11/02/2023
THERE IS HOPE
After reading many comments on videos about the dog training crisis, I concluded:
Ivan Balabanov and Robert Cabral may be amazing and skilled trainers and champions but they are stuck in a place of ego that may serve their social media accounts, sponsors and 50 Billion Dollar industry, but not the dogs to the level they believe.
Their tools donât work in animal kingdom, only to dogs they get their tools on.
Does a prong or shock collar work on crocodiles ?
Does a prong or shock collar work on lions and elephant?
What Force free reinforcement can do:
Make a lion voluntarily gives his paw for nail trimming, and crocodile to wait patiently to get his ointment on his leg to name a few.
Ignoring scientific evidence, academics of animal veterinary and behavioral field, and welfare organizations are not traits of a champion or animal lover.
They are stuck in the beginning ( x mark on the diagram ) of their journey. I wish they can free themselves, as I was at that stage a decade ago buying into Iâm more advanced trainer and help dogs exit the shelter using aversion.
Meanwhile, they push for a âshock, choke and prongâ inclusive dog training regulation.
I wanted to share with you they root cause of the crisis as I perceive it.
THE ROOT PROBLEM
Dunning-Kruger Syndrome (DKS) is a cognitive bias in which individuals with low ability in a particular domain overestimate their skills and are unable to recognize their own incompetence. This syndrome was first described by psychologists David Dunning and Justin Kruger in 1999. DKS has been observed in a variety of domains, including intelligence, memory, math skills, and social skills.
To understand DKS, let us take the example of an aversive dog trainer. Aversive dog training involves the use of punishment, such as shock collars or choke chains, to train dogs. A trainer with DKS may overestimate their abilities and believe that their methods are effective, despite evidence to the contrary. They may be unable to recognize the harm their methods can cause to the dog, including physical and emotional harm. They may also dismiss alternative, positive reinforcement-based methods as ineffective or "soft."
Research has shown that individuals with DKS tend to be less accurate in their self-assessments of ability and performance. They also tend to be less receptive to feedback and less able to learn from mistakes. In the context of dog training, this can lead to harmful training practices that may not only harm the dog but also perpetuate the trainer's mistaken belief in their own abilities.
SOLUTION
To combat DKS in the field of dog training, it is essential to encourage trainers to engage in ongoing professional development, including learning about positive reinforcement-based methods and their effectiveness. It is also important to provide feedback to trainers and encourage them to seek out feedback from other professionals and dog owners.
BE PART OF THE SOLUTION
Donât be afraid to speak up, for what you believe is ethical, keep up with your research and education, learn from your peers and dogs you work with, and read scientific literature with a critical eye.
Share, engage and like content from force free and ethical professionals.
Do not engage in comments of professionals you donât support.
May the âForce-Freeâ be with you.
Shay Kelly - Dog Training & Behaviour
Zak George Hierarchy of Dog Needs
References:
Dunning, D., & Kruger, J. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of personality and social psychology, 77(6), 1121.
Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of personality and social psychology, 77(6), 1121-1134.
Krantz, G. (2010). The problem with aversives in dog training. Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research, 5(6), 347-349.
Pryor, K. (2002). Don't shoot the dog!: The new art of teaching and training. Bantam.