24/10/2024
๐๐๐ช๐ฉ๐ง๐๐ก๐๐ฉ๐ฎ. The concept has become a bit of hot potato in the dog training world. It's sometimes seen as a 'red flag' and something to be avoided, resisted or criticised. But I think that's a mistake.
The concept of neutrality has been hijacked by coercive, force based trainers to mean the total suppression of natural behaviours; a robotic, unthinking obedience. They use the term to mean that a dog should interact, and react, minimally with their environment and should, instead, be focused only to their owner. But we shouldn't allow a helpful concept to be hijacked and misrepresented in that way.
๐๐๐๐ฉ ๐๐ค๐๐จ ๐ '๐ฃ๐๐ช๐ฉ๐ง๐๐ก' ๐๐ค๐ ๐ข๐๐๐ฃ? To me it isn't about a robotic indifference to the world around us. It's not about forbidding dogs to interact with anyone, ever. It's about teaching dogs to be aware of the normal, day to day happenings around them and to have a regulated, proportionate, appropriate response to those things. It's about teaching a dog how to interact appropriately and also be ok with not interacting. It's about a dog being able to stay in a regulated, level headed state of mind under normal conditions. It's about a dog being able to move through their world without feeling the need to react to, or get involved in, every little thing. It's not about feeling nothing; it's about having a proportionate & appropriate response to feelings. Neutrality is the opposite state of mind to overstimulation & disregulation.
What it doesn't (or shouldn't) mean is a dog who expresses no emotions ever. A dog who is expected to tolerate threatening or stressful situations. A dog who isn't allowed to interact with their environment and those in it. A dog who is expected to tolerate the intolerable. A dog who is isolated from their own species. That's not neutrality; that's coercive control.
To suggest that 'neutrality' is undesirable just because it's been hijacked & misrepresented as a concept by 'balanced' trainers risks throwing the baby out with the bathwater. And I think that would be a mistake.
Thoughts?