15/12/2024
We all have different views on this but I completely agree this is a deep concern for those of us not wanting to ingest the addictive.
Just look at the supermarkets & how much Arla milk is stacked on the shelves 💪🏻
More concerning is this additive creating disease in cows & we then ingest the meat and of course our pets. We have choices to become vegetarians or vegans but for our cats and dogs they eat meat. It’s tricky 🤷♀️
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1AeNjL13rB/?mibextid=WC7FNe
WILL BOVAER MAKE ITS WAY INTO RAW DOG FOOD IN THE UK?
Bovaer is a new feed additive that can potentially reduce methane emissions from dairy cows by purportedly 30%, on average, and it has just received the green light as a feed additive in the UK.
The public isn't happy, though. Spooked by the ever-increasing volume of nasty chemicals that sneak into our ultra-processed food chain, all of which were GRAS at one point and now we wish we never invented - from hydrogenated fats, toxic preservatives food dyes and artificial sweeteners like aspartame in the products to themselves to antibiotics, angel dust, chlorine and glyphosate used in production - we look back on all this horrible s**t poisoning our kids and our environment and wish we could all eat "organic", aka, normal food, free of the toxic soup.
Are we simply lurching to the next patented, ultra-profitable, chemical sticking plaster for our broken ultra-processed food system?
Bovaer, made of silicon dioxide, propylene glycol and organic compound 3-nitrooxypropanol (known as 3-NOP), works by suppressing the enzyme in a cow’s stomach that produces methane. By doing so, less methane is produced in a cow’s stomach.
You would think the public has every right to be concerned. What is this food additive that suddenly, apparently, reduces methane from cows? How did they test it? Are these cows fed grain (high methane omissions, thick black smoke coming out of the exhaust of a struggling car) or normal cows (grass-fed, happy, where methane emissions are significantly reduced). Is it just dairy or meat? Give us a look at the human data. Who's behind the product? That matters as companies like Monsanto (glyphosate) have truly despicable reputations. And, as ever, there's the whole carbon / climate thing.
The UK government, however, who never, ever get anything wrong and try and cover it up later (post office, blood scandal, Covid response), believes it is. As ever, there is no debate, there is only mandate. They want it that by 2030 ALL British cattle will be given this methane-reducing chemical Bovaer daily in their feed.
Arla Foods are already on board, agreeing to trial the use of Bovaer in their dairy products which they provide to Tesco, Morissons and Aldi in the UK.
Australia, Brazil and Canada are now also on board. We Irish are looking into it too, far be it from us to buck a trend. It's interesting to note however that when we trialled it, we found that feeding 3-NOP (Bovaer) to lactating dairy cows grazing on grass, it reduced enteric methane by a WHOPPING 5%.
5%.
Hmmm. This reshapes things slightly. For such marginal gains in normal cows (fed grass not grain and kept in fields not concentration camps), the safety-bit would need to be drum-tight.
So, is it? Well, currently they are telling us there is "no side effects in cows".
Isn't that amazing? Completely messing with the cows digestion...and it has ZERO impact on the animal. No health risks at all for her, apparently. It's hard to accept how when only a year ago the Food Standards Agency in the UK had found that 3-NOP “should be considered corrosive to the eyes, a skin irritant and potentially harmful by inhalation” to humans handling it.
https://www. food. gov. uk/research/outcome-of-assessment-of-3-nitrooxypropanol-3-nop-assessment
Better still (for Bovaer shareholders) is that they had a look and it DEFINITELY does not make its way into the meat or milk of the cow either.
However, we're just not sure if this is the same way the mRNA jabs, packed in lipid nanoparticles whose very design means they can get around the body, DEFINITELY DO NOT go around the body so couldn't be causing all the inflammation in all those organs folk were reporting. To suggest it did was, of course, misinformation. Now we know of course they DEFINITELY DO.
We were also told, using zero long-term safety data in humans (with Bovaer there is not even short-term safety data in humans) that said therapies were DEFINITELY SAFE when their previous safety record was the very thing preventing them getting to market prior to their rushed authorisation in 2021. And now, the data is building, greatly reinforcing that earlier stance.
Is Bovaer safe? Who knows. Not me, anyway. I mean, try do a little research, see how you get on with main stream media coverage.
Because on Bovaer, MSM they are all in staunch agreement - it's great.
Not a single dissenting voice.
Every single newspaper outlet labels our concern about this new food additive as "misinformation".
[See attached image of the latest headline from the BBC. Not only is it misinformation for the plebs to grumble but right at the top there is a nice ADVERTISEMENT for a big, in-depth show they're bringing out on why everyone's suddenly getting turbo cancer. You can be SURE they'll get to the bottom of it....!!!].
All of them in agreement.
Again.
I have to admit that makes we worried. In fact, when I see someone say "misinformation, nothing to see here" now I immediately think the opposite!
I mean, it seems the BBC has more concerns about the level of "misinformation" on Steven Bartlett's podcast the Diary of a CEO.
https://www. bbc. co. uk/programmes/m0026q5x
Steven Bartlett? A conspiracy theorist?!! Have you ever listened to the guy? Getting mad at Bartlett, with all due respect to the guy, is akin to shouting at a plain, digestive biscuit. He is the most moderate, left-leaning guy ever. Never posed a contrary view on anything, that I have heard. In fact, he's so middling that folk like me who love digging into matters such as the Covid response or the climate debate or any of the major talking points that us plens are not allowed to talk about, would never consider DCEO as a source of useful information in those respects. It's not his bag. Bartlett loves business, men's (and sometimes women's) health, that sort of thing. On the spicier debates, I always felt he played it safe.
But not safe enough. Now, inevitably, some of his guests are beginning to mention the enormous elephants in the room, including the toxic food supply, mRNA products, if man-made-carbon is as big an issue as it's pained and recently some more natural ways to fight cancer, and you're not allowed to talk about, according to the BBC.
As always - when you're taking flak you know you're over a target.
Lack of MSM interest aside, the question at this point is will this s**t make its way into our raw dog food?
Well, the powers that be say it DEFINITELY won't.
If you're not happy about that, if you want to BE informed, you need to do a little digging. If buying milk in Tesco, Morrisons or Aldi, make sure it's organic. Email your raw dog food supplier. Seek assurances they are not using cattle fed this stuff.
Am I saying boycott the companies involved? No, actually. They will do anything to curry favour with the public. If they think the public want this s**t, they'll use it. If they show they don't, they won't. It's as simple as that.
The only boycott that should be happening here is the biggest bulls**t and methane emitters on the planet - politicians and mainstream media.
