Maxwell Pet

Maxwell Pet Our formulas support pet health naturally & effectively with zero side effects. Tested on humans, lo How crazy is that?
(1)

I'm Dr. Stuart Garber, and I've been practicing natural medicine for 35 years. My mission, my passion, has been to help people live a healthy and happy life without the harmful side effects of drugs. This led me to develop my unique Biotherapy Formulas which produced truly unprecedented results for many of my patients' most pressing health concerns. We have already sold well over 100,000 bottles a

nd they are used by doctors nationwide. I have owned many pets during those years and I have treated them with my formulas with amazing results. Because of continual requests from other dog owners for more formulas to help their dogs, I decided to create MaxWell Pet. Prescriptions from veterinarians can have the same side effects as those for humans. For instance, you might bring your dog in because he's in pain, so the vet prescribes painkillers...that make your dog incontinent. Getting these natural formulas into every dog owner's hands will help our best friends live a healthy and happy life.

help humans and their animals who are victims of wildfire smoke inhalation....read Dr. G's latest blast to see how you c...
12/07/2024

help humans and their animals who are victims of wildfire smoke inhalation....read Dr. G's latest blast to see how you can hel[

Horses love the taste of Dr Garber's equine bioformulas and think they are a treat.

šŸ¾ š–š¢š„ššŸš¢š«šžš¬ ššš§š ššžš­ š’šššŸšžš­š² šŸ¾  Wildfire smoke affects our pets just as much as us, if not more. Here are four ways to pro...
01/07/2024

šŸ¾ š–š¢š„ššŸš¢š«šžš¬ ššš§š ššžš­ š’šššŸšžš­š² šŸ¾

Wildfire smoke affects our pets just as much as us, if not more. Here are four ways to protect your furry friends:

1ļøāƒ£ šŒšØš§š¢š­šØš« š€š¢š« šš®ššš„š¢š­š²: Keep pets indoors when air quality is poor. Check the AQI regularly and limit exercise if the AQI is over 150. Keep everyone inside if it's above 200.

2ļøāƒ£ š‡š²šš«ššš­šž: Ensure your pets have access to plenty of clean water. Horses especially drink most of their water after eating hay.

3ļøāƒ£ š†š«šØšØš¦š¢š§š : Wipe your petā€™s muzzle, coat, and feet with a damp cloth to remove particulate matter they may have picked up outside.

4ļøāƒ£ š‡šØš„š¢š¬š­š¢šœ š’š®š©š©šØš«š­: Dr. Garberā€™s bioformulas for animals, with ingredients like Juniper and Black Currant, support respiratory health and overall well-being during wildfire season.

As Dr. Barbara Hodges from the Humane Society Veterinary Medical Association says, "Animals are just as likely to be impacted by dense smoke and air quality issues as we are."

For more tips on protecting your pets during wildfire season, read our blog: https://drgarbers.com/blogs/pets/wildfires-and-animals-what-to-do šŸŒæ

Please visit our website to learn more about our animal formulas.
26/06/2024

Please visit our website to learn more about our animal formulas.

Dr. Garberā€™s

17/05/2024

Dear Friends and Colleagues, I want to thank all of you. Your support and the trust youā€™ve placed in me and my formulas over the past 20 years has been invaluableā€”not only professionally but spiritually. Itā€™s no small thing to put your well-being in someone elseā€™s hands. Itā€™s humbling, ess...

Really good advice on what to check when your otherwise healthy dog isn't eating. Knowing this information along with kn...
22/12/2023

Really good advice on what to check when your otherwise healthy dog isn't eating. Knowing this information along with knowing your dog well can save your best friend's life or save you an unnecessary trip to the vet.

If your dog is acting normally but not eating it they may be eating in secret or they may just be going through a phase.

29/10/2023
Stuart Garber and his enterouge
28/10/2023

Stuart Garber and his enterouge

06/10/2023

Todayā€™s nY Times full opinion piece

OPINION
We Should Have Known So Much About Covid from the Start
Oct. 5, 2023

By David Wallace-Wells
Opinion writer
America has begun to treat Covid-19 like just any other disease ā€” boosters are now arriving on an annual fall cycle, on the flu model, with large portions of the country not bothering with them, also on the flu model.

But, objectively, Covid is not just another disease ā€” not yet. Last year, it was the only infectious disease among the countryā€™s top 10 causes of death. We are obviously on an off-ramp from the pandemic emergency, since even though many more Americans have gotten Covid over the last year, many fewer are dying than did in the first two years of Covid-19. But while the worst is behind us, itā€™s also not quite right to see the disease as epidemiological wallpaper.

This is precisely the long transition from emergency to normality that the immunologist and epidemiologist Michael Mina has predicted since almost the beginning of the pandemic. Beginning in 2020, Mina took pains to describe Covid-19 as a ā€œtextbook virus,ā€ with features that may have startled lay people ā€” long Covid and post-acute sequelae, waning immunity and reinfection ā€” but were, in his view, simply what could be expected from a new pathogen spreading through a global population with no immunity.

I spoke to Mina about what seeing Covid as a textbook virus tells us about the nature of the pandemic off-ramp ā€” and about everything else we shouldā€™ve known about the disease from the outset. Iā€™ve edited and condensed our conversation for clarity, and added some material from a follow-up interview.

ADVERTISEMENT

Letā€™s start with the present. Where are we with this virus, heading toward year four?

I think weā€™re like toddlers. Maybe weā€™re four years old, maybe five. Iā€™ve always said weā€™re going to have to grow out of this virus, to grow out of the pandemic, by gradually building our immune system up.

The vaccines can accelerate that process. But those gains will be marginally less powerful over time, especially because the spike protein of the virus, which is the focus of most vaccines, keeps mutating.

Itā€™s so hard to talk about this in public because people think by talking about immunity, Iā€™m saying people need to get exposed. Well, you can get exposed or you can get vaccinated. But either way, we have to keep building our immune system up, as babies do. That takes years to do. And I think itā€™s going to be a few more years at least.

And in the meantime?

Weā€™ve seen a dramatic reduction in mortality. Weā€™ve even seen, Iā€™d say, a dramatic decline in rates of serious long Covid per infection.

ADVERTISEMENT

But I do think itā€™s going to be a while before this virus becomes completely normal. And Iā€™ve never been convinced that this current generation of elderly people will ever get to a place where it is completely normal. If youā€™re 65 or 75 or even older ā€” itā€™s really hard to teach an immune system new tricks if youā€™re that age. And so while we may see excess mortality in the elderly decline somewhat, I donā€™t think weā€™ll see it ever disappear for this generation who was already old when the pandemic hit. Many will never develop that robust, long-term immunological memory we would want to see ā€” and which happens naturally to someone whoā€™s been exposed hundreds of times since they were a little baby.

For babies born today, though, I really think theyā€™re not going to view Covid as any different than other viruses. By the time they are 20, it will be like any other virus to them. Because their immune systems will have grown up with it.

When you say ā€œhundreds of times,ā€ thatā€™s striking. The way most people think about a virus like, say, RSV, or chickenpox, is that a single exposure, while potentially worrisome, does deliver lifelong protection. Is it really the case that, as babies, we are fighting off those viruses hundreds of times?

The short answer is yeah. We start seeing viruses when weā€™re 2 months old, when weā€™re a month old. And a lot of these viruses weā€™ve seen literally tens, if not hundreds of times for some people by the time weā€™re adults. People tend to think that immunity is binary ā€” youā€™re either immune or youā€™re not. That couldnā€™t be farther from the truth. Itā€™s a gradient, and your protection gets stronger the more times you see a virus.

ADVERTISEMENT

Take chickenpox. As you say, people used to think that if you got chickenpox, you were good, youā€™d never get the virus again. But you can get shingles ā€”

Which is caused by the same virus, though in older people.

It used to only happen when your immune system fell below a certain level: as you age, you lose your immunological memory and you can get shingles. But in recent years weā€™ve seen a massive shift in the age of people getting shingles. It used to be mostly people in their 70s or older. Now itā€™s hitting people in their 30s. And people started to say, well, thatā€™s weird, whatā€™s going on?

Yeah ā€” what is going on?

We used to think we just had this spectacular immune response when we first encountered the virus at, say, age 6, and that the immune response lasted until we were 70. But actually what we were seeing was the effect of an immune system being retrained every time it came into contact with the virus after the initial infection ā€” at 6, and 7, and 8, and so on. Every time your friend got chickenpox, or your neighbor, you got a massive boost. You were re-upping your immune response and diversifying your immunological tools ā€” potentially multiple times a year, a kind of natural booster.

But now, in America, kids get chickenpox vaccines. So you donā€™t have kids in America getting chickenpox today, and never will. But that means that older Americans, who did get it as kids, are not being exposed again ā€” certainly not multiple times each year. And it turns out that, in the absence of routine re-exposures, that first exposure alone isnā€™t nearly as good at driving lifelong immunity and warding off shingles until you immune system begins to fall apart in old age ā€” it can last until youā€™re in your 30s, for example but not until your 70s.

Thereā€™s a similar story with measles. There is no routine later-life sequelae, like shingles, for measles. But what we do see is that, in measles outbreaks today, there are some people who were vaccinated who get it anyway. Maybe 5 to 15 percent of cases are not immunologically naĆÆve people, but vaccinated people. So ā€” whatā€™s up with that? We thought we had lifelong protection from childhood vaccination, but because thereā€™s no more natural boosting of measles anymore, that protection wanes to some degree over time.

But to think about that in the context of Covid, for a minute ā€” all of those subsequent exposures to chickenpox were basically invisible. You didnā€™t get sick the second or fifth or ninth time you encountered the virus. Covid is still making some people sick, on reinfection, if typically less sick.

And with Covid, weā€™re getting infected frequently. But there is also a very basic difference between a disease like Covid and a disease like measles or chickenpox. For measles or chickenpox to cause a symptomatic infection, it has to be brought into the body, through the upper respiratory tract and the lungs, into the bloodstream and the lymph. It doesnā€™t really even start replicating until it gets that deep into the body. And if it doesnā€™t get that deep, it doesnā€™t replicate. With a disease like that, our T-cells and B-cells, which were created during past exposure or by vaccination, typically stop the virus early enough that no replication happens and we donā€™t even notice it.

With Covid, when it infects you, it can land in your upper respiratory tract and it just start replicating right there. Immediately, itā€™s present and replicating in your lungs and in your nose. And that alone elicits enough of an immune response to cause us to feel really crappy and even cause us to feel disease. But itā€™s why we donā€™t see the severe disease as much, with a second exposure or an exposure after vaccination: For most people, itā€™s not getting into the heart and the liver and stuff nearly as easily. But it doesnā€™t have to. Itā€™s still causing symptomatic disease. And maybe mucosal vaccines could stop this, but without them weā€™re likely to continue seeing infections and even symptomatic infections.

This is a very different story about immunity than we were told through most of 2020 and into 2021, though. Back then, I think the conventional wisdom was that a single exposure ā€” through infection or vaccination ā€” would be the end of the pandemic for you. If this is basic virology and immunology, how did we get that so wrong?

The short answer is that epidemiologists are not immunologists and immunologists are not virologists and virologists are not epidemiologists. And, in general, physicians donā€™t know anything about the details. And the world has never before been forced to so directly grapple with these nuances.

But this failure had some pretty concrete impacts. When reinfections first began popping up, people were surprised, they were scared, and then, to some degree, they lost trust in vaccines. And the people they were turning to for guidance ā€” not only did they not warn us about that, they were slow to acknowledge it, as well.

It had dramatic impacts and ripple effects that will last for years to limit our ability to get populations properly vaccinated. I know from pretty firsthand experience that both White Houses at different points were not making their decisions purely by the book.

And as Iā€™ve argued elsewhere, if we know that the elderly are going to continue to be vulnerable, you really kind of need to tell them that theyā€™re still vulnerable.

That was just not politically palatable. And frankly, it was scientific group think.

We really did imagine that there was an end game around the corner, not, whatā€™s it going to be like living with this disease forever after?

Thatā€™s absolutely right. And the worst thing we can do during a pandemic is set inappropriately high expectations. These vaccines are incredible, theyā€™ve had an enormously positive impact on mortality, but they were never going to end the pandemic.

And now, thereā€™s a huge number of people questioning, do these vaccines even do anything? But we could have just set the narrative better at the beginning: look, you might get sick again, but your risk of landing in the hospital is going to be really low, and if you get a booster, you might still get sick again, but your risk of landing in the hospital is going to be even lower. Thatā€™s something I think humans can deal with, and I think the public could have understood it.

Instead, we set society up for failure, since people feel like the government failed everyone, that biology failed us, and that this was a crazy virus that has broken all the rules of our immune system, when itā€™s just doing what weā€™ve always known it would do.

How do you wish we had messaged things differently? What would it have meant to communicate early and clearly that Covid was a textbook virus, as you say?

I think the biggest thing would have been just to say, we understand the enemy.

To say that this is a textbook virus, it doesnā€™t mean that itā€™s not killing people. Objectively, itā€™s still killing more people than any other infectious disease. What it means is that we couldā€™ve taken action based on what we knew, rather than waiting around to prove everything and publish papers in Nature and Science talking about things we already knew.

What action do you mean?

The first thing that really pushed me to start talking about it was seasonality. We could have prepared for November and December of 2020 and then for November and December of 2021. But everyone kept saying, we donā€™t know if itā€™s going to come back. We knew it was going to come back and it makes me want to cry to think about it. We did nothing and hundreds of thousands of people died. We didnā€™t prepare nursing homes because we all got to the summer of 2020 and we said, cross our fingers.

And then when the cases dropped in January and February, we were told it was because of human behavior modification. No People didnā€™t change their behavior that much between January and March. We had a lot of epidemiologists saying that. But if you just sat back and said, what do we know about these kinds of viruses, one of the first things you would say would be, well, they peak in January in countries like ours, in climates like ours, and usually by the third week of January, theyā€™re really falling fast.

But itā€™s not just seasonality. Aerosol spread, age skew ā€¦

We knew how tests worked. We knew about serial testing and why it was important for a public health approach. We knew that vaccines could have really good impacts once they were around. And if you were looking through the correct lens, we even knew that they werenā€™t going to stop transmission.

We didnā€™t have to live in a world where we were flying blind. We could have lived in a world where weā€™re knowledgeable. But instead, we chose almost across the board to will ourselves into this state of fear and anxiety.

And that really started in the earliest days. Almost the first experience I had was a lot like that movie with Jennifer Lawrence ā€”

Donā€™t Look Up.

I was watching the virus transmit in China wearing my epidemiology hat, and I remember going to the Brigham Hospital at Harvard, where I was the associate director of molecular virology, and saying, I need some resources. Weā€™ve got to build a Covid test. This is going to be at our doorstep any day. And Iā€™m like, oh my God, how do you guys not see this? Itā€™s following every pattern we would expect for a virus that of course is going to circulate the globe. You should not be surprised in February, in March when itā€™s killing people in Boston.

I remember telling a friend in early March that a million Americans might die and having him freeze in disbelief.

But none of this was complicated. You just had to ask a simple question: what would happen if you took away all immunity from an adult? Well, once you control for no immunity, adults are going to get very, very sick.

Of course, by and large, babies didnā€™t get very sick from this disease.

Babies are immunologically naĆÆve, but they are also resilient. A virus can tear up a baby, but a baby can repair its tissue so fast. Adults donā€™t have that. Itā€™s just like a baby getting a cut. Theyā€™ll heal really quick. An adult getting a cut ā€” you go by age, and every decade of age that you are, itā€™s going to take exponentially longer for that wound to heal. Eventually get to 80 or 90 and the wound canā€™t even heal. In the immunology world, this is called ā€œtolerance.ā€ Adults donā€™t have it as much. What they have instead is a well-trained immune system. And so, taking that view, you have to say, what would happen to an adult who doesnā€™t have that tolerance but also lacks all immunity?

I wanted to ask about some of the rarer outcomes, which struck most Americans as quite disconcerting. Pretty early on we saw it affecting the heart, for instance, or the brain.

Right ā€” why are all these organ systems getting damaged when other viruses donā€™t seem to do that? Itā€™s natural to think, itā€™s Covid ā€” this is a weird disease. But itā€™s much more a story about immunity and how it develops than about the virus or the disease. None of our organ systems had any immune defenses around to help them out. And I think that the majority of post-acute sequelae and multi-organ complications and long Covid ā€” they are not the result of the virus being a crazy different virus, but are a result of this virus replicating in an environment where there were such absent or exceedingly low defenses.

Is it the same whenever we encounter a virus for the first time?

Think about travelers. Travelers get way more sick from a local disease than people who grew up with that virus. If you get malaria as a traveler, youā€™re much more likely to get really sick. You donā€™t see everyone in Nicaragua taking chloroquine every day. But you definitely see travelers taking it, because malaria can be deadly for adults.

What about, not severity, but post-acute complications ā€” do we have long malaria? Do we have liver complications from dengue?

The really hard part of answering that question is thereā€™s just not enough data on the frequency of long-term effects, because nothing like this has ever happened at such scale. Itā€™s like everyone in Europe and North America suddenly traveled to a country where malaria was endemic.

We see something similar with kids. I used to work with some pediatricians at Boston Childrenā€™s Hospital who would get all these weird cases ā€” kids with random new heart problems, for instance. Itā€™s called idiopathic, but idiopathic just means we donā€™t know what just happened. And my bet is that it is almost always a virus. It really is. Weā€™re just seeing it with Covid now on a much different scale.

There was a good example that happened recently, with an enterovirus thatā€™s infecting kids and causing acute flaccid myelitis ā€” polio-like symptoms. Thereā€™s a new version of hand, foot and mouth disease. It entered into the North American populace around 2011. Itā€™s causing much more atypical and severe disease in adults.

I think I had that.

Or measles. When you have a really bad measles case, it can get into your brain. We donā€™t normally think about it, but it can. And thereā€™s people who get long-term effects and die 10 years after they get measles. Itā€™s called subacute sclerosing panencephalitis.

Or think about H.I.V. It essentially kills your immune system, and once the immune barriers are down, other viruses that used to infect humans would get into tissues that we didnā€™t like them to get into. If there wasnā€™t such a clear signal of a loss of CD-4 T cells to explain it, people might still be scratching their heads and going, man, I wonder why all these patients are getting fungal infections. Well, thereā€™s a virus there thatā€™s depleting their immune system.

In general it feels like weā€™re learning a lot more about these interactions lately ā€” for instance, your research links between Epstein Barr and multiple sclerosis.

Covid is absolutely waking the world up to this ā€” to the fact that there are really weird long-term sequelae to viruses when they infect organ systems that would normally be protected. And I think weā€™re going to find that more and more cancers are being attributed to viral infections.

It wasnā€™t that long ago that we first learned that most cases of cervical cancer were caused by H.P.V. ā€” I think the 1980s. And now we have a vaccine for H.P.V. and rates of cervical cancer have fallen by two-thirds.

Weā€™ve always seen these problems associated with viruses or these problems that bring people into the hospital that are usually just not diagnosed. But I think Covid is raising massive awareness.

And what about incidence? Weā€™ve talked at a few points about how important itā€™s to think about all of these questions in terms of the scale. What is the right scale for thinking about future long Covid, for instance, or other post-acute sequelae?

I think the absolute risk, per infection, is going down and down and down. Thatā€™s just true.

My understanding is that the best data on long Covid prevalence comes from the U.K.ā€™s Office of National Statistics, which shows a much lower risk of developing long Covid now, from reinfection, than from an initial infection earlier in the pandemic.

I think the worst is behind us. By far. But I know multiple people, very close to me, who are dealing with really severe long Covid. Some of them have amorphous symptoms, but havenā€™t been able to work for a few years. Some have very significant heart disease. One person is in surgery right now today, from an infection a few years ago. But the worst is definitely behind us, which is a good thing, especially for people who worry that the problems will keep building and a lot of people ā€” or even everyone ā€” will get long Covid symptoms. I donā€™t think thereā€™s a world where weā€™re looking at the babies of today dealing with long Covid at any meaningful scale.

My understanding is that, for long Covid at least, the large majority are relatively well recovered within a year.

Yes, thatā€™s right. But a lot of the fear right now comes from the worst cases, and thereā€™s a lot of worst cases. Even one of the people that I know well, I know in their mind theyā€™re worried that theyā€™ll never recover, but I think objectively they are recovering slowly. It might not be an eight month course. It might be a year and a half. But they will get better. Most of us will.

13/09/2023

From The NY Times today.

Less than 20 percent of Americans got the previous booster ā€” a bivalent shot that arrived last fall and was designed to protect against the original virus as well as Omicron subvariants BA.4 and BA.5. And while some parts of our immune system have long memories, the antibodies that help prevent infections decrease significantly in a matter of months.

So what protection will the other 80% of Americans turn to?

Of course 60 million (the 20% still willing to trust Big Pharma) is a big enough market to go through all the trouble of developing and marketing a new vac.

Stuart Garber is going to share his immune boost protocol in the next day or so and guide you where to set up an account with a natural supplement distributer so you order what you need from them directly.

He is not set up to service you for all ingredients to his protocol. His remedies are just one part of what we take to stay healthy.

09/09/2023

Todayā€™s NY Timesā€¦there is hope for democracy yetā€¦.

The New York Times

Your comment has been approved!
Thank you for sharing your thoughts with The New York Times community.

Helen K Garber | Santa Fe, New Mexico
The unfortunate thing during the governmentā€™s suppression of alternate means of fighting the pandemic was that many good choices were suppressed too. Long Covid could have been prevented if the same pressure to take the vaccine was also used to teach people how to build their immune system. New spikes will continue to happen and if one is prepared with a better immune system, they too will have an easier case if exposed and easier recovery as I did and all my husbandā€™s patients. It was so sad to see that the government had such a lock hold on what was deemed misinformation that if I posted something positive about my husbandā€™s line of effective natural remedies , my words would be jumped on as trying to make money off a national disaster. The general public was not informed that those free vaccines were being purchased by tax dollars enriching big pharma by tens of billions of dollars. The viruses will continue to reimagine themselves and keeping your body healthy and strong naturally is the most promising form of prevention along with the future health of your body..

We have reached 500 followers! Thank you for your continued support. We could not have done it without each of you. šŸ™šŸ¤—
10/01/2023

We have reached 500 followers! Thank you for your continued support. We could not have done it without each of you. šŸ™šŸ¤—

Anyone want to see Belinda Carlisle at the Lensic?Tuesday night, Nov 8.  Aisle seats in orchestraSold at face value
04/11/2022

Anyone want to see Belinda Carlisle at the Lensic?
Tuesday night, Nov 8. Aisle seats in orchestra
Sold at face value

$140 ā€” 2 Orch/aisle Belinda Carlisle Tickets/ Lensic near the Sunlit Hills neighborhood in Santa Fe, NM. Find items in Finds on Nextdoor - all listings are local.

Rainy day, so bored.
08/10/2022

Rainy day, so bored.

If you've wondered how your dog might benefit from from seeing a chiropractor, this article lays it out nicely. I am acc...
30/05/2022

If you've wondered how your dog might benefit from from seeing a chiropractor, this article lays it out nicely. I am accepting new canine patients Santa Fe, New Mexico. You can reach me at 505.913.7493

Has your dog lost mobility or suffer from joint pain? Try a dog chiropractor -- an all-natural, holistic treatment approach to help your pup.

  occur for reasons ranging from medical conditions to old age. Cataracts, glaucoma, progressive retinal atrophy, and su...
10/08/2021

occur for reasons ranging from medical conditions to old age. Cataracts, glaucoma, progressive retinal atrophy, and suddenly acquired retinal degeneration (SARDS) are often-seen causes of . https://maxwellpet.com/dog%20eyesight%20problems

  soothes skin-related issues associated with seasonal allergies. Our natural formula helps your pet maintain a normal i...
29/07/2021

soothes skin-related issues associated with seasonal allergies. Our natural formula helps your pet maintain a normal inflammatory response, so he (and you) can enjoy summer to its fullest. https://maxwellpet.com/products/Skin-and-Allergy

Address


Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Maxwell Pet posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to Maxwell Pet:

Videos

Shortcuts

  • Address
  • Telephone
  • Alerts
  • Contact The Business
  • Videos
  • Claim ownership or report listing
  • Want your business to be the top-listed Pet Store/pet Service?

Share