14/06/2023
ALERT: Austin, Texas
UPDATE 6/12: The Austin Animal Advisory Commission voted to table this for further discussion after hearing problems with the draft from USARK and another speaker (only two speakers opposed). Some Commissioners also voiced concerns after hearing testimony. The draft should be amended and brought back at a future meeting.
Read below or at https://usark.org/23austin/
The Austin Animal Advisory Commission has introduced an animal program ban that is on the agenda for the June 12 meeting. This proposal bans programs with thousands of species including all animals that are “not ordinarily domesticated.” Most species are not domesticated so this would include reptiles, amphibians, parrots, sugar gliders, most mammals, and many others. This proposal is slightly different than others because it only affects businesses (even if only doing one or a few shows but still charging a fee) and would not apply to free programs or programs by IRS-registered non-profits.
The proposal bans any public exhibition but uses the misleading term “public interaction.” There does not actually need to be any interaction between an animal and a show attendee. Simply removing an animal from an enclosure or allowing pictures with no
permanent barrier qualifies as a “public interaction.” The minimum fine is $200.
Supposedly, the impetus of the bill was repeated injuries from animals at the Austin Aquarium (we do not know if this is accurate). Regardless, if there is a problem with one business or person, that party should be punished, not everyone. It is possible that individuals may not qualify as “for-profit zoo or aquarium” but the definition is not clear if this applies only to brick-and-mortar/permanent businesses.
Public comment will be allowed in person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to 512-978-0565 or [email protected].
Meeting details:
June 12, 2023, at 6:00 P.M. Austin City Hall, Room 1101 301 W. Second St., Austin, Texas 78701
Read the proposal at https://services.austintexas.gov/edims/document.cfm?id=410048.
Sample Messaging
Remember to be civil and professional at all times!
Austin Animal Advisory Commission email list:
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Sample Messaging
Subject line:
NO to Animal Public Interaction Ban
Sample letter
Austin Animal Advisory Commission Members,
As a dedicated advocate for animal welfare, I ask that this energy to ban all “public interactions” with animals be focused on actual problem businesses. Rather than focusing on those who are problems, this is collective punishment that punishes everyone doing these types of programs, even if they are reputable, legitimate, responsible, and causing no issues.
This proposal bans important animal programs including those provided to school classrooms, at public libraries, and before Scout troops. Kids cannot see first-hand how a chameleon eats or how its eyesight works. Scouts cannot interact with snakes and see how a nonvenomous snake, which could be held by a handler, is different from a venomous snake, that could be kept in a safe enclosure. A biology class cannot be given a presentation with a ferret, tortoise, parrot, and gecko to see firsthand how different these animals are. If anyone who is not a registered non-profit did one of these programs and charged any fee, even just enough to cover gas, that would be illegal.
Note that the definition of “public interaction” does not even need to include actual hands-on interaction. Simply being able to take photos or see an animal outside of an enclosure qualifies as “public interaction.” This proposal covers tens of thousands of species as every species that is non-domesticated, which is almost all animal species, is covered by the definition of “wild animal.”
Superfluous and redundant laws are becoming commonplace. Tax dollars and legislative resources are continually being wasted to propose overreaching and unjust laws. Even worse, collective punishment is becoming an accepted practice in our government. Instead of focusing on criminals, many new laws choose to punish good citizens.
This bill is far-reaching and rife with unintended consequences, including making criminals out of those dedicated individuals who responsibly conduct outreach programs with animals. Overreach and collective punishment should not be so common in American government policy. It is such a shame to see this in my home state of Texas. I expected better.
Thank you for your time and consideration on this matter. Please realize that this legislation is illogical and unjust. Have a good day.
Sincerely,
[YOUR NAME]