10/01/2024
Welfare is subjective - not a one size fits all approach. And I find this fascinating.
We think about metrics for equine welfare, about their need for friends, freedom and forage, because that will make them happy.
And then we think about the domains model: ample opportunity for species-specific expression, good quality nutrition with varying forages, different environments, horse-centred humans and a healthful life because this level of enrichment should support their mental state.
And then we talk about consent - because consent should make horses happy because they can choose. 'Yes' or 'no' - it's simple...right?
But the thing thats only starting to be talked about is that your horse can have all of the above, but still be unhappy. Because what many horses don't have is agency.
"One's independent capability or ability to act on one's will"
The ability to choose. Because 'yes' or 'no' isn't really a choice. Especially if it's a game you have chosen.
So when we're all up here on social media getting pedantic about right or wrong (and I'm guilty like the rest of them), the thing that we are missing here is the horse's perception.
It isn't kind if your horse doesn't perceive it that way.
So if we're watching the latest FEI competition and the horse is literally grimacing - there's no way we can percieve that to be kind.
And if you get your treeless saddle out because you feel tree'd saddles are cruel, yet your horse hides from you... we can't see that as kind.
Likewise if you're training with treats and your horse offers all the frustrated behaviours because *they just want the darn food*...
Yep you guessed it, it's not kind.
And I understand that there is much more nuance than a hedonistic, instant gratification of "this approach is right vs. this approach is wrong"
But I feel that if we get better at analysing our horses and reading their feelings... we might start making more progress ❤️