04/01/2025
Handlers discipline dogs in their own ways.
- These dogs are government property and paid for by citizens’ tax dollars. Handlers must adhere to agency protocols when handling, training, or correcting their dogs.
If this is only one side of the story, please show us the rest.
-What happened prior to the video?
-What are the statements of other witnesses?
-What does their training material say about physical strikes as a training or corrective technique?
If these are “proper corrective techniques”, where else is this happening? Where are these described? How are handlers trained to use them?
The “alpha” mentality is based on debunked wolf pack theories. Dogs are not wolves, and our interactions with them should not be based on asserting dominance. Working dogs are teammates, with each partner performing a role that the other cannot. Asserting dominance and using physical strikes as correction creates fear, anxiety, avoidance, and aggression.
Any training technique that must be hidden should be investigated.
-First, there's very little that can be hidden now.
-Second, smart working dogs learn context, and restricting correction to a specific context will likely make the undesired behavior more frequent.
-Third, any interaction with a taxpayer funded sentient creature should be available for public scrutiny.
Working dogs are just dogs...highly motivated and energetic dogs, but still just dogs. Animal behavior theory and techniques are universal and apply to companion dogs, working dogs, elephants, mice, and humans. Working dogs can and should be trained (including “punishing” or decreasing the likelihood of undesired behaviors) without force or pain.
If the agent used her training appropriately and no violations of policy occurred, this is an agency problem, not just one rogue agent. Each agent has individual responsibility, but the agency is responsible for the effects of their policies on the animals they are entrusted with.
Fully agree with the PETA Vice President. This is what was caught on camera. What is happening out of sight?
Fully agree on the need for a third party investigation. One aspect is if the agent complied with agency policies. The other is if those policies support the health, welfare, and performance of working animals.
Think about the potential health effects. Blunt trauma to the chest could fracture a rib or cause a pneumothorax, muscle contusion, or joint trauma… any of which would complicate this dog’s ability to do its detection job. To make the medicine simple, the dog can’t smell things if it can’t breathe.
Think about the potential dog handler team effects. How likely is this dog to engage with their handler and follow their cues during the vehicle search that starts 15-30 seconds after this video? To make the training ethics simple, the dog won’t want to work with its abuser.
—-Brian Farr DVM, MSTR, Diplomate ACVPM & ACVSMR
https://www.expressnews.com/news/border-mexico/article/border-patrol-union-20013060.php
San Antonio Express-News
PETA demanded in a letter to Border Patrol officials that a handler accused of kicking her K-9 partner be reassigned and the dog be removed from her custody.