23/10/2019
Why don't my horses feet look like the pictures?
So you've been scrolling Facebook ( you know you're procrastinating right?) You've found a horse related post on Facebook that concerns hooves. Said product/poster/pseudo-expert promises that your horse can be better if you only invest in their service, product or witchcraft.
Sounds great right? I mean, you're not happy with how your horses feet look at the moment and your friends constantly remind about how long his toes are. It's obvious to everyone that your current farrier just isn't up to the task and add to that the fact he/she has the personality of a church fence; who came blame you for dreaming!
You're intrigued but the investigative journalist in you needs proof. You need definitive proof that what they're selling is what you're inadvertently in need of purchasing. You scroll on..... There, there it is! Proof! Luckily the advertiser has judiciously included the holy grail of unintended ignorance -- before and afters! They've taken what looks to be a terribly neglected hoof that was receiving sub-optimal hoof care and they've transmogrified it into the pinnacle of happy horse hoof health.
It's no secret that I'm not a fan of these kind of posts and any one of my clients will attest to the general disdain injected into any discussion surrounding the purported benefits of (XYZ) products being touted as the new be-all and end-all of equine excellence. Perhaps this is a failing on my behalf however and I feel I owe you a debt to explain just why this gets under my skin so much.
Hoof care as an industry is subject to the same injection of pseudo-science as any other aspect of life, even more so when you add a sprinkling of emotional attachment and animal welfare. Unfortunately/fortunately (I'll explain, hang in there) this is the problem.
We all want to do well by our horses. We all want the very best for their health and well-being. There are a plethora of people/companies all too happy to sell you this dream, at a price of course. Does that mean I am anti industry? Definately not. There's a time and a place for everything and some of these products even hold valid claims of benefit.
Hoof health is an incredibly subjective field and I'm incredibly dubious of anyone who is happy to sell fanciful ideals. The ugly truth is we've bred a species with little to no regard for hoof health, developed management and pasture strategies that directly and negatively impact hoof health but then to top it off we ask super human like performance from an animal not designed to withstand the rigors we place upon them. Poor conformation, poor feeding programs, poor riding, poor pasture, all these play into the actual health of the hoof itself.
Now here comes the farrier. I come along every 4-6 weeks and trim your horse, sometimes I even throw a shoe over my trim. I play the arbiter between you and your horse who is on a self destruct mission and God only knows what'll give out first, him/her or your wallet. 4-6 weeks of damage done to a foot and yet I show up with my superman cape expecting to fix all your woes.
It's comforting and reasonable to think, as an owner, that I've got all the answers. Sit down for this part ~ I don't have a clue! I'm using my experience, very limited knowledge of the fundamental sciences and a magic 8 ball to decide the best course of action for your horse which, might I add, seems to change every damned visit.
But Kyal! You're a qualified farrier! You should know this stuff!!! I trust my horses in your care! Anyone remember what I did to my own thumb a few weeks back with a powersaw? At this point in my life I'm not sure I trust myself to fart without a handful of spare underwear.
Hoof morphology and pathology follows somewhat set patterns, this is true. We can use fancy words like the Centre of Pressure (CoP) Centre of Rotation (CoR) and Centre of Body Mass (you guessed it, CoBM) as biomechanical markers to measure an estimation of locomotive effects upon balance (and vis versa) but we really haven't established the long term efficacy of such protocols nor even the proper short term usage.
I often hear the 'traditional' aspects of farriery spoken of with disdain. Tradition becomes tradition because it works. Empirical (experience based) evidence is a very pertinent and valid form of scientific observation and it pains me to see it treated with such disregard in favour of "new" technology. Now I should clarify here, I'm far from anti progression. I want to see this industry go forward in leaps and bounds. What I don't want to see is this perpetual cycle of crap masquerading as fact trying to undermine actionable knowledge.
My wish is to see new knowledge, products and innovation add to and compliment existing practice, not replace it. Like it or lump it the basics of shoeing horses have survived the test of hundreds, arguable thousands of years not because we had no other alternative but because it bloody well works!