06/06/2025
If you're an animal trainer, you may have heard that the way to "transfer cues" – or to get the animal to perform a behavior when you present a new cue – is by giving the new cue for the behavior, followed immediately by the old cue. The idea is that the animal will learn to anticipate, or predict, the old cue and will, therefore, start to perform the behavior when you present the new cue.
But is this what actually happens? In my own experience, I've found that sometimes this procedure works and sometimes ... it doesn't.
Sometimes, it just teaches the animal to wait ... and wait ... and wait ... for the old cue. They never anticipate the old cue, and so they never start to perform the behavior when I give the new cue.
This is exactly what happened when I tried to use this new cue/old cue transfer procedure with my pup, Deelie. Not only did she learn to sit and stare at me while she waited for the old cue, I also seem to have confused and frustrated her – you'll hear her whining a bit in this video. I think this might be a good way to "bake in" some barking and whining to our training sessions!
I believe, surely, there must be a more reliable, less confusing way to help our animals learn to transfer cues.
My graduate research has focused on this problem. And, I am seeing some really promising results! I hope you'll stay tuned, and follow along here, as I continue to try to develop a more reliable way to transfer cues :)
*Note: No Deelies were harmed in the filming of this video. She seems to have suffered no permanent ill effects from this mildly frustrating training session ;-)