Eden's Holistic Veterinary Team

10/28/2024

This handsome fella, Cooper, came in for a consultation and Zyto biofeedback.

10/28/2024

Keep your pets safe by being aware of common household hazards! 🍫 Chocolate, certain plants like lilies, and cleaning supplies can be dangerous. Synthetic fragrances are very harmful to pets. At Eden's Holistic Veterinary Team, we're here to guide you in safeguarding your furry family members! 🐾

09/25/2024

Artificial fragrances can be toxic to dogs. Here's a look at what fragrances are bad for dogs and safe alternatives.

09/23/2024

I Love Dog ......!
Dᴏɢ
ᴅᴏglᴏveʀ

09/20/2024

I Love Dog ......!
Dᴏg
ᴅᴏglovᴇʀ

09/16/2024

We have good VOC’s and we have bad VOC’s.

“The common organic compounds found in our homes have many known health-damaging effects, even in low levels. While many have the potential to cause emotional disturbances (a depressed central nervous system resulting in low energy, depression, and decreased appetite) in our animals, it is the mutagenic (mutation-causing), teratogenic (fetal damage-causing), and carcinogenic (cancer-causing) properties that are the most impairing and life-threatening.
The most prevalent health effects from exposure to chemicals are skin diseases (dermatitis), respiratory impairment (irritation, sensitization), neurotoxic effects (adverse effects on the central nervous system), and cancers from long-term exposure, along with a number of diseases affecting specific organs such as the liver and kidney. The degree of health impairment is very much dependent on the level of exposure, its duration, and the individual exposed.”

The appealing laundry “fresh smell" might be comforting, but it comes with a hidden cost. Fabric softener and dryer sheets are the leading cause of indoor air pollution. When you smell that "laundry smell," you are inhaling toxic VOCs.

Air fresheners
Air cleaners that produce ozone
Cleaning and disinfecting products
Cosmetics
Cigarette smoke
Pesticides

https://www.vdh.virginia.gov/environmental-epidemiology/fact-sheets-for-public-health/volatile-organic-compounds-vocs-in-your-home/

Exposure to VOC vapors can cause a variety of health effects, including eye, nose, and throat irritation; headaches and loss of coordination; nausea; and damage to the liver, kidneys, or central nervous system. Some VOCs are suspected or proven carcinogens.

https://www.pca.state.mn.us/pollutants-and-contaminants/volatile-organic-compounds-vocs

https://www.whatsinproducts.com/

https://www.health.state.mn.us/communities/environment/air/toxins/voc.htm

09/15/2024

Our baby girl is 17 today! 🎉 She is definitely a “senior” this year. She got a big little brother this year and she is tolerating him very well. She’s still my main sidekick and rides in the truck with me every day. Thank you Gina M Williams for letting me adopt our Bobo! She been my best girl for 17 years! 💜🐶

08/26/2024

❤️...!

08/26/2024

I love Dogs;.,,,

08/26/2024

08/26/2024

New York City around 1960

08/14/2024

I love Dogs...

08/14/2024

Have you all forgotten about what happened 4 years ago?!

I haven't.

Check this graph out. It's a heat map of sorts, ranking the results of all the available studies for all the treatments used to treat that virus, ranked.

What this tells us is that if you were a betting man you'd place your money on the top ones because according to the studies - and while we all know the rotten companies that produce patentable drugs manipulate their results (95% effective) - the ones with the most positive evidence are most likely to work and the ones at the bottom, with the least convincing evidence, are not.

So, at the top there are monoclonal antibodies.

Just to remind you, with a few solid studies in place supporting their use and safety, in 2022 the US FDA revoked the emergency use authorisation for this effective treatment.

[Bear in mind, if another drug existed that worked then the new, unapproved jibby jabbies made by the FDA's chief benefactors would not get their emergency use authorisation and thus would not be permitted to market.]

The FDA’s press release supporting said move stated the treatment is “highly unlikely to be active against the Omicron variants” and expressed concerns about its adverse effects.

They cited zero studies to support this stance and now everyone agrees that was a major mistake, that they would have helped a LOT of people, saved a LOT of lives, and so far without the safety concerns that the world is now experiencing with other treatments.

But I just want to draw your attention to the drug on the second line (you know, the drug that had won the noble prize for treating a variety of parasites, from Malaria to the Nile virus, in humans and after 4bil doses proved itself to be incredibly safe in the process...that's right, the one the FDA called a "horse dewormer... come on y'all" and forbid American GP's from recommending...and virtually all of them went along with it).

Turns out that very, very, very safe, very proven anti-parasitic, anti-viral was of course at least worth a shot.

In fact, two systematic reviews, where they gather all the available evidence on something, compile them and decide if it was effective or not, the very highest value studies we can produce, support the use of Ivermectin.

The Cochrane Institute was less sure on Ivermectin at the time, sadly, but then the research on Ivermectin was not of great quality at the time. The solution would have been a few, simple, relatively cheap and quick, well-conducted (used early as a preventative, as India did, not when people had the disease like US researchers were strangely keen to focus on...) randomised controlled trials conducted by the CDC. They would have sorted out the matter for us in a few months (they gave lots of money to Oxford University, you know, the guys that produced the models that told us 4% of us were going to die, but sadly they never got a single study done...)

Regardless, in a move that is equal parts sinister and unscientific, with all we now know today, I'm just after reading in the Washington Post that the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) has revoked the certifications of two doctors for supporting the use of Ivermectin.

That is sending a message - tow the line or be expelled to the wilderness. These (very correct) doctors have families and mortgages, so the idea of losing your license is suitably terrifying, and thus effective.

This approach is used in the veterinary sector too - recommend herbs BEFORE pharma meds, you will lose your license. Recommend homeopathy BEFORE pharma meds, you will lose your license. Now, if you recommend off label humans drugs, such as incredibly effective paraceatamol for pain relief, you will lose your license.

How long before - recommend fresh food over kibble, you will lose your license?! Not long, if the RCVS, the vet governing body in the UK, has anything to do with it.

Look at all the other things on that list - diet, quercetin (a form of natural antihistamine that reduces inflammation), curcumin, exercise, sunlight, VITAMIN D, zinc, hydroxychloroquine, Vitamin C - ALL OF THEM explicitly NOT recommended by the FDA - all sit above the FDA very-recommended (and patented by their financial backers) Paxlovid (an antiviral), which sits in 18th place, a drug that has plenty of evidence of side effects (remember when we were allowed to talk about side-effects?! Not anymore. Bloody antivaxxers. Or the far right or Elon Musk or whoever we're supposed to be blaming now).

You guys think it's over but it's not. It's still going on. All the shenanigans that went on are still happening. In fact, if anything our lack of response (and the trillions of dollars we gave them) will only encourage them.

Our studies are still produced by Big Pharma. Our regulators and media are still cash-owned by Big Pharma and silent as a result. Like our vets, our GPs have proven themselves completely unable to decipher fact from fiction, they are but leaves on a stream of crap information.

Facebook will kill the reach of this post and my page for sharing this sort of content, but screw them too, you have to hear it.

08/11/2024

This is Ruby and she will capture your heart. She has a sophisticated attitude.

08/11/2024

This is the 3rd mare in all my years of horses that I am truly fond of, she is a sweetheart. Her name is Bella.

08/11/2024

Met this handsome fella last week. His name is Simon and he is an amazing cat.

07/06/2024

We do try to evenly distribute the lovin’, but sometimes siblings ain’t havin’ it. 😂

06/24/2024

1973 Pontiac Firebird Formula 455

06/24/2024

The 1969 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28 is a legendary muscle car known for its aggressive styling and high-performance capabilities. With its iconic racing stripes and distinctive Z/28 badging, the Camaro Z/28 stands out on the road and track. Powered by a 302 cubic inch V8 engine, it delivered 290 horsepower, designed for high-revving performance and superb handling. The '69 model year introduced a refined design, with features such as a cowl-induction hood and front and rear spoilers. The Camaro Z/28's blend of style, agility, and power makes it a favorite among muscle car enthusiasts. Driving a '69 Z/28 is an exhilarating experience, celebrating Chevrolet's legacy of performance engineering.jgfg

06/24/2024

1969 Chevy Camaro