
08/07/2025
Double blind testing doesn't lie
I know some people believe that single blind testing is the same as double blind. That the assessor in no way could possibly influence an assessment. The only way to know though…
..Is to test under double conditions.
Only then can you truly say the dog can likely track in certain conditions reliably. Single blind testing will always have an element of doubt hanging over it.
Now, most dog sports conduct their certifications under single blind conditions. ANKC, IGP, and so on.
This is fine and sports should be respected in their own right, so long as no one makes the error of suggesting a dog with a single blind title can actually do that standard of track in reality (I'm sure some could, but if you think your dog can, then just do it double blind and see what happens!).
Some government agencies and SAR groups that use single blind testing as their certification standard, both domestically and overseas.
I'm sure many of these dogs go on to have many operational successes, and the handlers in these organisations work incredibly hard, no doubt. But I would ask why any organisation would accept such a low standard of certification when it's so easy to evaluate under double blind conditions?
Better to fail in training than in reality.
I am a believer in high standards and tracking assessments being done under conditions as close to reality as possible. Anyone who has responsibility for lives especially has a duty to ensure they have a dog as well prepared as possible for real world employment.