07/07/2024
I came across a fascinating excerpt from "The Complete Training of Horse and Rider In the Principles of Classical Horsemanship" by Alois Podhasky this morning. (POST 1 of 2 continued...)
BRIEF SUMMARY HERE:
**In the 18th century, French riding master de la Guérinière wrote a revolutionary book on riding that was clear and easy to understand. His teachings focused on simplicity and facts, and were later preserved and applied at the Spanish Riding School in Vienna. The French Revolution and Napoleon's wars led to the decline of riding academies in Europe, but the Spanish Riding School continued to uphold de la Guérinière's methods. His influence spread to Germany through Max Ritter von Weyrother and his disciples, who resisted the teachings of Baucher and Fillis, which emphasized overbending and unnatural movements.**
PERSONAL THOUGHTS:
The statement above indicates Podhasky is referencing Baucher's 1st manner as his 2nd manner particularly reduced the bend to an 1/8th of a flexion (personally I am not a fan of his 1st manner as it seems quite brutal in nature, but I do admire certain aspects from his 2nd manner myself).
This is fascinating because it shows that the Classical Schools have gotten muddled and mixed over the centuries and nothing is truly pure. Even the Spanish Riding School has become muddled in recent decades as was the big controversy brought to light in recent years. It would do well to remember nothing is truly pure, and things rarely stay the same, one only needs to review footage of the Spanish Riding School during the time of Pdhasky and compare to footage today to see the stark contrast...
Influence will happen as time goes on, it's simply human nature. We can use words to create arguments of French vs German Classical etc, but not so very long ago it seems German was more French than the French and yet the roles seem to have reversed several times over despite pockets of individuals the world over declaring only they have it right and all others are wrong. There is a bit of irony in that, don't you think?
ORIGINAL TEXT BELOW:
"In the beginning of the eighteenth century the art of riding was almost exclusively influenced by France. And it was the great riding master de la Guériniére who produced the most revolutionary book on riding of all times. Unlike the writings of his predecessors, his book is clear and easy to understand. He based it on simplicity and facts in order to be completely understood by his readers. There is no need to discuss Guériniére's teachings in detail in this work, not because they are not sufficiently interesting, but because they are applied unalteted at the Spanish Riding School and may be seen there in daily use.
With the French Revolution the doctrines of Guériniére were lost to Frence. Moreover, the Napoleon's wars brought to an end the riding academies of the various courts of Europe. Only the Spanish Riding Achool in Vienna faithfully preserved up to the present day the methods of Guériniére. This was due chiefly to the influence of Max Ritter von Weyrother, an outstanding horseman who was head rider at the School during the early part of the nineteenth century. His influence, which spread far beyond the confines of his country, was particularly felt in Germany, where Siedler, and even more so, Seeger and Oeynhausen were his disciples. They were powerful enough to withstand the teachings of Baucher and to establish their methods so firmly that, later, Plinzner and Fillis could not influence the riding in this country. Steinbrecht's book, published in 1885, was also based on their teaching.
Plinzner, who worked in the Royal Stables in Berlin from 1874 onwards, overbent his horses, as Baucher did, and destroyed any forward urge. His followers made excuses for his methods because he trained horse's for Emperor William II of Germany, who had a withered arm and had to ride with one hand.
James Fillis was introduced to Baucher's methods in France. He then spent twelve years as a riding master at the Military Academy in Petrograd and made his first appearance in Germany in a circus in 1892. He captivated the spectators at the circus and found many followers among riders who would have liked to see his methods employed in the training of military chargers. Without doubt Fillis was a great artist, but interested more in the field of circus riding than in the art of classical equitation, in which all movements are based on the laws of nature. The proof of this is shown by the many unnatural movements which he practiced, such as the canter on three legs, and the canter backward. In 1913 Fillis died in Paris, as forgotten as his teacher, Baucher, while the methods of the Spanish Riding School still flourish.
Up to the beginning of the First World War the German Cavalry School at Hannover was under the influence of the Spanish Riding School through its former head rider Gebhart.
This historical development of riding reveals that the art is not confined to any special country. It flourishes wherever human beings dedicate themselves to horsemanship and know how to cultivate and develop its practice, wherever there are experts, and wherever such skill brings pleasure to those who love beauty. The art of riding is indeed international; it belongs to the civilized world, and it is the duty of every nation to preserve and foster it in the interest of culture."