14/08/2024
Have you all forgotten about what happened 4 years ago?!
I haven't.
Check this graph out. It's a heat map of sorts, ranking the results of all the available studies for all the treatments used to treat that virus, ranked.
What this tells us is that if you were a betting man you'd place your money on the top ones because according to the studies - and while we all know the rotten companies that produce patentable drugs manipulate their results (95% effective) - the ones with the most positive evidence are most likely to work and the ones at the bottom, with the least convincing evidence, are not.
So, at the top there are monoclonal antibodies.
Just to remind you, with a few solid studies in place supporting their use and safety, in 2022 the US FDA revoked the emergency use authorisation for this effective treatment.
[Bear in mind, if another drug existed that worked then the new, unapproved jibby jabbies made by the FDA's chief benefactors would not get their emergency use authorisation and thus would not be permitted to market.]
The FDA’s press release supporting said move stated the treatment is “highly unlikely to be active against the Omicron variants” and expressed concerns about its adverse effects.
They cited zero studies to support this stance and now everyone agrees that was a major mistake, that they would have helped a LOT of people, saved a LOT of lives, and so far without the safety concerns that the world is now experiencing with other treatments.
But I just want to draw your attention to the drug on the second line (you know, the drug that had won the noble prize for treating a variety of parasites, from Malaria to the Nile virus, in humans and after 4bil doses proved itself to be incredibly safe in the process...that's right, the one the FDA called a "horse dewormer... come on y'all" and forbid American GP's from recommending...and virtually all of them went along with it).
Turns out that very, very, very safe, very proven anti-parasitic, anti-viral was of course at least worth a shot.
In fact, two systematic reviews, where they gather all the available evidence on something, compile them and decide if it was effective or not, the very highest value studies we can produce, support the use of Ivermectin.
The Cochrane Institute was less sure on Ivermectin at the time, sadly, but then the research on Ivermectin was not of great quality at the time. The solution would have been a few, simple, relatively cheap and quick, well-conducted (used early as a preventative, as India did, not when people had the disease like US researchers were strangely keen to focus on...) randomised controlled trials conducted by the CDC. They would have sorted out the matter for us in a few months (they gave lots of money to Oxford University, you know, the guys that produced the models that told us 4% of us were going to die, but sadly they never got a single study done...)
Regardless, in a move that is equal parts sinister and unscientific, with all we now know today, I'm just after reading in the Washington Post that the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) has revoked the certifications of two doctors for supporting the use of Ivermectin.
That is sending a message - tow the line or be expelled to the wilderness. These (very correct) doctors have families and mortgages, so the idea of losing your license is suitably terrifying, and thus effective.
This approach is used in the veterinary sector too - recommend herbs BEFORE pharma meds, you will lose your license. Recommend homeopathy BEFORE pharma meds, you will lose your license. Now, if you recommend off label humans drugs, such as incredibly effective paraceatamol for pain relief, you will lose your license.
How long before - recommend fresh food over kibble, you will lose your license?! Not long, if the RCVS, the vet governing body in the UK, has anything to do with it.
Look at all the other things on that list - diet, quercetin (a form of natural antihistamine that reduces inflammation), curcumin, exercise, sunlight, VITAMIN D, zinc, hydroxychloroquine, Vitamin C - ALL OF THEM explicitly NOT recommended by the FDA - all sit above the FDA very-recommended (and patented by their financial backers) Paxlovid (an antiviral), which sits in 18th place, a drug that has plenty of evidence of side effects (remember when we were allowed to talk about side-effects?! Not anymore. Bloody antivaxxers. Or the far right or Elon Musk or whoever we're supposed to be blaming now).
You guys think it's over but it's not. It's still going on. All the shenanigans that went on are still happening. In fact, if anything our lack of response (and the trillions of dollars we gave them) will only encourage them.
Our studies are still produced by Big Pharma. Our regulators and media are still cash-owned by Big Pharma and silent as a result. Like our vets, our GPs have proven themselves completely unable to decipher fact from fiction, they are but leaves on a stream of crap information.
Facebook will kill the reach of this post and my page for sharing this sort of content, but screw them too, you have to hear it.