06/09/2024
Neurodivergence is a hot topic right now! And rightly so, because it's a useful and fascinating term! Before we can talk about what it means for dogs, we need to know what it IS.
There are a lot of really watered down or overly simplified definitions floating around on the internet, but if you look at the source material, here’s what you’ll find:
Neurodivergence is a sociological term that means, to quote leading autism rights activist and writer Lydia X. Z. Brown, “a brain outside of what most of society considers normal, healthy, stable, sane, or intelligent”. It was coined in 2000 by autistic activist Kassiane Asasumasu.
Neurodivergence is a term that exists outside of medical and scientific frameworks.
It is rooted in the social and radical models of disability, not the medical model or legal frameworks.
It builds off of liberation based movements like disability justice, consumer-survivor, q***r rights, and mad pride.
Like “q***r”, the term neurodivergence enables us to understand ourselves as part of a political class, and to question and challenge societal ideas of normalcy and dysfunction. It takes the focus off our individual non-normative brains and onto the ways society is built to privilege certain neurotypes.
Neurodivergence does not mean “ADHD and autism”. It is an umbrella term so that all of us with brains who are marginalized and medicalized can find community together, and seek liberation.
Discussions of neurodivergence in dogs should center neurodivergent speakers, and people with education and experience in areas such as critical disability studies, consumer-survivor & mad pride organizing, and autism and disability self advocacy.
Many of the issues that affect neurodivergent people (medicalization, the racist and colonial history of psychiatry, abusive behaviour modification practices, carceral “health care”, and more), affect dogs too.
And discussing the incredible diversity in dogs, and how we conceptualize normal vs abnormal, functional vs dysfunctional, in such a varied species can give us insight into how we uphold ableism in our society.
On the flip side, framing neurodivergence in a medical context is misleading, continues to uphold systems of power used to marginalize neurodivergent people, and further devalues the expertise of people with lived experience and/or education in the humanities.