
21/06/2025
More false information from the currupt idealist rspca.
Minutes from the meeting of the dog working group of SAWC on 19th Nov 2024 (see first comment) show that Paula Boyden, Veterinary Director at Dogs Trust, Dr Harvey Carruthers, veterinary surgeon, Dr Ellie Wigham, Lecturer in Veterinary Public Health, University of Glasgow, and Mike Flynn, by then former Chief Superintendent at the Scottish SPCA were present. They discussed whether there is any evidence on welfare issues associated with the use of prong collars. You might think vets would be able to give an indication of how often treatment is required for problems caused by prong collars (practically never) compared to tracheal and spinal injuries caused by the greater force required to control a dog using an ordinary flat collar. Instead they decide that Paula (remember veterinary director of Dogs Trust) should contact Dogs Trust and RSPCA (not SSPCA?) to see if there is any existing evidence regarding welfare issues around the use of prong collars. Now they have already established that Dogs Trust are opposed to use of tools including prong collars and RSPCA say on their website (see image) "Prong collars are painful and unethical training collars".They offer no supporting evidence and I suspect there is negligible case experience to suggest that. Does that sound like a balanced and objective approach to finding evidence? The RSPCA also have to throw in a comment about "shock" collars on a page that is supposed to be about prong collars - just cannot help themselves.