24/09/2024
Aversive trainers. We know they're out there. We know they believe vehemently that punishment and tools that rely on pain or force are necessary in dog training.
But it would be nice to think they wouldn't hide behind the positive reinforcement label in order to incorrectly sell their services and get clients, wouldn't it? It's completely unfair to those dog guardians who only want to access ETHICAL training to have to deal with being lied to and manipulated to get their money.
Thankfully dog guardians are becoming more clued up on what training they'd like to receive for their dog. Taking away a clients' right to pick appropriately is completely disrespectful.
How can you check whether a trainer relies on punishment based techniques if they aren't up front about it?
🐾 Ask to see videos of them working with a dog with similar issues to your own highlighting what the main intervention is at that time
🐾 Ask them what training bodies they are accredited with and research them
🐾 Look at their social media pages AND look deeply into their reviews. Often if they aren't clear about it, past clients are and will mention things like "fixed with 1 session" or "corrected the behaviour" etc.
🐾 Ask them straight out whether you will be encouraged to use tools such as slip leads, citronella collars, pet correctors etc.
I'm hearing of a lot of people getting ripped off at the moment, including this poor client who paid good money to be conned.
Knowledge is power. I LOVE it when I'm grilled on my techniques before being employed. I will never EVER promise you I can "fix" your dog. (And anyone making that promise will go to all lengths to achieve that result and some of those levels will be harmful to your dog). But I WILL promise you to not cause them further harm. For me that's most important. Not how "successful" your session was. But indeed, how they are FEELING about the intervention.
Any trainer willing to lie about their methods clearly disrespects BOTH ends of the lead.