28/09/2021
A Dog is a Dog is a Dog is a Dog
**
Anthropomorphism pops up in dog training circles. It is defined as 'the attribution of human characteristics or behaviours to a god, animal, or object'
It basically means we tend to attribute human characteristics to dogs.
The main one that is used to demonstrate this is the 'guilty look'. Dogs do not feel guilt so saying they look guilty is a prime example of anthropomorphism.
However, I think it runs much deeper than this
***
How many people hear the phrase 'I use the prong collar because he needs to learn that pulling is wrong' or 'I correct her because she needs to learn that what she is doing is wrong'.
What is wrong?
Does a dog have a concept of right or wrong?
No they don't
These are human constructs.
This is anthropomorphism.
Dogs are fairly simple. They do more of what is rewarding and less of what is aversive.
(For example, if you touch a hot stove, you learn that doing so is aversive...but is it wrong to touch the hot stove?)
Dogs do not learn right or wrong. They have no concept of morality. They do not have higher reasoning. They simple learn that situations are either rewarding or aversive.
If a dog pulls on the lead and you have a prong collar on, they learn pulling is aversive. Eventually, they learn dogs they see on walks are aversive, cars are aversive.....going out the front door is aversive. They don't learn pulling is wrong. The dog is just trying to walk at their natural pace and trying to get to exciting things in the environment. Is that wrong?
As force free trainers, and because dogs do more of what is rewarded, we focus more on rewarding positions, rewarding giving in to lead pressure, rewarding slow walking. Dogs understand things that are rewarding. Dogs understand the acquisition of food. They understand doing behaviours which are profitable.
What about another phrase we hear?
**
“You have to punish aggression, the police don’t let you stab people on a Saturday night, you get put in prison'
I've stopped watching aversive trainers on Facebook. I cannot stand watching the severe abuse that happens in them, knowing what happens months down the line when the cameras aren't on.
I am sick of seeing aggression and reactivity being portrayed as willful disobedience and being subsequently punished as such.
Dogs are not capable of being willfully disobedient. That means they have to know what you want and choose not to do it deliberately for the sole reason it is what you want.
Dogs do not care what you want.
They care about what they want.
In situations where they are showing aggression, they usually (but not always) want the scary thing to go away and are acting in the only way they know how to make it do so.
To me this is the most dangerous anthropomorphism of all. Using punishment to suppress behaviours shown in severely anxious states because it benefits the humans.
Until one day the dog tips over threshold and, having learnt their threat displays are punished, goes straight for the bite.
Either the trigger or your leg. Whichever is closer.
Dogs should be treated as dogs. Aggression is detrimental usually so why do they feel, in their inner canine cost/benefit calculators, that it is necessary? That needs exploring.
Not just taking the batteries out of the smoke alarm because it is more convenient for the owners.
**
'Using treats is bribery'
Is it? Can a dog understand the deep moral and manipulative tactics needed to partake in bribery? Or have they learnt that it is only profitable because they will only get the reward if it is in your hand.
Have you taught the splinter skills needed to ensure your dog performs behaviours without needing to see the treat.
Somebody asked at a dog show recently why Lyra was so calm and well behaved. Simple, because it is profitable for Lyra to be so. I pay her, in food, for performing behaviours I like....such as lying calmly by me while I have a conversation. This isn't her extorting me. This is reinforcement of behaviour.
Obviously I am not shovelling food into her mouth every three seconds but I pay her for behaviours I want to see more of and so I see more of those behaviours.
That is science...not extortion.
Lyra is not capable of master manipulation of humans
She is a dog, and if I treat her as anything other than a dog I do her a massive disservice.
Lyra is beautiful, she is clever, she is sweet and loving. Same as my Edward. I love them dearly. I call them my babies ❤
I also respect them for the excellent, fun, unique species they are.
A dog is a dog is a dog.
It is important we treat them as such