In every aspect of teaching a dog, it's crucial to consider: will this approach diminish the dog's potential? There's a clear distinction between teaching a dog to perform a behavior willingly and forcing it to comply. While the behavior may appear the same, we must recognize that we're dealing with different dogs. My aim is to train dogs that actively participate in sessions, enabling them to reach their full potential. Conversely, a heavy-handed trainer relying on escape-avoidance techniques (positive punishment/compulsion) may overlook this distinction because the dog completes the desired task.
Similarly, there's a significant difference between teaching a dog to cap or regulate its drives and forcing control upon them. When a dog learns to cap or regulate its drives, we nurture and preserve its innate potential.
Imagine a cup filling with water: once it overflows, it spills. In dogs, this overflow can result in breaking position or chasing prey due to an uncontrollable drive. This behavior isn't defiance or disobedience but rather an inability to regulate their drive. A dog taught to manage its drive retains the potential to pursue prey or seek rewards, unlike one solely motivated by avoiding pain or punishment.
This is a short video of a dog caping his drive for the reward. This can be powerful in teaching obedience.
Markers
I love the science and psychology behind dog training, so I’ll do my best to keep it concise.
In classical conditioning, a bridge marker (or simply a "bridge") is a signal or cue used to communicate to the subject (often an animal) that they have performed the correct behavior and that a reward is coming. This marker bridges the gap in time between the behavior occurring and the delivery of the reward. Common examples of bridge markers include a clicker sound or a verbal cue like "yes" or "good." The bridge marker itself does not provide the reward but serves as a precise signal that informs the subject about the exact moment they did the correct behavior. This technique is commonly used in animal training to shape behaviors effectively.
I will tell trainers and handlers to mark the desired behavior by saying 'good' or 'yes,' but when I look at the dog, there is no outward change in behavior.
indicating the marker has truly been conditioned.
In the video, you can see Rocky break position from the touch pad after the clicker, revealing he knows the reward is coming for the desired behavior (eye contact).
Well, if you made it this far, thanks for reading.
Handler Interference?
Handler Interference? This video won’t win me any awards, but I hope it paints a powerful illustration. This video is not meant to be definitive and say this is exactly what happens, but to help the handler recognize and understand how they can disrupt the searching environment for their dog.
Reward
Some of my favorite lines when I witness stuff like this are, “My dog has never done that before,” or, “He knows the release commands; he’s just not doing it,” and, “Oh, he does it for me.” If the dog has truly been proofed on the behavior, another handler should be able to give the command with no issues. If there are issues, there is more than likely an inadvertent cue the dog is relying on.
Building Odor Commitment Using Opposite Reflex
Building Odor Commitment Using Opposition Reflex
We can often get tunnel vision in scent detection by only focusing on the next productive areas to search and not realizing when the dog is in the scent cone or bracketing to the odor source. My ultimate goal is to build the dog's commitment so strong that the dog will be fighting to stay at or bracket to the source, even pulling the handler back.
Opposition reflex utilizes leash tension by applying slight back tension on the leash, then rewarding the dog. Markers allow you to mark the exact moment you apply tension or when the dog drives/pushes forward. At the beginning of this exercise/drill, it could be the most subtle tension, which is then released. After a few successful trials, you will notice that it takes stronger tension on the leash to achieve the same result. Notice the tension in the leash and when the tension is released.
Reward Conflict
In a different post, I mentioned the significance and importance of clear communication when training any task. In scent detection, I often see so much reward conflict with the dog after he has been rewarded for locating an odor. The handler does not offer much play and excitement and gives the “out” or “release” command. The dog will either release the reward and go back to work, or if he doesn’t, he gets a correction or positive punishment of some sort. In both scenarios, the dog does not realize he has the ability to earn it back, which is not favorable for the dog. I often say it is an elaborate game of keep away.
The aim of this exercise is to teach the dog he has the ability to get the reward back, but it will be under my terms as the handler. I will merely possess the reward, not pull or pry it, allowing the dog to loosen his bite and release the reward. It can be a waiting game, but once he releases it, I have to give the “Yes” marker to teach him he can earn it back by offering some play and interaction.
It’s important to alleviate any reward conflict when working on detection issues. Conflict can affect remedial training because you cannot get many trials or repetitions, and the dog's energy can be misdirected as it becomes a struggle to get the reward back.
Markers
Clear and effective communication is paramount in dog training. Marker training achieves this by precisely capturing moments in time, providing a clear picture of the desired behavior for the dog. While verbal markers can be effective, I've found that integrating a clicker during the foundational stages and introducing verbal markers later is beneficial. Novice trainers sometimes struggle with consistency in their use of verbal markers. For instance, they may yell 'Yes' after one successful repetition and say it softly after another, which can confuse the dog, leaving them to wonder which repetition was more important. Additionally, elongating the verbal marker, like 'Yesssssssss,' can further muddle communication. When I hear it drawn out, I often joke and look around, asking if there's a snake nearby. In contrast, the clicker consistently emits the same tone and frequency every time, providing a clear message to the dog and often accelerating training progress.
The video below illustrates the consistent tone of the clicker and the contrasting differences with the verbal marker.
Heel
In another old non-scent detection video, I aim to emphasize the power of markers. Any training technique can hinder progress if relied upon for too long. I often observe this with the 'heel,' where trainers excessively lure with rewards and fail to properly phase them out. This creates a reliance on rewards to accomplish the heel.
To be effective, clear communication with the dog is essential. A 'marker' is needed to pinpoint the exact moment the dog performs a desired task. Without a marker, training in any task can be challenging as actions become muddled for the dog. While clear to humans, it's confusing for the dog. Ideally, even a non-dog training person should be able to understand the intent of a session.
In this heel demonstration, which isn't perfect, I relied solely on free shaping without luring. When the dog approached me, I marked the moment and continued to mark as she moved closer or pivoted toward me. It's all about striking the right balance between guidance and independence.
Think of training like a flip book. Each time you use a marker, it captures a page to reach the desired task. The steps should progress methodically, making the page/task trained fluidly."
Open Area
Every proficient trainer has a distinct style they employ with both their own dogs and those they train. I place significant emphasis on utilizing markers in detection training. Training in open areas constitutes the latter part of the foundational training process. The distinct imprint of my training can be observed in two different dogs
Shaping
An older training video but was shaping the final response. Markers capture the exact moment in time for the dog. The dog is not left to guess why/how he got rewarded. A lot of times I hear handlers say oh I was using markers, saying good and yes. The “Yes” or clicker is a terminal marker. You can see how quick the dog broke to receive his reward. Many trainers don’t truly condition markers for their dog as it’s evident when you say the marker and the dog shows no change/or breaks position to come to the handler for the reward. If you were to throw/lob the reward at source your timing will always be off. Even if it’s only 0.5 -1 second the timing is off. With precision you can paint a clear picture to the dog which can accelerate the training process. To a degree the dog is left to wonder what he was being rewarded for. Aldo anticipation behaviors can develop from throwing/lob the reward. Every style has its pitfalls and markers often are misunderstood. Often handlers/trainers do not proof time, distance and duration when using markers and will blame marker training for the reason their dog is “leaving odor”. #K9 #k9training #scentdetectiondog #operantconditioning #workingdogsofig #workingdogs
I do plan on making mostly scent detection videos. I thought of one of my mentors when I first started to understand the power of using markers in training. He said your heel is your signature move. You can tell who takes pride in their obedience if you look at a trainer’s heel work with their dog. At the beginning of the video was working on teaching hindquarters awareness. Benji would get rewarded for moving his hindquarters with the slightest movement. The video breaks to the progression. The final progression was a significant amount of time later as I was just messing around when I was taking a break from graduate school.
Markers
The case for marker training in detection. The first dog was trained using the traditional reward at source. (Throwing the reward to the source of odor). You can see the anticipation behaviors in the dog. Great dogs can be trained this way but one throw of the reward too hard or too soft will cause anticipation behaviors like in the video. The following dogs after the first clip were taught markers later and incorporated in training. The markers allow you to mark the exact moment in time and not have to worry about making a bad throw with the reward. When you throw the reward your timing will always be off. With this style of training it is important to proof time, distance and duration with the markers.
Benji
"There is a significant distinction between teaching a dog to do something and forcing a dog to do something. While you may achieve the same result, it comes at what cost? The goal of dog training should be to instruct a dog in a task without diminishing any of the dog’s potential. We should aim to have the dog actively participate in the training session. I employ a training method that communicates to the dog that he is about to engage in a session where it has the potential to receive a reward, thereby making it an active participant. In this older video featuring Benji, you can observe his increased drive and energy, indicating his readiness to engage in the session.
Remedial training.
Just a retired Air Force handler who loves detection. This video shows me assisting a military dog before my retirement. I hope it may be helpful to some. You can check out my page; I'll be posting other detection videos soon, where I'll use odors like ScentLogix, True Scent, or Sokks.
Been a long time but getting Benji ready for some nose work trials in the near future.