06/09/2024
HALTER BREAKING
It is widely accepted in the training industry that all horses will have a reactionary response, or brace, in them of some sort when a pressure is applied. A brace starts in the mind and is demonstrated by the body, as a result of a response to stimulus. The common horsemanship quest is the matter of how small we can get that reaction (brace) to become.
Given that horses are prey animals, they rely heavily on their fight or flight instincts for survival. Training philosophies are typically formed around these instincts using methods of pressure and release. IE in the case of halter breaking a young horse, a pressure is applied, a fight or flight reaction happens, and the pressure goes away when the reaction stops and the correct answer is “rewarded”. The common belief seems to be that all horses will react that way in some sort, that is how they are wired. And there will inevitably be a fight of some kind during the process.
But what if we looked at the whole situation differently? What if they are reacting in such a way because that’s the only viable option we are giving them? What if we changed the way we ask the questions?
When I observe horses interacting in a natural herd setting, their instinctual method of communication with each other is not pressure and release, or fight or flight reactions, but the language of intention. Survival skills and reactions start from a threat of safety, whereas communication of intentions start from a net of safety. They need the herd dynamic to survive, and without a communication tactic the herd would be useless.
So, when we approach our horses with a method that is going to create a survival reaction first, and a thought second, there is ALWAYS going to be an aversion to that, because it stems from a threat of safety. it’s just a matter of how small that aversion can become.
Or, we can teach them to understand our intentions first, and THEN react accordingly, like they do naturally in a herd. This allows them to actually engage in the process because it stems from their natural need of safety for survival, which is desirable. Not only does this teach them how to think first, and react second, but there is no aversion to our intentions, they get to be a part of the conversation.
Here are a few clips of the steps I took in halter breaking my foal, Beau. To quickly sum it up, I started by creating connection through a change in his focus. When he understands how aware I am of him, it’s easy to get his attention. Once I can draw his attention easily and keep it at pretty much at any moment in time, then I attach the lead rope. By this point, he pretty much knows how to lead, just without the rope. Whenever he feels the slack come out of that rope, I show him the answer with the flag, drawing his thoughts to the right spot. Basically, from the VERY beginning I start with being able to get their attention easily, and every training principle builds off of that. The lead rope is just the physical connection point between our thoughts.