31/12/2020
🦠WARNING: CEREAL-BASED DRY FOOD CONTAINS MUTLI-DRUG RESISTANT BACTERIA AND, UNLIKE RAW DOG FOOD, THESE HAVE BEEN LINKED TO INFECTIONS IN HUMANS...🦠
In case you or your vet sees the latest safety concerns regarding raw dog food, it MAY be a vector for multi-drug resistant bacteria (MDRB).
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/raw-dog-food-meat-safe-bacteria-risk-public-health-antibiotic-resistance-a9474451.html?fbclid=IwAR1-rGcyAw3tzDcRQg6VQHTLa1oBfaNEHFWSyOF2QKHp1o1jfSqAFUKQsJI
This is true, it might be. As ever, you want to make sure you're using a reputable supplier (actually, on that note, I must tell you about Raw Safe which is coming in down the line. Just another level of protection for your the consumer).
It should hearten you a little that good raw dog food manufacturers use the best suppliers, they can't afford to use anyone else, so they are expected to have significantly less of this issue.
But more importantly, raw dog food here is nothing but the canary in the gold mine. The meat industry is the SOURCE of these bugs. The UK has more than 1000 mega-farms / CAFO's, known for desperately cramped and cruel conditions, filth and MRDB (the US is another level again as more than 90% of their meat comes from these hell holes, and they use a lot more chemicals). So if and when raw dog food processes the passed-fit-for-human-consumption pieces from these cesspits and ends up having issues that means WE are exposed to the same issues off the shelf of the supermarket.
Good reporting would be properly investigating and exposing the FILTHY MEAT INDUSTRY, identifying the worst suppliers by simple shelf tests, helping to force them to sort out the problems at the top.
But no. AS USUAL these biased regurgitations (was going to say 'reporting' their for a moment, just caught myself) of factoids is never, ever, ever balanced with a look at the alternatives - dry food!
So to add a little balance, here are two paragraphs from my forthcoming book Raw Science that might add a little badly-needed balance to this particular debate:
"Chaban et al. (2010) investigated the shedding of Campylobacter by apparently healthy (n=70) and diarrheic (n=65) dogs. Only the diets of the healthy dogs were recorded. 15 of them ate some or all raw meat and bone. They found that 58% (41 of 70) of the healthy dogs were shedding Campylobacter. This means, even if all the raw-fed dogs were shedding Campylobacter, at least half of the dry-fed dogs were too. And, UNLIKE RAW DOG FOOD, authors have isolated the same species of drug-resistant Campylobacter jejunifrom a dog fed a commercial dry diet as detected in a girl infected with the same strain, though it’s conceivable the dog may have eaten the same food the girl did."
https://bmcmicrobiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2180-10-73
"Leonard et al. assessed the antimicrobial resistance patterns of Salmonella and E.coli recovered from pet dogs (n=132) in Ontario between 2005-2006 revealed that 96% were shedding anti-microbial resistant E.coli in their faeces. Unless every owner in Ontario was raw feeding back in 2005, then it’s more than clear that commercial diets are not sorting that problem out either. Fifty-eight of the isolates were resistant to two or more drug classes, with 70.7% and 29.3% being E. coli and Salmonella, respectively."
https://academic.oup.com/jac/article/67/1/174/727070
And let's not forget the pet for test results by Thixton (attached, https://truthaboutpetfood.com/the-pet-food-test-results/).
So, suck 💩 The Independent and anyone else who propagates this industry-loaded BS to the detriment of pets worldwide.