29/11/2023
Breeds that make up the XL American Bully, Part 2... The American Staffordshire Terrier (AST) and the "nanny dog" myth.
Sharing is not allowed from private groups. To share go to Thrower Bullies and share from there.
Before we get into the Am Staff let’s speak on a few things. First, I should've included in Part 1 that one of the things the APBT also offered to the American Bully was paper hanging the Bullies, especially with the UKC, as American Pit Bull Terriers. Til this day many Bullies are still registered with UKC as APBT but UKC in 2013 accepted the American Bully as a breed and allowed many of those people to get their paper work transferred from APBT to American Bully as a way to separate the 2 breeds as much as possible.
Second, I should've also included in Part 1 that there is no such thing as "nanny dogs". This a lie turned myth. "Nanny dog" was not initially associated with the APBT. It was associated with the Staffordshire Bull Terrier (SBT) in the early 1800s as marketing to battle the bad rap the small English fighting dogs were getting in the public. Remember the smaller Staffordhshire Bull Terrier is the beginning of the APBT. The term “Nanny Dog” then made its way to the United States in the 1900's and got thrown on the APBT and the Am Staff. In 1971 the lie about "Nanny dogs" really got pushed by Miss Lillian Rant who was president of the Staffordshire Bull Terrier club and an editor for New York Times magazine. She claimed that staffs were once referred to as "nurse made dogs" due to how good they were with children, there was even the talk that SBT’s, APBT’s and Am Staffs use to be used to baby sit children when parents were away. In my opinion it was starting to be known as untrue but then with the popularity of the internet and especially social media, the myth of the “Nanny Dog” came back to life. Pit Bull dog groups and people who refer to the Staffordshire Bull Terrier, the American Pit Bull Terrier, the American Staffordshire Terrier and the American Bully all as “pitty”, “pibble”, etc are the main ones pushing this myth today as they are firm believers in the misconception that a dogs behavior is not due to the breed or how a dog is bred and that all these breeds are pit bulls as a general term. They are under the misconception that it's all about how you love or raise them. You won’t find too many research books making the “nanny dog” claim any longer.
Now, lets get into the American Staffordshire Terrier and it's contributions to the XL American Bully. The UKC started with the APBT in 1898. The ADBA started with the APBT in 1909. Both registries not only kept track of paper work and pedigrees but also kept track of wins and losses in the fight ring. Eventually in 1936 the AKC accepted the APBT due to it’s popularity and with many of the dogs being considered curs (non game and mentally unfit for the fight ring) and most being from the fighters to non fighters being extremely tolerant of humans the transition was made easier due to them still being great companions and working dogs for other uses. The fact is you can breed two proven gamedogs and be lucky if a litter of 6 has one that will prove itself to be game or worthy of gambling your time and money on it being successful in the fight ring. This doesn’t mean they lack the ability or desire for the fight ring genetically. It just means they will probably quit due to injury, stamina or the survival instinct to turn and run if the pressure gets to be too much for them. Much of this new acceptance by the AKC was due to a charismatic Pit Bull named Petey who won over the hearts of America in 1927 due to a TV show with a bunch of little kids called Our Gang, also known as The Little Rascals. Back then there were no animal rights groups monitoring animals in TV shows. Many films regarding dogs from the original Old Yeller, Lassie and others allowed dogs to fight other dogs and animals on camera. Most times the dog fighting people or an animal on film was different from the dog being used during acting. When it came to Petey this was different, he was an APBT, he was able to do both. When it came to Our Gang, Petey loved the group of kids he hung around and defended them from mean adults, donkeys and anything else the story line and TV show wanted Petey to fight. The AKC had to capitalize off this breed that they once looked down on and it's new growing popularity but didn’t want to keep the word “Pit” in the name American Pit Bull Terrier due to “pit” referring to the fighting ring aka the fighting pit. After tossing back and forth many names they accepted the American Pit Bull Terrier into the AKC but changed the name a couple times and eventually stuck to the name "American Staffordshire Terrier", out of respect for it’s original heritage from the Staffordshire Bull Terrier and focused it on the showring. Making it less game, less prey and condition driven yet extremely functional but more b***d and having more mass as the showring and the pet world prefers in all breeds. The increased size is more impressive to the eye aesthetically, especially when it comes to working dogs that aren’t being required to work.
By breeding for 2 different purposes and looks the APBT and the AST went two different directions. Some say they are still the same breed. Some say their genetics is exactly the same while other veterinarian scientists say they have slightly altered. Other veterinarians have pointed out the Am Staff has become more susceptible to diseases that were never a factor in the APBT. I’m not a scientist and our popular breed test companies aren’t equipped for that type of break down but with years of being around both breeds and working them, there is definitely a difference in temperament, ability and look which is the 3 things that make up a dog breed.
This is not new among breeds. The Cocker Spaniel in America is smaller, has a shorter muzzle, rounded skull and a deeper stop than the original English dogs imported to the U.S. In the 1930’s their parent club pushed the idea of not mixing the 2 types. By 1946 the AKC split the Cocker Spaniel into an American and English version and considered them 2 different breeds. Earlier than this the Cane Corso and the Neapolitan Mastiff went different directions. The Neo ended up being more aesthetically extreme with the wrinkles, bone and mass for showrings while the Cane Corso remained more stream lined.
The APBT and Am Staff are no different. The American Staffordshire Terrier over the last 80 years has developed a more calm temperament, has 0 the purpose, less the ability and carries a heavier body style and head than the APBT. Though the Am Staff can perform most of the legal work done by the APBT, many say it has developed into a separate breed and I agree. Here’s why, regardless of genetics, DNA and the scientific stuff, the most important thing about dogs is not what we see with a microscope but what we see standing in front of us. For example, the genetic color markers for black and tans is the same as tri dogs but when standing in front of us we can see the difference regardless of color genetics. The best rules for differences among dogs and breeds is to understand that ,as previously stated, there are 3 categories that make up a breed 1. Ability/Purpose, 2. Temperament/Behavior and 3. Aesthetics/Structure. When you neglect, purpose/ability and temperament to only focus on aesthetics you lose the essence of the species and why man even created it. You lose the ability and intelligence that was required for the job it required to be mans companion in it's designated category or activity. If the only redirection is the showring or the pet world the dog and the breeds that make up the species become shells of what they once were, losing cognition, ability and often health due to reversing the purpose in it’s creation without replacing it with another purpose. The only way to counter this is to form a standard of ability that is related to the original activity/purpose in body and mind of that breed. If it is a new breed, then the breeds used to create it must be respected and set the standard of ability, purpose and temperament or you'll lose what made those breeds special and what they have to offer to your new breed otherwise you create a lessor dog/breed.
Nature is the ultimate executioner when man rebelliously goes against what use to be common sense and nature punishes by increasing disease, reducing life span, functionality and lowering cognition. Mind follows body and body follows mind.
The formula for breeding is form follows function, function follows purpose, purpose follows the breeder so you can avoid losing traits if a new purpose or redirection is given. This is why so many Am Staffs excel at sporting activities and competitions and it is great for them as an outlet. With dogfighting being illegal the pit bull can be maintained through old school “keep” methods and dogs improving over generations, hog catching, etc and paying attention to aesthetics though there were some variation from more terrier to more working bulldog traits.
When it comes to the Am Staff it is now a different dog 80 plus years later than the dog before, the APBT, which is still thriving today but in much smaller circles. There are some that say different breeds were introduced into the Am Staff to bulk them up a bit more than the APBT, such as the American Bulldog and a few others. I don’t know for sure but I do agree. I can also see from the APBTs back then how there may have been enough dogs of a preferred look to not need to mix in other breeds but I think they did.
The UKC American Pit Bull Terrier and the AKC American Staffordshire Terrier have become the same dog. They also allow dogs to be registered as different breeds in each registry. So a dog can be dual registered with UKC as APBT and with AKC as Am Staff just as an American Bully may be registered with a Bully registry as American Bully but with UKC as a Pit Bull. The ADBA at one point remained more true to the original dog for their showring, even allowing them to face off with each other while controlled on leash to test their spirit and would register UKC dogs. If the UKC dog was also registered with AKC as an Am Staff then the ADBA would put an asterisk by their name. They would not register any dogs that came from AKC directly. I have heard they've relaxed these standards a bit but not sure exactly what the changes are.
The Am Staff is an extremely energetic dog. Very fast, agile and athletic. Great for most types of work and ready to go. More and more are seeming to become docile and even overweight with too much mass but there are still great driven specimens out there due to their original heritage. In some, their fight drive can still be high but drops dramatically when they get into it with a dominant or fight driven dog of other breeds. Most Am Staffs do great in family environments and do well with other pets, especially if raised with them.
The Am Staff is overall heavier than the APBT, thicker b***d and carrying more mass. They are often given cropped ears but that’s a preference. The APBT typcially has it's full ears.
It has been said that the American Bully is the cross between the Am Staff and the APBT. This makes 0 sense. This would just produce an Am Staff (watered down Pit Bull) or a mixed breed. Other breeds had to be mixed in to make the American Bully a true breed plus get to the look, sizes and temperaments we see today so quickly. We will be going into these other breeds in parts 3-7 of this series. The Am Staff offers most the colors and patterns we see in the XL, especially the blue coat due to so many Am Staffs being strictly bred to be blue in the 90's even though they may have been called and registered as Blue APBT's or "blue nose". The blue dogs that once did fight are long gone due to be bred winner to winner and crossed with most the winners that weren't blue. Regardless of the myth that they didn't fight. For them to remain blue the focus had to switch from winning fights to maintaining their color, this is where the blue dogs went the same route as the Am Staff of being bred for looks, thicker bone, mass, etc.
The Am Staff also offers the XL American Bully the drives required in similar physical activities that were used in a “keep” (the exercise and conditioning period used for gamedogs 1-2 months before a match) such as flirt pole, spring pole, etc.
The Classic class American Bully and the classic style American Bully has tended to, til recently, resemble the Am Staff more than the other classes. By American Bully standards and just dogs in general there’s a classic style in every breed due to the showring in all breeds and some pet breeders tend to aim for more mass in all breeds while others prefer a state more natural to the breed or species. In my opinion the Classic class is sort of unnecessary especially with it being the same height as the Standard class with the same look and style showing up in the Pocket class and the XL class too. When it’s all said and done, due to the this truth of the classes and other breeds that usually just bring more mass or color pattern, it’s the am staff that provides the option to keep the dogs clean, driven and functional. In my opinion through training various American Bullies, the further you get from the Am Staff look, not size, but overall look, the more you loose health, functionality and cognition. The dogs with more bulldog traits don't seem to learn as fast, live as long and tend to be lazier, the dogs with more mastiff traits do seem to be more protective and slightly lazier. With the Am Staff being the foundation of the blood and concept of the American Bully, one has to decide what direction they want to go, not with just the Class but also the overall look as we see registries doing the samething. Many disagree with what direction the Bully should go as some prefer the older look (more Am Staff-ish) over the newer look of the last 10 years (more bulldog-ish).