Horse Charming

Horse Charming Science-based, force free, education for horses and their people
(13)

23/03/2024

If your horse struggles with being stabled then know that this is normal for horses. It is often associated with trauma that happens with abrupt and forced weaning and then the start of "breaking". The word is "breaking" is apt.

"Individual stabling induces social isolation and confinement, and is a source of particularly stressful events for the young horse alongside the breaking-in process. These experiences can lead to behavioural disorders in individual stalls and dangerous defensive behaviours in human-horse interactions."

Have a read of this to learn more about the effects of individual stabling on young horses.

29/02/2024

I wish more people would see it as a personal failing if they can’t use food rewards without creating horses who bite instead of blaming R+ as a methodology for their incorrect application of it.

There’s such an interesting double standard where there’s always an excuse for why the behaviour of stressed horses who are traditionally trained is just a quirk, excitement or some other reason that doesn’t attribute the problem to the trainer or methods used.

Meanwhile, if you use R+, even if there’s no demonstrable evidence of your horses biting, people project this belief.

Teaching any animal to bite when using food rewards is the fault of the trainer.

If we can train dogs, who are predators and actually eat meat, to safely accept food without biting, a horse, a herbivorous flight animal, should be easier.

But instead, there’s this narrative that horses cannot be trained to accept food safely, which is ridiculous.

It is the personal failing of the person teaching the behaviour if a horse learns to bite.

If you cannot hand feed your horse without them learning to bite, it’s time to reflect on where you’re going wrong in your training and/or management and how you’re contributing to creating these behaviours.

Frankly, I find it super embarrassing to read the amount of horse people who think horses are some special exception to food rewards and too dangerous to teach to take food safely when it’s the reinforcer of choice for most zoo animals and in most industries where much more dangerous and undomesticated animals are being trained.

Don’t use food rewards if you don’t want to, but don’t project your incompetence or lack of desire to learn how to use them competently onto those who can and do want to learn.

Incorrect application always falls to the fault of the trainer and all of the people I’ve seen peddling this mindset appear to have a very poor understanding of operant conditioning as a whole and it’s a shame their narrative is such a common one in the industry.

Add ”A victim of aversive training”
10/11/2023

Add ”A victim of aversive training”

04/05/2023

Trigger Warning

Abuse and imprisonment of an innocent.

********************************

A letter from Robyn.

I'm not sure how long they have been keeping me here. It feels like the longest time.

I'm trapped, there is no way out.

The minutes feel like hours and the hours feel like days.

With nothing to do but think, every sensation in my body is magnified. There is no distraction from pain or hunger.

They come to me once a day, sometimes twice. Sometimes they treat me nicely.

Sometimes they hurt and frighten me.

I never know which it's going to be.

They say it's for my own good that they do it.

The locks are unlocked but it's not freedom that waits. I'm anxious, what's next?

I long to get out of here and be free, to move, to run to play.

They say I'm spoilt, they say I'm special.

If this is what special feels like, I'd rather just be ordinary. The ordinary me.

I don't know what I did to deserve this life.

It is not a life I would ever choose.

Such restrictions, such confinement, such loneliness.

If you were me, you wouldn't want it either. You would want to be free too.

I dream of the day when they will let me go, let me be me.

Maybe it will come, maybe it won't. Maybe this is all there is for me now.

Being kept here.

If there is anything you can do to help me get out, please try.

Please do your best. Thank you for reading this letter and for thinking of me.

Love Robyn x
(A stabled horse)

Some excellent points made here by Milestone Equestrian!
21/03/2023

Some excellent points made here by Milestone Equestrian!

The horse world sincerely needs to unpack why a huge portion of its participants have a visceral reaction to the idea of use of food rewards in training, to the point where they feel compelled to put others down for doing so entirely unprovoked, but do not maintain that same attitude at all towards harmful training in the horse world.

Far too many equestrians view it as more defensible to use harsh equipment and harsh bits as a means of maintaining control over a horse who is stressed, overwhelmed or otherwise reactive than they do to use food in training.

If we have more of an industry wide distaste towards methods of training that at their core are about making training fun and enjoyable for the horse than we do about methods of training or equipment use that are about using pain as a means of leverage to make horses more controllable for us, there is a problem.

There is no scientific literature suggesting positive reinforcement makes horses more mouthy, dangerous or dependent on treats.

There is a lot of scientific literature linking our use of certain training gadgets, bits and other high pressure methods to stress and pain responses on horses.

The fact that there is an almost unanimously less accepting attitude to the former, the use of food, than there is to methods that actually have relevant concerns in terms of the criticism being applied, is mind boggling to me.

I can’t post a video of me practicing mounting block work with my youngster using food even when he is perfectly calm, showing absolutely no signs of biting without people posting snarky comments picking apart the fact that I use food and for whatever reason, this bothers them to see even with a horse they’ll never be asked to handle

Meanwhile, it is viewed as a complete injustice for people to remark on the prevalence of pain faces in ridden horses and the normalized use of harsh equipment (twisted wire bits, leverage bits, draw reins, flashes…) that has no purpose other than to create more pressure, more leverage, more discomfort to make it easier for a human to ride their horse.

It’s viewed as wrong to do this even in generalized posts. People will get mad and attack you if you so much as suggest the fact that PERHAPS we shouldn’t have hundreds of harsh bits on the market that cannot be comfortable in the mouth even at rest, much less when pressure is applied…

This is what is wrong with the horse world.

There is a problem when people find more comfort in use of definitively harsher, more stress inducing methods than they do with the idea of giving their horse something that the horse likes in exchange for work output.

Using force and pain to get what we want is currently far more accepted than using food and it is extremely disturbing to watch, especially when criticism of said harshness is also less accepted than use of food.

I think everyone should pause for a moment and ask why that is and if that’s really how we want the horse world to be represented because I really think it reflects poorly on everyone in an industry where we claim the horse comes first until we’re blue in the face.

The horse does not come first if we are willing to cherry-pick the research we listen to and deliberately ignore the scientific validity of alternative methods whilst simultaneously ignoring any criticism of chosen methods.

The horse does not come first if the idea of providing an appetitive reward bothers us more than the idea of slapping a gag bit in their mouth.

The horse does not come first if we aren’t willing to modernize on behalf of the welfare of the horse.

At the bare minimum, the industry needs to grow up and start being more accepting of alternative methods that have proven success and ethicality, even if people choose not to use such methods.

—————————————————————————

Learning resources: http://MilestoneEquestrian.ca/resources

Webinars: https://milestoneequestrian.ca/shop-milestone

Patreon: http://Patreon.com/sdequus

Guess what? That’s our view of training horses too.
04/03/2023

Guess what? That’s our view of training horses too.

A reward-based approach is the best way to deal with behaviour issues in dogs. The American Veterinary Society of Animal Behavior recommends the use of reward-based methods for behaviour issues as well as for basic manners. In their position statement on humane dog training, they review the evidence and explain why reward-based methods are best. They say, "Reward-based learning offers the most advantages and least harm to the learner's welfare. Research supports the efficacy of reward-based training to address unwanted and challenging behaviours. There is no evidence that aversive training is necessary for dog training or behavior modification." You can download their full statement on their website:https://avsab.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/AVSAB-Humane-Dog-Training-Position-Statement-2021.pdf

This gets shared quite a lot! Sometimes people even share it without editing it to remove the credits ;-)
28/02/2023

This gets shared quite a lot! Sometimes people even share it without editing it to remove the credits ;-)

A while back I drew some sketches to illustrate the effect of systematic desensitisation and counter conditioning (mainl...
14/02/2023

A while back I drew some sketches to illustrate the effect of systematic desensitisation and counter conditioning (mainly) on the emotional responses of horses.

Imagine a pendulum swinging back and forth through states of frustration, calmness and focus and fear, depending on the horse’s living conditions and external (things in the environment) and internal factors (pain, discomfort, sleep deprivation etc.) affecting emotional state.

Before therapy, many animals show a limited ability to focus and remain calm when presented with new situations, novel stimuli or the compounding effects of several different things happening around them at once.

This is particularly true when they are taken out of what they perceive to be a safe(r) home environment in which things are familiar and changes are few.

What we see in those animals is low tolerance for frustration (when they can't get something they want or away from something they don't), and a low tolerance for other stressors such as those that might reasonably be expected to give them trouble emotionally.

It's like there's this narrow "green" zone of potential for focus but it's got (red) frustration / rage inducing distractions on one shoulder and (blue) fear / panic inducing distractions on the other. The more of each there are, the less likely our animal is going to be able to maintain any kind of focus on what they are doing or be in a calm state of mind - just like us really!

What we are aiming for by being careful with how we manage and train our horses is to expand this zone of calmness, relaxation and focus. So they have a high tolerance for what might have been previously experienced as stressors and a high tolerance for potential frustrations.

Only then can we really have any kind of meaningful dialogue and interaction with the horse if we're trying to teach them cues for repeatable behaviours, getting them to think about their posture or learning to collaborate with us on something new that we need to do for them for their care and welfare.

Too many words! Maybe my scribbles tell it better!?

A newly published study into the use of bits in horse riding has concluded that:Bitless horses had better welfare during...
31/01/2023

A newly published study into the use of bits in horse riding has concluded that:

Bitless horses had better welfare during riding compared with bitted horses

Bitless horses performed fewer hyperreactive behaviours than bitted horses

Rider safety did not differ between bitless or bitted horses

Rider satisfaction was greater for riders of bitless horses than bitted horses

Horse-rider partnerships were better for bitless horses compared with bitted horses

The full study is available here

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168159123000278?via%3Dihub

While there is no doubt in my mind that a horse will have a better experience if she is not being ridden in a bit, going bitless is not enough to produce a step-change improvement in the horse's experience of being ridden.

Whether it's a bit or a bitless bridle, if the rider is using the reins attached to that device to influence the speed, direction and posture of the horse then that involves using the bridle as a device for aversive training.

Which means that it's either the mouth or it's the nose, cheeks, poll or other parts of the face that are being pulled on to achieve that control.

Or (if you're into natural horsemanship) you may also be using a stick or flag around the head and neck of the horse to escalate if your "light rein" or postural change doesn't work.

So it's worth reading the study but it doesn't demonstrate that welfare is significantly improved by going bitless - especially if you carry on riding and interacting with the horse as you did before.

Bitless is better, but it's not enough.

Using a bit to communicate with and control the horse while riding is one of the longest standing traditions in horse riding. However, horses’ aversio…

You won’t ever see me recommending fading out the primary reinforcement (food mostly) in operant training. You can’t fad...
07/11/2022

You won’t ever see me recommending fading out the primary reinforcement (food mostly) in operant training. You can’t fade out the aversive in negative reinforcement and you can’t fade out the appetitive in positive reinforcement.

Counterconditioning, yes. You can fade out the appetitive as the perception of the animal towards a feared stimulus, event or situation changes.

Yes you can teach secondary reinforcers. Lots of them. But they only maintain their value as secondaries if their association is maintained with a primary.

The same is true for negative reinforcement. The association needs to be maintained between the threat and the aversive in the mind of the animal.

Don’t be in a hurry to fade out the primary unless you also want to see the behaviour you trained fade out with it.

When it comes to learning about horses, horse behaviour, horse keeping and training, possibly the most self-limiting rea...
24/10/2022

When it comes to learning about horses, horse behaviour, horse keeping and training, possibly the most self-limiting reaction to the output of science-based research, and the advice of professionals who use it in their work, is "Yeahbut".

Whenever a study is published, or a veterinarian, behaviourist or experienced force-free trainer shares some information, answers a question or proposes a solution to a horse health, horse keeping or behaviour question, there is usually a queue of people willing to go into "Yeahbut" mode.

"Yeahbut what if you HAVE to keep the horse in stable because your land floods in winter."

"Yeahbut what if you have to keep the horse on his own because that's the rules at your yard / barn."

"Yeahbut what if you can't control your horse without using a bit when you ride in company."

"Yeahbut what if your horse isn't food orientated or runs away if you offer her a treat."

Or "Yeah but what if everyone at your barn is making fun of you for not doing anything with your horse."

I've been reading about a conservation organisation in South Africa that is running a unique kind of reserve on the principles that attitude is the key to success.

In order to work for them you have to undergo a rigorous interview in which they probe your attitude to life and work.

One of the statements on their web page really resonated with me because it applies in all aspects of life.

It says:

We're not interested in the "I can't, because...." excuses. They're immature and get in the way. Instead, we work on the "Why not?!" principle of service and duty. We make things happen, even if it means sacrifice on our part."

If you find that your instantaneous reaction to a new idea or concept or suggestion is to look for reasons why you can't, then you will definitely find them and that's what you will focus on.

Why you can't.

Our advice is that you if you want to be awesome with animals and you want animals who love being with and doing things with you, focus your attention on what would need to be true so that you COULD do it without force. If you don't want to be awesome with animals, well..... you're in the wrong place!

The organisation involved is https://wildlifeforall.org/komsberg.html

They even have a free online course for people who want to learn more about how to develop the attitude for success.

Komsberg is a nature reserve which is over 30,000 acres and has a variety of animals and plants which are unusual and brilliantly adapted to the semi-arid conditions.

28/05/2022

People who don't like to have the practices they sell by way of horse training explained from a psychology, neuroscience or ethology perspective will sometimes try to suggest that doing something as simple as explaining how their method works to them or others who follow them is disrespectful to their ideas or way of thinking.

They will argue that there is more than one way to skin a cat or that several roads lead to Rome or that it's possible to get 9 by adding 6 and 3 as well as by adding 4 and 5.

They will argue that we should all "respect" each others ideas and opinions about how to form and reinforce or reduce behaviour in a horse.

This always smacks to me of wilful ignorance - when someone rejects information that they could read in any psychology text and shoots the messenger or encourages others to do so, and chooses to disagree with it simply because they don't like it and the implications of it for what they do to horses.

I respect science and people who rely on it and I actually think that anyone who sells services to other people to teach them how to train horses is negligent if they fail to inform themselves fully about how learning comes about, instead relying on folklore, as the basis for what they sell by way of advice to others.

Because if you don't know how animals learn then you can give a lot of advice on technique and tools and never produce the end result you want, even if you do it correctly.

Training horses is not simple arithmetic. You can get the same result by frightening or annoying a horse until he does what you want or you can teach him by setting him up to do it on his own and rewarding it.

If 9 is behaviour and all you want is some action out of a horse then 5 + 4 or 6 + 3 or 2 + 7 or 11 - 2 are all viable ways to get there. That is not in dispute.

They might all "work" for the trainer or for you to get to 9, but what about how they feel to the horse?

Numbers do not care which way we add them up to get to 9 and vehicles do not care how they are driven to get to Rome.

Horses are, for most people I want to train, not just numbers and not vehicles. And the cat does not want to be skinned anyway.

For horses, training horses is not just about getting to 9. It really matters a heck of a lot to the horse which road to Rome you choose to take.

12/11/2021

Hello. I thought I’d post this. I hope life is good wherever you are.

At Horse Charming we are now offering residential holidays where you can combine a chill-out, walking, cycling, golfing,...
09/07/2021

At Horse Charming we are now offering residential holidays where you can combine a chill-out, walking, cycling, golfing, sightseeing holiday in the south of Scotland with learning about horse keeping, horse behaviour and animal training.

You can just come for a holiday and a quick tour of our Equicentral property or invest in your learning by taking part in horse behaviour observation sessions, learn more about horse-friendly horse keeping, or dive deeper into behaviour change science as we apply it to horses.

Practical training sessions are also available and it's all completely tailorable to suit the time you want to spend on your holiday.

For available dates go to https://airbnb.com/h/stoneleacottage and let us know what you'd like to learn!

Entire home/flat in Ashkirk, SELKIRK, United Kingdom. Fresh and bright eco cottage, in a peaceful wildlife haven at the edge of a rural village. A short walk to the village pub, golf course, tranquil f...

27/06/2021
24/06/2021

Read this if your horse has the “druthers” so that you can be prepared for and protect your horse from what you might be told to do.

There are trainers who recommend using "work" to discourage horses from wanting to either head to the arena gate (which is feedback in and of itself that the horse would rather be outside the arena) or who act up when they get stressed away from their friends.

A gazillion years of evolution have produced an animal that is hard wired to need the company of others to feel safe.

So when I read about or hear of trainers who advocate using work or discomfort to associate the sought-after place or friend with unpleasantness as a cure for the "druthers" it makes me a bit sad that people will accept and adopt that strategy without thinking about what choices that offers to the horse.

For those who don't know, "the druthers" is an expression used to describe what a horse "has" when s/he'd rather be somewhere else. As in "I'd rather.... (but pronounced "I'd ruther..) .... be with my friend / in the field / at home / any place but here."

Using that expression makes people giggle, which is of course part of the marketing plan - to evoke a feel-good emotional response in the human (amusement at the distress of the animal) necessary to have people willing to be effective (willing to escalate the pressure and to do it repeatedly until there is a “result”) in doing this.

So let’s say that you have a horse in an arena that wants to be back with his friend so he keeps heading for the gate or for the part of the arena that is closest to that friend.

That means that being away from his friend is aversive to him. He doesn't like it! He's a horse - he is hard wired to be a social animal and needs the company of other horses to feel safe.

Left to his own devices he would go back to his friend.

Or let’s say that the horse keeps going to the arena gate. That tells you that the horse finds being in the arena aversive because he is seeking to leave. It’s not that he prefers being by the gate, it’s that he knows the gate is where he can get out.

It is reasonable to assume that If you left the arena gate open and dropped the reins and left the horse to his own devices he would walk right out of the arena and go somewhere else.

So let's work through what would happen if when he heads to be near his friend or to the gate he experiences some discomfort from his rider and is either corrected and made to go away from that place again or is made to "work" in that place.

So now you have a horse that finds himself experiencing two aversive situations.

When he is away from his friend (or in the arena) he finds it aversive, and now, when he goes near his friend or to the gate, wishing to leave, he finds it aversive there too. He is made to work and trot around and he is only given rest or comfort away from the gate or away from his friend. In fact he begins to find it more aversive being near his friend or the gate than being elsewhere.

Does the horse:

a) Start to choose to keep a distance from his friend / the gate because it is the least aversive place to be of the two?

b) Start to choose distance from his friend because although mother nature told him he'd find peace and comfort and feel safe near his friend he was wrong and actually he can now find peace and comfort away from his friend after all. Or start to choose distance from the gate because he magically now loves being anywhere else but the gate?

Perhaps now he will want to stay away from his friend all the time because it's so much more peaceful there.

And then this horse spoke to the human and said:

"Thank you oh glorious wise kind human who showed me how to choose to be with you, and go where you decide I should go, because in spite of a gazillion years of evolution - yours and mine - you still think that giving me, the horse, a choice between a rock and a hard place is a smart thing to do, and I could not agree more!"

And then they rode off together into the sunset with the fairies dancing after them.

This is fantasy horsemanship at its finest.

The answer? Is to make the arena the place where good stuff happens so the horse looks forward to being in there. And to bring his friend along too, or occupy his friend with a haynet or treat ball right outside so they aren’t too far apart while we work on gradually increasing the distance between the two …… while making good stuff happen.

To me, natural horsemanship should involve working WITH the nature of the horse, not trying to override, punish or suppress it.

Horses naturally want to be with others in preference to being with humans. And that’s ok by me. I don’t see any value in kidding myself that they will ever think I am a good substitute for another horse. Especially if that involves making their life difficult if they do the “wrong” thing. If you really love them, love them for what and who they are and do as much as you can to enable their natural needs. To feel safe with you they need to be having a good time with you all the time. Not a bad time until they “behave”.

Keep it natural!

31/05/2021

If you don't know how aversive stimulation works to positively punish or negatively reinforce behaviour, you could be persuaded by someone who you think knows more about horses than you do, to cause a horse that tends to want to run about to "move its feet" on the basis that this will cause it to want to move them less.

This has a tendency to backfire.

If you ask the horse to move its feet more, when it is moving them a little bit, you could well be positively punishing slower movement of the feet. Which will mean it will happen less in future in the same situation.

And you also risk the behaviour of running about more being negatively reinforced when you stop or reduce the aversive stimulation you used to get the horse to move its feet more.

Which means the horse will move them more in your presence in that context, not less.

We cannot know what has been reinforced or punished until we see what happens next time because these consequences build history that determines future patterns of behaviour.

I have seen several horses (that would be described as "needing to move their feet" and whose handlers have followed advice to move their feet more when they start to move), continue to live up to this description. Even when that strategy has been correctly applied by the expert.

They keep doing it, they get labelled for it and in fact they do it more, particularly in contexts where their apparent need to move their feet has been "encouraged" in an effort to make them move more than they want to, to slow them down.

If you want the horse to learn to slow the feet down then what you have to do is start with their mind and emotions. Start in a place where they are calm and relaxed and standing still and mark and positively reinforce that. That gives them a compelling reason to stand still and relaxed and some history of doing so.

Just catch them being calm and relaxed and still and mark and reinforce that.

Then teach them to stand calm and relaxed next to a target and take it with you or improvise one in the place you want the horse calm and relaxed.

Then go and practice that in different places. Once they know a marker signal and what it means you can mark times when they are still and relaxed. And then they will do that more. Then you can get relaxation on cue, fade out the target, and get it as the default. Voila: calm and relaxed horse that doesn't keep running about to avoid being made to run about.

That which is reinforced happens more. That which is punished happens less. Not because of what we do, but because of what the horse perceives to be the consequences his behaviour. The horse decides.

Even a few seconds of positively reinforcing calmness, relaxation and standing still or moving slowly at a time will build to minutes in no time.

The horse will begin to volunteer to stand still and be calm and relaxed.

It is very unwise to apply a recommended strategy for changing behaviour without knowing how horses learn and what could happen if you apply someone's recommended approach. It can backfire even if you apply it perfectly.

They might well be saying "let me help you!" and wind up not helping anyone at all.

Because the horse decides what got punished or reinforced, not us.

And the horse that decides that its slower movement got positively punished and its running around got negatively reinforced will do it more and sooner to avoid the aversive stimulation.

The horse decides.

12/03/2021

The science behind the technique known as Approach and Retreat.

Approach and retreat is the term often used to describe a process for changing the response of an animal to a feared or potentially feared stimulus.

There is no scientifically agreed definition because it isn't a scientific "thing". It's a protocol or procedure that applies a form of behaviour modification known as negative reinforcement - where the animal is approached or approaches a feared thing or situation, and the removal (the retreat) of the feared or disliked thing happens when the animal shows a desired response.

So approach and retreat is an invented term used to describe the process of exposing an animal to a feared stimulus and then removing that stimulus when the animal does something the trainer wants. That could be lowering their head, looking at the trainer, moving towards the stimulus, pointing an ear towards the trainer, slowing their flight response or ceasing to flee, breathing out - whatever the trainer deems is a desirable response.

In most cases of the use of approach and retreat, the removal of the stimulus (or the removal of the animal from it) is contingent on the animal appearing to become calmer - for instance ceasing to try to escape or flee.

However this slowing or apparent signs of calming in the behaviour of the animal is not always - and shouldn't be assumed to be - any indication that the animal no longer fears the stimulus.

They may be learning that their behaviour makes "it" go away or stop, but the important thing to think about is this:

If the animal is choosing to consciously use their behaviour to cause something to go away or stop, then that's actually evidence that they still fear it to some extent and they want distance from it.

The other issue is that when animals have a milder fear of something they will often instinctively slow down their movement, lower their head and avert their gaze, sometimes turn their head away, so as not to antagonise a perceived predator or threat.

This is known as appeasement behaviour - it means "I feel threatened, but I am trying to show I am no threat by slowing down my movements, not making eye contact and keeping my head down" literally and figuratively.

They also do this towards innanimate threats.

So some of the changes in behaviour that we see in response to the approach of a perceived threat are not because the animal is becoming calmer, and more accepting or trusting, but because they are trying to calm themselves, and appease the threat.

The final risk of using the movement towards an animal of a feared stimulus and it's removal (negative reinforcement) for a desired response is that animal ceasing to run away could be the onset of something that in science is called learned helplessness. It's sometimes referred to as an animal becoming "shut down" and it's often seen in horses that have been subjected to a lot of aversive training like this.
It's what happens when the animal gives up trying to get away because trying to get away makes things no better and often makes them worse for himself.

For instance if a horse is wearing a rope halter and lead rope and when he tries to run away he feels pain from the knots on the halter or the rope around his poll then that's making the situation worse. So he may stop trying to run away because it hurts more to do so than he fears the threat.

Although I should add that it's important to know that adrenalin is a pain killer - so a highly stressed horse will tolerate more pressure from a device like a rope halter or chifney or a normal bit than he would when he is calm.

Aside from the misunderstandings of why approach and retreat doesn't necessarily change perception of feared stimuli (and changing behaviour is not the same as changing feelings by any means), approach and retreat may never work for an animal that has learned to be afraid of something and has been successful in escaping or avoiding it.

That's another huge risk of using approach and retreat. Instead of the animal learning that stopping his flight response makes the feared thing go away or stop, what he may learn is that if he fights harder or tries harder to flee, or accidentally does something that momentarily makes it stop, his brain will lay down a neural pathway to repeat that behaviour. This is how horses become chronic rearers, buckers, fence jumpers, shy in traffic, bolt, or run out at show jumps.

Learned escape and avoidance behaviour is conditioned behaviour.

A much better strategy for introducing novel stimuli to animals of any kind is to use graduated passive habituation techniques, or to use proactive interventions like systematic desensitisation.

But with stimuli the animal has learned to fear (something bad happened when they encountered that stimulus and fleeing or fighting made it stop - even momentarily) it may require a long term strategy to counter-condition the feared stimulus by persistently associating very small versions of the frightening thing with other things that they really like.

Animals form learned fear associations with things, when something with no initial significance to them, or something perceived to be a mild threat is associated with something of aversive or more aversive value.

Their perception can be changed by counter conditioning, which helps them to change their feelings, by reassociating something that was scary with something that has powerful appetitive value.

This is not the same as using consequences to modify behaviour.

It is not the same as giving the animal a treat if they behave.
It is about modifying the perception an animal has of something by associating it with something they like.

If you have an animal who has learned to fear a thing or a situation we have procedures we can teach you to help change their perception of that thing. Approach and retreat is not one of those.

What we'd like to do even more is to teach you how to use non aversive techniques before you get to the situation where your animal has learned to fear something :-)

If you're interested in using proven and force-free ways of training your animals, please do get in touch.

Address

We Coach People Globally By Video. Distance No Object
Selkirk
TD74

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Horse Charming posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to Horse Charming:

Share

Category