22/01/2025
We have until February 7th to register our opposition to the planning permission to demolish the Bicknacre pet shop and replace with a supermarket that nobody wants.
Wonderful contact magazine article has been turned into a proforma below to make it easy for you. Link is to the planning permission you just need to register your opposition. Also got John whittingdale's email address below if you want to send it to him.
https://publicaccess.chelmsford.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?keyVal=SOSTUYBRITP00&activeTab=summary&fbclid=IwY2xjawH83_hleHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHSf_d6Ar5PXHiwGP4NULgW6a59FRF4_WEEnBOcOWiIb3Posl9vMN_mU7yw_aem_3Ci5wZ_5qvJMwVxrpT5f3w
[email protected]
I am writing to formally object to the planning application for the proposed retail outlet development on the site of Priory Pet and Country Stores, Bicknacre. This proposal raises significant concerns that could adversely impact the character, safety, and well-being of the village and its residents.
1. Traffic and Safety Hazards The proposed site is located on Maldon Road, which is already heavily congested, particularly due to increased traffic from developments in nearby areas. Introducing a busy retail outlet between two mini-roundabouts will exacerbate traffic issues, creating a hazardous environment for drivers and pedestrians. The proximity to Jesters Kids Club and Nursery raises additional safety concerns, as children and parents frequently access this area.
2. Loss of Local Business and Character The demolition of Priory Pet and Country Stores would result in the loss of a beloved local business that serves the community. Furthermore, replacing it with a multinational retail chain would erode the village's unique character and undermine existing independent retailers, including Priory Village Stores and James Fruit & Veg.
3. Questionable Need for the Development Bicknacre is already well-served by supermarkets and convenience stores in nearby towns, as well as local shops within walking distance. There is no demonstrated need for another retail outlet. The argument that it will reduce car movements is unconvincing, as the development would likely attract more vehicles to the area, not fewer.
4. Impact on Existing Infrastructure The proposed site is unsuitable for a high-traffic retail outlet due to its location in a cul-de-sac and its reliance on limited infrastructure. The potential addition of measures like zebra crossings or expanded parking would further disrupt the area and negatively impact residents.
This proposal poses significant risks to the safety, sustainability, and character of Bicknacre. I urge the council to reject this application and instead prioritize developments that genuinely enhance the quality of life for residents without compromising safety, local businesses, or the village’s identity.
Thank you for considering this objection.
Yours sincerely,