08/11/2024
"I don't want to be mean."
This phrase, spoken from well-meaning dog owners, is incredibly detrimental to not only the dog, but others who end up a victim of that dog's behavior.
So what constitutes mean?
Well if we go into the dictionary, we see multiple definitions.
1: The average of the given numbers.
So you don't want to be the average of the given numbers? Numbers of what? The times you've allowed your dog to do a behavior? What if that behavior is dangerous to others, like biting or jumping? What if the behavior is dangerous to itself, like bolting out a door or eating dropped pills? Do you allow a high number "mean" of times this behavior has happened and therefore cost your dog far more than the sum of a punishment? If we're feeling especially "mathy," we can multiply the cost of vet bills or lawsuits, add one needle with a certain percentage of pink juice, and subtract one animal.
No. I suppose in this case, you would not want to be mean.
Okay, next definition:
2: To have in the mind as a purpose; to serve or intend to convey, show, or signify. To have importance to the degree of.
What do you have in mind when you allow a behavior to carry on? What is your intention when you try and fail to create a proper inhibition in which to prevent future occurrences of a behavior? What importance do you place on the safety of your dog or others, and what degree of loss are you prepared to accumulate if you are not able to stop that behavior? When you allow a behavior to continue, it can become worse, more practiced. In the case of anxiety, poor impulse control, or aggression, it can also affect the health of your dog. Aggression should not have to happen if we are able to tell a dog that it is absolutely not allowed.
If your intention is not to prevent a behavior, then yes, I suppose you don't want to "mean" enough to your dog to save him from himself.
Next!
3: To direct to a particular individual.
This is an interesting one. What are we directing? Is it the knowledge that the dog is not allowed to do this behavior, or is it the knowledge that the dog CAN do this behavior? Are we directing proper clarity by giving definitive yes and no, or are we directing confusion by ignoring behavior (and therefore allowing it?) And who are we directing this at? If not our dog, then is it at the mailman who gets attacked? The child who is bitten? The cat who is killed? A guest who is knocked down?
Well in this case, we wouldn't want to be mean, but we're being VERY mean to others who suffer because of our dog's actions.
Rolling right along.
4: Lacking distinction or mental discrimination; of poor quality or inferior; worthy of little regard; lacking dignity or honor.
If we do not give our dog clarity in a non negotible way, we will be all these things to him. Dignity and honor doesn't matter to a dog. They eat p**p and sniff crotches. But in our own belief we feel if we do not punish, though we may end up causing our dog to not see us in a respectful light, at least we get to feel like we've achieved some form of honor. I'll tell you right now, that feeling is very short-lived when your disobedient dog hurts itself or others. Honor and dignity doesn't matter then.
5: Occupying a middle position; to serve as an intermediary; intervening.
There is no middle position in dog ownership. You are solely responsible if something your dog did comes to pass. You and your dog. You may of course serve as an intermediary in the handoff of your dog to Animal Control if he has to go to quarantine, and you may occupy the middle chair at a dog bite hearing, but that's about it. Unless you do a proper intervention before your dog's behavior gets to this point, this could happen, and it happens all the time, to well meaning people who never expected to end up here. If you are not a means to your dog's change of behavior, you are instead a means to his end.
6: Characterized by petty selfishness or malice. Causing trouble or bother.
Are you seeking to punish your dog out of selfishness or malice? Or are you punishing out of a compassionate desire to see him live a safe and full life without anxiety? Punishment-- done right, fairly, and with clarity--does not create confusion, anxiety, or fear. It creates an understanding, reduces stress, and even can strengthen the bond you have with your dog. But if you are not able to give a punishment to set your dog up for success faster, and this is because of your own morals, fears, or insecurities, then THAT is being selfish. And if you knowingly don't fix your situation, then you are putting your own feelings above your dog's wellbeing. And that is troublesome and creates much bother.
So no, don't be mean. Avoid this by being effective.
7: Excellent, effective. Useful. Helpful to a desired end.
Oh hey, look. If you don't want to be "mean," this one's for you. By not gaining excellent and effective control over your dog and his behavior, you are hurting more than helping.
So the next time you throw out that thought of not wanting to be mean, remember all the definitions for this word. Remember all the consequences for not giving proper and fair consequences. Remember that your role is not to let selfish emotion stop you from doing what will be beneficial to your dog long term.
Is a doctor "mean" for lancing your infected wound?
Is a teacher "mean" for giving you a failing grade and requesting you work harder?
Is a parent "mean" for taking away the car after you risked your safety and others by driving drunk?
Rethink your views. Do the inner work. Do whatever you can to keep your dog and others safe, up to and including actions that you currently consider "mean."
To do anything less is far worse.