![](https://img3.voofla.com/396/648/590470673966488.jpg)
02/05/2025
Why French Classical Training?
And within that - why the Ecole de Legerete?
In my last post I wrote about my personal preferences and how they don't imply I dislike other people's choices.
This is obviously with the continued caveat that there are some things humans to do horses in the name of training which I can't tolerate. You know - side reins; sticking their legs in bungees and then whipping them to create passage ; hyperflexion; normalizing riding behind the vertical; draw reins and any other crazy contraptions. You get the gist. That stuff.
However, mostly, with regard to those of us interested in ethical, horse respectful, mindful training - it is a matter or preference and taste. And for a variety of reasons this approach appeals to me.
Here are some aspects of the French school as translated though the Ecole de Legerete which have, and continue to, win me over. You may find some of these are familiar to you, even if you find yourself training in a different tradition. And to be clear, these are my translations of what I have learned. In no particular order...
- A belief in the horses incredible capacity to learn. That if we use our brains it enables them to use theirs. We are both thinking creatures; we can just forget that we are. This approach enables us to think through solutions, negating the need for force.
- A recognition that balance is a huge deal for horses and that understanding how to help a horse with that may be the solution to many of your problems.
- Using the bit and the hands as a precise, precious and incredible means to communicate and become a source of relaxation and comfort.
- Balancing out the need for slow with the need for go. A horse will benefit from changing their balance through slow, precise work. They will also benefit from using their body in positive tension through the power of neck extension and go.
- The exquisite ongoing conversation between balance - relaxation - impulsion provides many routes to solutions for very different horses.
- One aid for one response is something I learned from a horsemanship perspective and which is also a tenant of Legerete. How horses understand anything other than this is a little beyond me.
- No opposing aids. This is a big one as so many of us were taught to use our hands and our legs at the same time in a way that means the horse has to say no to one or both. When we live with horses and see what utter geniuses they are, it really makes sense to make sense to them.
- Developing a gymnastic program which is individual to the horse. What exercises does your horse need, how and when? This means schooling your horse is never a drill, it is always an interesting, ever developing two way dialogue . I have to set my timer so I don't spend too long in the school these days as it is infinitely fascinating.
- It is not the circle which schools the horse, it is the aids. When I first heard Philippe Karl say this I had to go away and have a big think. Endless circles are a pointless endeavor if your horse does not have the cognitive understanding of what that entails, And this understanding in turn helps us to provide him with the physical capability.
- The aim is that our aids get lighter and more intuitive and the horse offers more and more in response. This for me is a joy and I suspect is infinitely preferable for the horse than, 'More legs, more legs'.
- I just do like the way the horses look. I enjoy seeing horses who can move freely, who are more like ballet dancers than body builders and who are interested in what's going on with their rider.
And teaching as many people as I do - who often come to me initially because things have gone awry with their horse - I have so many answers for which I am infinitely grateful. And I believe the horses are too...