the price of meat were significantly (P≤ 0.05) higher 26.00 ±2.041 (Mean ± SE) at Dukem and cattle meat yield were significantly (P≤ 0.05) higher 164.00 ± 8.95 (Mean ± SE) at Kara as compared to the other locations. The low demand periods for cattle meat correspond with the period of religious fasting periods by the Ethiopian Orthodox Church followers, the slaughter houses cease or minimize their services due to the fact that butcheries stop ordering cattle slaughter services. The constraints of the butcheries were high tax rates, slaughterhouses problems, high price of cattle at the markets and the illegal backyard slaughtering practices. The overall finding of the study underlined the high importance of institutional support in the areas of market oriented cattle production system, market extension, animal health services and range development in the pastoral area, development of export abattoirs facilities, reducing multiple taxes. Therefore, development interventions should give emphasis to improvement of such institutional support system between exporters, butchers and producers, so as to achieve income to these market actors.Abstract/Description
Study was conducted to assess beef cattle production, management practices and marketing system in Lume district, East Shoa Zone, Oromia. Traditional, semi-intensive and intensive beef cattle production and marketing system were considered for the study. For this purpose 120 respondents were included based on discussions with district livestock experts, 1 kebele for intensive; 2 kebeles from semi-intensive fattening systems were purposively selected as they are the only kebeles practicing intensive and semi-intensive fattening in the district. From the traditional system, three kebeles were randomly selected. Structured and semi-structured questioners were used to collect data from sampled households. In addition the performance of beef animals and chemical composition of major feedstuff were evaluated on eleven purposively selected feedlots and households (2 intensive feed lots, 3 semi-intensive and 6 from traditional). Major feed resources used from the 11 households involved in body weight monitoring were collected and chemical composition determined. From the interviewed households, 100%, 85%, 75%, 63%, and 55% of them use crop residues, aftermath grazing, grazing from communal, roadside and riverside areas, respectively. The majority of the respondents (82.5%) provided additional supplement for their cattle during dry season. Traditional fatteners commonly used noug cake (72.2%) and local brewery by-product (70%) as the main sources of feed. During wet season the major feed resources was grazing (76.3%) while during the dry seasons, tethering (49.1%, free grazing (41.6%) and cut and carry system (1.6%) were the main feed resources. The majority (82.5%) of the farmers supplement cattle during dry season which was provided once a day (44.2%), twice a day (21.7%) and whenever available (34.2%).Traditional fatteners mainly use their own animal for fattening from their herds. The semi-intensive and intensive fatteners purchase fattening animals from another source. The most preferred animal for fattening was old oxen (56.7%) in the traditional fattening system while young bull (20.8%) was used in semi- commercial and intensive fatteners. Cattle were fattened once, twice and trice a year under traditional, semi-intensive, intensive production systems, respectively. In all production systems, decision of ending fattening period was made based on live weight change. The average length of fattening period was 3-4, 3, 3 months for traditional, semi-intensive and intensive system, respectively. At the market places, the main buyers of beef cattle were local traders (74.2%) in traditional and semi-intensive systems. According to the respondents, reasons for prices variation were involvement of number of traders (75.8%), road and transportation accessibility (15%) and proximity to urban (9.2%) places. The determinants of price of animals (purchased/sold) were breed (29.2%), weight (28.3%), and color (26.7%) and age (15%). The majority of the producers (95.4%) in traditional fattening system and semixviii intensive fatteners (100%) sold their fattened cattle in eye ball estimation at market place, while fatteners in intensive system used live weight to sell their cattle. The majority of the respondents (55%) relay on the information they get from brokers. More than three-fourth of the fatteners in all production systems sell their fattened beef (100%) during holidays. The crude protein content of the feedstuff ranged from 3.79 to 29%. The average daily gain increased (P