11/07/2024
Oh, so many things that were NOT said, that should have been. Obviously the dog should never have been outside without its owner, and in this case also on lead. Obviously the owner needs to be accountable for their negligence in allowing this to happen. HOWEVER, because the press likes clear cut 'goodies' and 'baddies' they are painting this in a certain light... which in my mind is both wrong and unhelpful. They have praised the boy's bravery (and he was) in trying to protect his brother and sister... but I would argue that there is a VERY large chance that his actions of running away to 'distract' the dog were what caused it to attack in the first place. The combination of being outside its house (territory) mixed with a child that is running and trying to get its attention is absolutely going to trigger a chase, grab, bite reaction, which is exactly what happened. The wounds look like one single bite, which would go alongside this theory of a chase, grab, bite sequence. Whilst this is sad and never should have happened, just saying the dog 'attacked with no reason' is both wrong and highly unhelpful in further understanding and potentially preventing these sad cases. Also, stopping irresponsible owners from having these dogs would of course have stopped this happening in the first place, but just blaming the dogs really does not help.
Theo, 11, describes the "terrifying" moment he was attacked while protecting his siblings.