11/08/2022
👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
The popularity of Pit Bulls and why this is so problematic:
I am sure that this post will garner a fair amount of negative response, but at this point I am more afraid of the consequences of not speaking out than I am of the anger that may come my way for daring to say what so many of my colleagues feel, but keep silent about for fear of censure.
The reality is that almost daily we get requests for help from people who have either bought or adopted Pit Bulls and Pit Bull mixes and are reaching out due to the following:
1. They have more than one dog of this type and they are now fighting and doing serious damage to each other.
2. They have one of these dogs that has done serious damage to another dog in the family.
3. They have had to separate their dogs due to fighting, but now want them back together.
4. They can no longer walk their dog, because it has done damage to another dog on walks.
5. They have adopted a dog of this type and want the dog “socialised” as it shows reactivity to other dogs.
We have dealt with so many of these cases that it has gotten to a point where we are wanting to simply refuse to get involved anymore, because these situations are far too predictable and can seldom be resolved to the satisfaction people are hoping for. Something needs to change and if those of us who deal with this on a daily basis are not willing to speak up, it is unlikely that they will and we will be responsible for people making the same mistakes over and over again.
I am not sure where the idea has come from that Pit Bulls and Pit Bull mixes are such great companion animals and the most idealised family dogs. Were they popularised by the Dog Whisperer and his awful TV show? Is it simply that there are so many of them spilling out from communities where they are still used for fighting and as a status symbol, that they now comprise the majority of dogs in shelters and so rescue organisations have done a massive PR campaign in order to get them adopted? Or is it that they have become a good way for people to feel they are championing an “underdog” and fighting against prejudice, because people mistakenly equate the reality of breed predisposition with racial prejudice and bigotry?
Perhaps it is a combination of all of these things, but I am constantly dismayed by extremely kind, loving and well-meaning people such as:
• The young, active person who wants a pit bull as a partner for recreation and expects the dog to run free on the mountain and beaches, visit coffee shops and attend social functions at friends’ homes
• The young couple wanting to get their first dog before they start a human family who been told that pit bulls are wonderful with kids
• The person who falls in love with the idea of rescuing an “underdog” with a difficult past
• The young family who goes to adopt a puppy, and are told that breed does not matter
• The person with the big heart who keeps adding more and more dogs to their home, believing that they will all get on, regardless of type and history, if they are simply given enough love
• The caring husband and father who believes that a pit bull will keep his family safe from intruders and be a great companion for the kids
While no one disputes the idea that herding breeds are predisposed to herd, guarding breeds are predisposed to guard, pointers tend to point, retrievers like to hold things in their mouths and terriers like to hunt small critters, for some reason most people do not seem able to accept the fact that dogs that have been selectively bred to fight and kill each other might just be good at doing just that and MORE EASILY drawn into that type of behaviour pattern than another type of dog. This does not mean that these dogs are “evil”, it does not mean that there are absolutely no exceptions, it does not mean that no other type of dog is capable of doing harm to other dogs and it does not mean that a well-managed dog of this type may not make a loving companion for someone who accepts the risks and learns to mitigate them. However, it does mean that for the average person, acquiring a dog of this type is bringing a dog into their home that presents a HIGHER risk than many other types of dogs they could have chosen.
What is most concerning is that the majority of the people who end up in these situations do not intentionally choose this increased risk: they are often kind-hearted people who simply have no idea that the risk exists, because they have been told fairy tales by rescue organisations, believed some nonsense they have seen on TV or had no reason to doubt the “it’s all how you raise them” mantra. This is so grossly unfair and my heart breaks when we have to be the ones to tell caring people hard truths such as that their dogs may never be able to live freely together again, that their dogs fighting poses an enormous risk to their young children and the dogs may need to be rehomed or that they cannot ever let their dog off lead in public or allow it to interact with other dogs again.
Few people want to hear these things or live like that. Few people would ever deliberately choose this reality for themselves, their dogs and their families. Yes, I do realise that there are never any 100% guarantees when getting any dog of any type from any source at any age, BUT are we really going to deny that there are not factors that increase the risk of having a dog with dog-dog aggression? Why would we lie to ourselves and to others? Who are we trying to protect by going along with this – or are we just protecting ourselves from an unpopular and uncomfortable truth?
Is it not time to warn people that acquiring a dog that has been selectively bred for dog-dog aggression (and not defensive type aggression, but rather “gameness” or predatory type aggression) that they are INCREASING THEIR RISK of having a dog that gets into serious fights with other dogs in the home, that does not get along with other dogs at all and that is likely to do very serious damage to other dogs and any humans that happen to get in the way if they do get into a fight? If we kindly warn people and they choose the risk, that is their responsibility, but if we remain silent and they make a choice not knowing the risk, then surely we are partly responsible for the problems they may end up facing. I for one, do not want to bear that responsibility anymore, so I am speaking out motivated by compassion, not judgement - I hope this post will be received in this way.