06/05/2026
Low calorie doesn’t always mean low impact on the gut
Many “good doer” feeds are marketed around weight control, sugar and starch reduction — which sounds ideal for horses prone to weight gain, laminitis risk, or metabolic issues.
But from a microbiome perspective, it’s worth looking beyond the front label.
This type of formulation is typically built around:
Processed fibre sources (straw, oat hulls, soya hulls, beet pulp, wheatfeed)
Fortification layers (minerals, immune/hoof support, additives)
Palatability enhancers and functional sugars (including fructose/isomaltulose)
So what does that mean for the hindgut?
Potential positives:
Higher fibre intake can support fermentation and short-chain fatty acid production
Lower starch reduces the risk of rapid starch overflow into the hindgut
Beet pulp can be a useful fermentable fibre source for many horses
Potential considerations:
Highly processed fibre blends are not the same as diverse forage
Multiple ingredient fractions can create a “nutritionally complete” feed while still offering relatively poor microbial diversity support
Sweeteners, flavour enhancers and functional sugars may improve intake, but don’t necessarily improve microbiome resilience
Bucket volume can create a false sense of dietary adequacy while forage quality remains unchanged
A horse’s microbiome doesn’t read marketing claims.
The healthiest hindgut ecosystems are generally built on:
Forage diversity
Fibre complexity from whole ingredients
Consistency
Minimal unnecessary dietary complexity
A bucket feed may help manage calories, but it should never become the foundation of gut health.
Ask not just “is it low calorie?” but “what microbial environment is this actually feeding?”