13/06/2025
Few words are getting as much usage and wildly varying interpretations in the current training world.
Whether itâs the PP/FF folks (using it as an incompatible behavior/distraction/bribe to avoid using corrections), or the balanced trainers (many doing precisely the same as the PP/FF, but also looking to impress the cool kids in their training peer groups) , everyone is super keen on talking about the power and value of engagement.
And then thereâs countless other interpretations of engagement I see trainers applying that are actually far more healthy and natural.
So a lot of this is a definitional and catchword issue, and in other instances itâs just incompetent training or trainers fishing for market share or peer love.
As I stated in the graphic, Iâm not at all interested in my dog (or my clientâs dogs) being in some obsessive, fixated, edgy, anxious, unnatural anticipatory âengagementâ state where theyâre constantly staring at the handler and constantly awaiting input about whatâs next.
If youâre working with pet dogs and this sounds good to you for the dog and the client⊠I honestly donât get the disconnect from the observable reality youâre creating, but hey, you do you.
For me, this is the engagement I want: I want a dog who is relaxed, comfortable, natural. I want the dog to be aware of me, and to be 100% responsive to me (when needed â no matter whatâs happening in the environment), but to also be able to simply be a dog and enjoy their world without this wildly unnecessary handler fixation.
The thing is, with proper training, you CAN have a dog who isnât staring at, or every 2 seconds checking in with you â and still have a dog who is 100% reliable, tuned-in, responsive, and not engaging in problem behaviors.
I never teach âlookâ, or âwatchâ, or to heel while looking at me â and we tackle the highest degree of reactivity on the regular. I also donât teach the dog to be in a sit or down or place and be biting their nails awaiting the next command â and yet theyâre perfectly responsive. I also donât teach off-leash dogs they have circle back and check-in every 5 seconds â and yet these dogs recall off of any distraction on a dime every time.
Iâm not trying to start a beef with the majority of the training community, Iâm simply offering another opinion in regards to what might be best for pet dogs. If youâre working on more complex stuff for fun, sport, or even competition, then thatâs a whole ânother conversation. But unfortunately, weâve taken things that work exceptionally well for certain purposes and forced them onto regular owners with regular dogs â neither of which are served by this stuff.
So many complain about not wanting ârobotâ dogs, and yet so many in all the different camps of training (for all the varied reasons listed above) are doing precisely that to pet dogs. Theyâre removing the magic of a healthy, connected, natural co-existence, and the joy of letting dogs be dogs (the joy for both species), and creating these unnatural, edgy, anxious dogs who might look good in a superficial performative fashion, but who mentally are the furthest thing from good.