11/07/2022
Brave pants grumpy behaviour consultant Public service announcement ! This has been on my mind a lot. Please give your horse credit for the intelligent AND affiliative animals that they are.
At the risk of offending a few people. The problem with a lot of N/H or similar training methods or systems widely utilised in the horse world is that they are falsely labelled as “authentic connection” or relationship building when they have nothing at all to do with how horses actually create friendships. In fact they are the antithesis of this. It is instead that join up and other exercises or games are sold as being based on connection and affiliative behaviour when in fact they are based solely on agonistic interactions. It is a gross misrepresentation of equine affiliative behaviours that misleads many unsuspecting and well meaning horse caregivers and even trainers who were taught these methods . In addition the assumption that horses do not have the intelligence to recognise we are not horses persists such as mimicking their behaviour and using sticks or other equipment to represent their tail for example so that we can “communicate as if we were horses”. Whilst some social strategies such as walking in sync (synchrony and mutual movement)and proximity can be carried over misapplication of sticks or chasing represent agonistic interactions and not ways of connecting. Horses are very capable of recognising different herd members as well as different people ( Hausberger et al,2019, Lampe et al,2012, d’ingeo et al,2019) insulting their intelligence is not conducive to positive relationships. There is also a whole wonderful world of communication and exploration outside of learning theory where we can have shared experiences .
The use of join up and other techniques frequently applied by some proponents of Natural Horsemanship are based on agonistic interactions and not affiliative ones as often claimed (McGreevy et al., 2009, Hartmann et al., 2017). When these techniques are used the risk of causing depressive states, creating psychological trauma or re-traumatisation is high.
The dog world has a much lower tolerance for the use of aversive equipment and dominance based practice than the horse world does . Maybe it’s time the horse world started to catch up ?
References
Fureix, C., Bourjade, M., Henry, S., Sankey, C., & Hausberger, M. (2012). Exploring aggression regulation in managed groups of horses Equus caballus. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 138(3-4), 216-228.
Hartmann, E., Christensen, J. W., & McGreevy, P. D. (2017). Dominance and leadership: useful concepts in human–horse interactions?. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science, 52, 1-9.
Hausberger, M., Roche, H., Henry, S., & Visser, E. K. (2008). A review of the human–horse relationship. Applied animal behaviour science, 109(1), 1-24.
Henry, S., Sigurjónsdóttir, H., Klapper, A., Joubert, J., Montier, G., & Hausberger, M. (2020). Domestic Foal Weaning: Need for Re-Thinking Breeding Practices?. Animals, 10(2), 361.
d’Ingeo, S., Quaranta, A., Siniscalchi, M., Stomp, M., Coste, C., Bagnard, C., ... & Cousillas, H. (2019). Horses associate individual human voices with the valence of past interactions: a behavioural and electrophysiological study. Scientific reports, 9(1), 1-10.
Kieson, E., Lundgren, K., & Abramson, C. I. Preliminary Findings of Observations of Affiliative and Stress Behaviors in Large Horse Herds with Variations in Resources. In 15th Annual Conference for the International Society for Equitation Science, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
https://medwinpublishers.com/IZAB/a-preliminary-investigation-of-preferred-affiliative-interactions-within-and-between-select-bonded-pairs-of-horses-a-first-look-at-equine-love-languages.pdf?fbclid=IwAR2Gjh8MmzAtZp8Xlt4RB_j-fVJizcBU3TcoUqcAtMWB63tut5L_OGtL5QE&fs=e&s=cl
Lampe, J. F., & Andre, J. (2012). Cross-modal recognition of human individuals in domestic horses (Equus caballus). Animal cognition, 15(4), 623-630.
McGreevy, P., Oddie, C., Burton, F. L., & McLean, A. N. (2009). The horse–human dyad: Can we align horse training and handling activities with the equid social ethogram?. The Veterinary Journal, 181(1), 12-18.
Pierard, M., McGreevy, P., & Geers, R. (2019). Effect of density and relative aggressiveness on agonistic and affiliative interactions in a newly formed group of horses. Journal of Veterinary Behavior, 29, 61-69.
Rees, L. (2017). Horses in Company. The Crowood Press.
Sigurjónsdóttir, H., & Haraldsson, H. (2019). Significance of group composition for the welfare of pastured horses. Animals, 9(1), 14
©️Jessie Sams (2022) Animal Behaviour and Trauma Recovery Service