Pegasus Dog Psychology and Training

Pegasus Dog Psychology and Training Companion Dog Training
Puppy 1 & 2 Training - How to teach your puppy how to live in harmony w

Companion Dog Training
Puppy 1 and 2 Training - How to teach your puppy how to live in harmony with you
Adult 1 and 2 Training - How to problem solve common problems
1-1 training for reactive dogs, or nervous dogs

I'm king of the hilltop and now I'm looking for squidgels
18/08/2024

I'm king of the hilltop and now I'm looking for squidgels

yup. like him or loathe him farage is not the problem. mass uncontrolled immegration is.
18/08/2024

yup. like him or loathe him farage is not the problem.
mass uncontrolled immegration is.

Ever since riots and protests erupted on England’s streets, much of the elite class has blamed just one man —Nigel Farage.

After releasing a video during the early days of the unrest, in which Nigel Farage suggested, in reference to the person who murdered three little girls, “the truth is being withheld from us”, the leader of the Reform party has come under intense fire.

One after another, broadcasters, celebrities, comedians, and politicians have lined-up to brand the unrest the “Farage riots”, denouncing the politician.

Former head of Counter-Terrorism policing, Neil Basu, suggests that Farage’s social media activity could be investigated for “inciting” rioting.

A former intelligence officer at MI5 says the security services “may” widen an investigation into Tommy Robinson to include the democratically elected MP.

The Times newspaper included Farage, alongside Robinson, in a “rogues gallery” of figures it claims were “fanning the flames of violence”.

And, this week, columnist Trevor Phillips suggested that Farage is “enabling” the politics of the English Defence League, which “is in some ways worse than the conduct of the out-and-out racists”.

Remarkably, he even suggests that Farage belongs in Dante’s eighth circle of Hell, for “exploiting the passions of others to serve their own interests”.

And that’s not all.

Conservative Party leadership hopefuls, who at the election last month were forced to watch Nigel Farage capture one-quarter of their votes, have also been very critical.

Priti Patel has criticised Farage for comparing the latest riots to the Black Lives Matter protests. Tom Tugendhat attacked his “reckless rhetoric”. James Cleverly told Farage to choose between being a “politician or content creator”. And Mel Stride said his comments about the riots were “wrong and misguided”.

Then, last weekend, hundreds of “anti-racism” activists descended on what they thought was the Reform party’s headquarters, in London, to accuse Farage of directly causing the unrest that has swept through England.

Sorry, but am I the only one who finds all this ridiculous? Am I the only one who smells hypocrisy? And am I the only one who finds all this utterly outrageous?

Look, the reality is this. Like him or loathe him, Nigel Farage has been one of the few voices in British politics who has consistently warned about what would happen if the country did not reduce legal immigration and control its own borders.

You don’t have to agree with his politics or like the man to accept this is true.

Under both New Labour and Tory governments, Farage was the only consistent voice on this, warning, in the face of much vitriol, that spiralling levels of immigration, the transfer of legal powers to international courts, and a broken policy of multiculturalism would soon give rise to the very things we saw playing out on England’s streets last week —social tension, ethnic conflict, sectarianism.

And now, the very people from the elite class that spent the last thirty years ushering in these disastrous policies, including the extreme policy of mass immigration, are blaming Farage. Much like we saw in the aftermath of Brexit, with Vladimir Putin, Cambridge Analytica, and Dominic Cummings, the elite class is smothering itself in a comfort blanket, pointing at a bogeyman rather than reflecting on its own actions.

It wasn’t Farage who decimated the very communities that saw the worst rioting last week by ushering in policies like hyper-globalisation, mass immigration, and deindustrialisation; it was the elite class.

It wasn’t Nigel Farage who at one election after another promised the British people they would lower immigration only to then do the very opposite, essentially gaslighting, lying, and betraying voters; it was the elite class.

It wasn’t Nigel Farage who promised over and over again that the British people would “Take Back Control” of their own borders only to then completely lose control of them, allowing an assortment of illegal migrants and criminals into the country; it was the elite class.

It wasn’t Nigel Farage who consistently ignored, in towns like Rotherham, which saw the worst rioting last week, the industrial-scale r**e and s*xual exploitation of young white, working-class girls at the hands of Muslim gangs while deriding anybody who did dare point to it as a “racist”; it was the elite class.

It wasn’t Nigel Farage who promised the very communities that were rioting last week they would be “levelled-up” only to then rapidly lose interest when it turned out “levelling-up” is difficult and unpopular among south voters; it was the elite class.

And it wasn’t Nigel Farage who spent years after the democratic vote for Brexit fuelling this profound anger and alienation by publicly deriding and dismissing the white working-class as “racists”, “gammons”, and “bigots”; it was the elite class.

But now, the very same people, the very ones who presided over these disastrous decisions, have the sheer audacity to not only ignore how their policies set the stage for the unrest but blame everything on the one man who warned this would happen.

It was a similar story at the election, last month. It wasn’t Farage who manipulated and pushed millions of voters into supporting Reform. It was a natural reaction to an elite class that spans politics, media, and culture that too often looks insular, remote, narcissistic, more interested in itself than the rest of the country.

Farage and Reform, as new research on the election shows, won over millions of voters who are utterly frustrated and fed-up with the broken status-quo, who desperately want an alternative to the failed policies of the established Left and Right.

The top two concerns for Farage’s voters? Stop the boats and lower immigration. And no, they are not fringe concerns. Immigration is back to being the most important issue for ALL voters, because the elite class, not Farage, has made such a hash of it.

While they blame Farage, the fact of the matter is that he’s not just tapping into a radical minority but is much more in tune with the country than the likes of James O’Brien and Anna Soubry, who spend their lives sitting on Twitter/X, blaming Farage for everything and anything that goes wrong in Britain.

Farage, furthermore, is also tapping into other issues that he did not create but which the elite class has managed disastrously, like multiculturalism. While elites repeat in robotic fashion “multiculturalism is a success”, when British people looked at their television screens last week and saw minorities waving the Palestine flag rather than the Union Jack, and Muslims screaming “Allahu Akbar!” on the streets of England, the fashionable claim that multiculturalism is bringing us together, not highlighting our differences, is no longer convincing.

Indeed, more than than three-quarters of the people who voted for Farage last month, 78%, think multiculturalism is making life in Britain worse, not better. And nor is this a fringe view. According to the think-tank More In Common, in the aftermath of the rioting and protests, not even half of all British people can bring themselves to say they are “proud” Britain is a multi-ethnic society. Only 48% feel this way, which drops to 39% for Conservatives and just 20% for Farage’s voters. This is not exactly a ringing endorsement of a policy that is pushing people apart, not bringing them together.

And then comes crime, disorder, and the general sense of lawlessness that is sweeping across the country. Once again, while the elite class blame Farage, it was not he who pushed for soft-on-crime policies, failed to build enough prisons, and was forced to let criminals walk free because of these longer-term failures; that was all the elite class.

This is why Farage has been winning over voters who, as the research shows, think court sentences are too soft, illegal migrants should be immediately removed from the country, young people do not have enough respect for traditional British values, welfare benefits are too generous, and that perhaps even the death penalty should be restored for some crimes. In this way, again, he is tapping into the failures of the elite class; their failure to maintain law and order, their failure to keep criminals in prison, their failure to fix the borders, their failure to deport foreign criminals who should not be in the country, their failure to keep the British people safe.

As Elon Musk said during his conversation with Donald Trump this week, the blunt reality is that a country which cannot control its own borders is no longer a country. And this is exactly how many British people feel; that because of the ongoing failures of the elite class they are losing their country. And while the elite class blame Farage, he is ultimately the only politician who has realised his and is speaking to it.

Farage, too, is winning over people who have become instinctively suspicious if not hostile toward the elite’s obsession with woke ideology, a project that many people see as being completely divorced from reality and the everyday concerns of ordinary people. While most Reform voters support same-s*x marriage, they also think rights for transgender people have gone too far and that, on balance, people should not be allowed to “change gender”. They are sick and tired of being lectured to by a morally righteous elite class, which prioritises fashionable dogma over biological reality.

The elite class blame Farage for spreading “misinformation” but they the ones who have been trying to convince us that boys can become girls and girls can become boys, that pregnant women are “pregnant persons”, and that anybody who thinks otherwise should be shut down and stigmatised as a closed-minded “bigot” and “transphobe”. Until Dr Hilary Cass came along with her detailed review, Farage was one of only a handful of politicians willing to call out this nonsense. The elite class didn’t.

And when it comes to economics, too, the elite class blame Farage for all that is wrong but, once again, if you look at his voters you will see he is winning over the very people who were completely shafted by the economic policies of the elite class, by their unflinching embrace of hyper-globalisation and large corporations that use cheap immigrant labour to keep profits high, costs low, and undercut the wages, working conditions, and dignity of working-class voters in Western economies.

Farage’s voters are not yearning for a return to Thatcherism but are economically populist. Most of them, often working-class, without degrees, think rich people get around the law too easily, and that rich people should be taxed more, not less. Most think big business, global corporations, and multinationals exploit workers. And most think workers are not getting their fair share of the nation’s wealth.

The key point is that these are the very people who were completely screwed by the economic model of the last thirty years: London-centric, too dependent on financial services, too focused on the graduate middle-class, too obsessed with helping the rich and big business, too addicted to mass, low-skill immigration, and too disinterested in the people who live, work, and struggle outside the M25.

Most are closer to Donald Trump’s “patriotic protectionism” than Thatcherism —they want an economy that’s not organised around redistribution but policies that tilt the deck back toward the British people, British communities, and British firms, against globalist corporations that care more about profit than the national community, and foreign powers like China. They want, in short, the principle of national preference, putting British people before others, to be embedded into our economy.

This is why, as Lord Ashcroft’s research shows, Reform voters are the most likely of all to think that globalisation has been a “force for ill” because, in short, they’ve been the most likely to have been swept aside by it, to have watched their communities and way of life be completely battered by crony capitalism, mass immigration, and a remote elite class that puts business before people. Farage might not have leaned into this as fully as he could but he has recognised it, using his first speech in parliament to call out large multinationals that don’t care about ordinary people.

As I wrote last year, while launching the first major study of Nigel Farage’s Reform voters right here on this Substack:

“Many Reform voters clearly feel their leaders are more interested in prioritising global corporations over the national community and economy. In this respect, Reform is making most inroads among “national conservatives” —voters who simultaneously feel strongly concerned about immigration and the erosion of their national community and who worry, deeply, about how global corporations and big business are contributing to this, not least by demanding cheap migrant labour to keep their costs low and profits high, irrespective of what this means for the surrounding national community and British workers.”

And, lastly, this is also why these people not only flocked to Farage and abandoned the elite class but think differently about last week’s riots and the protests. Consistently, while most Reformers, like most Brits, distance themselves from violence, they are the most likely to express sympathy for people protesting peacefully, with 83% of Farage’s voters feeling this way compared to 58% among all voters, and to say the protestors have “legitimate concerns”, which more than half of them do.

Clearly, having been angered and alienated by the elite class for decades, having watched their communities and country be overturned, having watched the Black Lives Matter protestors reshape the national conversation through rioting and protests, and having got nowhere themselves with the ballot box, a significant number of Farage’s voters clearly think that peaceful protestors have a point, that perhaps this is the only way of reminding a deaf system that both they and their concerns exist.

Either way, the key point in all this is that while much of the political, media, and cultural class continue rant and rave about Farage, blaming him for everything that just erupted on England’s streets, they are misguided and wrong.

It is the failures of the elite class, more than anything Nigel Farage said or did, that have created this unrest. And it is these failures that allowed Farage to mobilise a unique coalition of voters who are culturally conservative and economically populist —who yearn for national protection from mass immigration, radical Islamism, and broken borders, cultural protection from a divisive and unBritish woke ideology, and economic protection from what many of them see as irresponsible, selfish, globalist corporations that do not really care about their national community.

This is why, as the riots and protests finally died down, Nigel Farage returned to social media to point to new polling, which suggested that, for the first time since the Brexit referendum, in 2016, immigration is once again the top issue in the country.

“The public have woken up and want the kind of action that Labour and the Tories will never deliver”, tweeted Farage. “This is why politicians and the media are falsely accusing me of being involved in the riots”.

And you know what?

He has a point.

yup. and when labour give them the vote we will become a sharia law country. also more anti Jewish rhetoric around. I'm ...
18/08/2024

yup. and when labour give them the vote we will become a sharia law country.
also more anti Jewish rhetoric around.
I'm so sad for our country and the females of the net generation.they deserve better.

Earlier this year, I asked an anonymous, right-leaning member of Generation-Z to write a column on how they see the state of our politics and country. That column, written by somebody in their twenties, went viral and subsequent pieces by Anonymous Zoomer are among our most read to date. For that reason, I asked them to keep writing for us on a regular basis. I will never reveal their true identity.

Here are five things that happened in the UK and Ireland over the last six months.

First, in January 2024, an Afghan asylum-seeker named Abdul Ezedi threw acid on a mother and her two children, leaving them with ‘life-changing’ injuries. A few years earlier, Ezedi had been convicted of s*xual assault and exposing himself. He was placed on the s*x offender register for ten years. In 2020, after ‘converting’ to Christianity, a vicar testified for his asylum, which he was granted.

Second, in March 2024, a criminal gang led by Syrian brothers Omar and Mohamed Badreddin was prosecuted for grooming and ra**ng a 13-year-old girl. The girl was r**ed repeatedly in her own home by the brothers, who moved to the UK as Syrian refugees. The girl was “groomed” with alcohol and ci******es.

Third, in April 2024, asylum seeker Anicet Mayela pleaded guilty to ra**ng a 15 year old girl in Oxford. Mayela, who had once campaigned outside a detention centre with a sign that read “migrants are not criminals”, had arrived in the UK illegally in 2004. He was due to be deported back to Congo a year later, but members of a cabin crew, who opposed the deportation, stopped the plane from taking off.

Fourth, last month, in July 2024, a 33-year-old male asylum seeker, who could not speak English, was charged with ra**ng a woman at a leisure centre in Ennis, Ireland.

And then, also last month, asylum-seeker Adel Kerai was jailed after s*xually assaulting a woman in public, who he had followed around Dublin city centre for thirty minutes. Kerai had only arrived five days earlier from Algeria, where he said he was being discriminated against because of his political beliefs.

What do all these things have in common, aside from having all taken place this year? They are horrific crimes that were committed against women and girls by men who are accustomed to s*x-segregated societies, in which there is one rule for men and another rule for women —rules which oppress and objectify young women like me.

These men, put simply, do not subscribe to British values, which champion equality of opportunity between the s*xes. And they clearly do not respect our way of life.

Most people in Britain champion these things —I know that most of my friends in Gen-Z certainly do. We are the most liberal generation in history, especially young women who over the last decade have been moving sharply to the cultural left.

We believe, passionately, that women have the same rights as men. We can wear what we like. And we can aspire to do what we like. Britain, in short, should be one of the best places in the world to be a woman.

But this ideal is now under threat. Why?

Because our extreme policy of mass immigration has brought with it a minority of men who have a forceful and very particular contempt for women.

The simple fact is that ongoing mass immigration from mainly Muslim countries is threatening the hard-won rights of women in Western liberal societies.

As others note, over the last fifteen years, nearly 4 million people have entered Europe illegally. Two-thirds of them were men and around 80% of all applicants for asylum were aged under 35 years old. Most came from Muslim states that have very different cultural values, attitudes, and ways of life to our own.

It should not be controversial to point out this basic fact. We should be able to talk openly and candidly about it.

And it’s a similar story in Britain.

Since 2018, the vast majority of the more than 131,000 people who have entered the country illegally, on small boats, are young men from predominantly Muslim countries, like Afghanistan, Bangladesh, and Pakistan.

Many of these asylum-seekers, obviously, reject violence and criminality. But it is also true that a significant number do not. Why do I say this?

Because, like those cases I mentioned above, there are now simply too many instances of asylum-seekers and illegal migrants s*xually assaulting and ra**ng women.

As a young woman who recently moved to London, I can tell you —I’m scared. And so too are many of my young female friends —even if they dare not voice their fears because they will be branded “racist” or “Islamophobic”.

There is now a low-level culture of oppression and intimidation, which we experience on an almost daily basis, on things like public transport and while walking through the most highly diverse neighbourhoods of our capital city.

And we are furious; furious because the elite class is not even willing to talk about it.

Every time another horrific s*xual attack on a woman is splashed across the news, everyone – from politicians to police – appear genuinely shocked.

They lay wreaths and flowers. They condemn the violence. But they then do absolutely nothing to confront the nature of the challenge.

One of the only people who has spoken openly about this problem is scholar Ayaan Hirsi Ali, originally from Somalia, who herself received asylum in the Netherlands.

Her book Prey: Immigration, Islam, and the Erosion of Women’s Rights, is perhaps the only one in recent years to pull back the curtain to discuss this problem openly.

Hirsi Ali argues, convincingly, that not only have women in Europe faced a barrage of s*xual harassment, r**e and violence since the start of the migration crisis, in 2015, but now also have to navigate the “be kind” klaxon among liberals, whereby the elite class refuse to acknowledge the problem because of fears of being seen as “racist”.

In her own words, Ayaan Hirsi Ali writes:

“Talking about violence by Muslim men against European women is at odds with identity politics and its matrix of victimhood. Politicians, journalists and academics have been reluctant to acknowledge that the migrant s*x-crime wave even exists. This is as much an issue of class as religion or race. Much of the crime and misconduct against women takes place in low-income neighbourhoods. Somehow in the era of , their predicament arouses less sympathy than that of Hollywood actresses.”

The problem for the elite class is that there have been times when the problem has simply become unavoidable, when it has forced its way into media headlines.

Such as the wave of s*xual assaults on New Year’s Eve in Germany, nearly a decade ago —an event my friends and I followed on social media and found utterly shocking.

As Ayaan Hirsi Ali notes, according to German police more than 1,200 women were assaulted, of whom 24 were r**ed.

Repeating what they call “the r**e game” from their home countries, perpetrators operated in gangs, forcing women into concentric circles, and then ra**ng them.

Of the 153 suspects in the city of Cologne, nearly all were foreign, including 103 from Morocco and Algeria. Sixty-eight were asylum seekers.

How exceptional was this?

It’s difficult to know because, as Ayaan Hirsi Ali notes, many governments in the West are now also working overtime to try and conceal data on the race and ethnicity of people who commit these crimes in their countries.

In Britain, for example, this data is simply not made available.

For young women like me, this is infuriating. If you don’t want people spreading “misinformation” then how about you start by making information available?

What are you scared of?

In the academic literature, too, the vast majority of studies that do exist look mainly at the impact of s*xual violence on female asylum-seekers and migrants, rather than the impact on women in the receiving countries, which tells you a lot about the liberal bias that exists within the social sciences and humanities —they don’t want to look.

This makes it difficult to build a reliable picture of what’s going on.

But there have been some notable exceptions, almost all of which, like those examples above, suggest we have a major problem, albeit one that liberals routinely ignore.

Like the study which found that while an influx of refugees is not immediately followed by a surge in crime this does tend to follow one year later, including an upsurge of property crime and violent crime.

Or like the study of the Greek islands, which found that a 1-point increase in the share of refugees on the islands, compared to islands that did not receive any refugees, increased rates of crime —especially property crime, knife attacks, and r**es.

Or like the example of Denmark, as Ayaan Hirsi Ali notes.

“Denmark is unusual for making it relatively easy to distinguish immigrant offenders. Since 2015, the country’s share of immigrants from “non-Western countries,” excluding their Danish-born descendants, has risen from around 5% to 6%. Yet from 2015 to 2019 they have accounted for around 11% of convictions for s*x offenses and 34% of convictions for r**e.”

Or worrying data from Germany:

“… in 2017 and 2018, more than a third of the suspects … were non-Germans. For all s*xual-abuse cases, the share of non-German suspects rose from 15% in 2014 to 23% in 2016, 2017 and 2018, and 21% in 2019 … In Germany’s crime statistics, the term zuwanderer, or “newcomers,” was used until 2016 to identify suspects who were asylum applicants, failed asylum seekers and illegal residents. This definition was expanded in 2017 to include successful asylum seekers. From 2017 to 2019, zuwanderer accounted for between 10% and 12% of s*x-crime suspects, and around 16% of suspects for r**e, s*xual coercion and s*xual assault in especially serious cases. It is unlikely zuwanderer accounted for much more than 2% of the population”

Or data from Austria:

“crimes or offenses against s*xual integrity and self-determination increased by 53% between 2015 and 2018. Between a quarter and a third of suspects were foreign, but in 2018 only 19.4% of the population was foreign-born. Between 4% and 11% of the suspects were asylum seekers; the share of the population born in Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria—among the largest sources of asylum seekers—was only 1.2%”

Or Sweden:

“In the absence of official statistics, the Swedish newspaper Aftonbladet reviewed the gang-r**e cases heard in Swedish courts between July 2012 and December 2017. Of the 112 men convicted, it found that three-quarters were foreign-born (almost all of those from outside Europe), and 30% were asylum seekers.”

Or Britain, where the tendency to downplay or ignore this issue was reflected in the appalling “grooming scandal”, which involved the industrial-scale r**e and s*xual abuse of thousands of young white girls by Pakistani men.

As Matt Goodwin has written on this Substack:

“The grooming scandal paints a very different picture of modern Britain —a place where members of a minority group oppress and exploit children from the majority, and where white liberals clearly have no interest in coming to save them.

From Rotherham to Telford, Oldham to Rochdale, Oxford to Peterborough, it’s the same story —social workers, councillors, teachers, politicians, and police ignoring or downplaying the scandal because of fears of being called ‘racist’, because they did not believe it, or because members of their community were implicated.

From one town to the next, the desire to not violate anti-racism taboos, to not be seen as politically correct and to conform to the elite consensus was routinely prioritised above ensuring the safety of children and, ultimately, upholding the law.

There has been widespread discussion about the fact that these crimes were not investigated because the police were concerned they would be accused of being “racists” if they were honest about the ethnicity of the male perpetrators.”

As a recent female graduate of one of the most elite universities in the country, my friends and I have listened to more talks on consent and “toxic masculinity” than most people have had hot dinners.

But, sadly, I know, as many of my friends do, that violence, including s*xual violence, against women and girls in Western democracies is now a huge issue.

Yet not one of my university professors or workshops ever addressed the enormous elephant in the room, which now faces women like me across the West.

This is the fact that many crimes are perpetrated by a specific demographic: male asylum seeker, often Muslim, who in the left’s identity politics matrix get a free pass.

We spent much of the last decade talking about the “ ” movement. But today, shockingly, nobody in the elite class wants to talk about how mass immigration and illegal migration are undermining the rights of women and girls like me.

I don’t want to be called a “racist” or “Islamophobe” for pointing out the truth that’s staring us all in the face, that’s staring young women like me in the face.

And I don’t want to have to write an anonymous blog to be able to talk about these things —I should be able to say them out loud, and join a national debate.

The established class, on both Left and Right, have let me and my female peers down.

We have a right to feel safe in our own country.

The only question I would ask members of that elite class is this.

Are you even listening?

And do you even care?

anyone fancy a 3 night hol in folly 1 in s Devon. dates sat 14th Sept to tue 17th Sept.? let me know?
15/08/2024

anyone fancy a 3 night hol in folly 1 in s Devon. dates sat 14th Sept to tue 17th Sept.? let me know?

Dino and luca. best mates for ever. luca we loved having you to holiday with us. xx
12/08/2024

Dino and luca. best mates for ever. luca we loved having you to holiday with us. xx

and our previous boarder with dino. she's called flossie. and is a real cutie pie.
12/08/2024

and our previous boarder with dino. she's called flossie. and is a real cutie pie.

Dino with his best mate luca who went home yesterday after coming for a hol with us. this is them in the morning whrn I ...
12/08/2024

Dino with his best mate luca who went home yesterday after coming for a hol with us. this is them in the morning whrn I get up.

yup. Just sad.
05/08/2024

yup. Just sad.

yup. this. sad.
05/08/2024

yup. this. sad.

yup. labour want to blame farage as its convenient even if completely untrue. at least another mp can see this. farage h...
05/08/2024

yup. labour want to blame farage as its convenient even if completely untrue. at least another mp can see this.
farage has stated in writing and media he is anti violence and that is not the answer. he has called for parliament to be recalled but it's farc easier for starmer to blame him instead.
starmer needs to step up as pm. take control. understand that people ae feeling frightened and worried about what's happening. and reassure people not just state he will protect Muslims and call everyone far right.
his job is to keep the entire UK safe. that's everyone including but not excusivly Muslims.

Address

Ormsby House, Court Grange
Abbotskerswell
TQ125NH

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Pegasus Dog Psychology and Training posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to Pegasus Dog Psychology and Training:

Videos

Share