20/11/2025
🔆MY LETTER TO OUR MP🔆 make sure you write to yours
Strong Objection to Section 2 Fi****ms Reclassification and Its Damaging Impact on Rural Communities.
Dear Iqbal Mohamed,
I am writing to express my strong and unequivocal opposition to the proposal to move Section 2 shotguns into Section 1 licensing. This policy is not only misguided—it is dangerously out of touch with the reality of rural life and the actual sources of gun crime in the UK.
Let me be clear: legally certified shotgun owners are not the problem. We already undergo some of the toughest vetting procedures in the world. Section 2 shotguns are held by responsible people who follow the law, invest in safe storage, and comply fully with licensing requirements. There is no evidence that tightening restrictions on an already regulated and compliant group will reduce crime.
Criminals do not apply for shotgun certificates. They obtain weapons through illegal networks, smuggling routes, or black-market channels that have nothing to do with lawful owners. These proposals would do absolutely nothing to stem the flow of guns coming in “through the back door.” All they will achieve is punishing the people who are already following the rules.
What concerns me even more is the wider economic damage this policy would inflict—damage that rural communities simply cannot withstand. Our rural economies rely heavily on shooting estates and sporting activity. These estates support conservation work, tourism, hospitality, trade, accommodation services, guides, caterers, equipment suppliers, and countless other small businesses that depend on shooting seasons to survive.
The government’s current and proposed tax changes are already placing massive pressure on rural businesses—many of which operate on tight margins as it is. Increased operational costs, reduced reliefs, and tightening financial conditions are pushing countryside enterprises to their limit. Introducing further restrictions on shooting—one of the key pillars supporting rural economies—would be the final blow for many small businesses.
Hotels, pubs, local shops, transport services, and seasonal workers rely on the income brought by shooting activities. If these proposals go ahead, many of these businesses simply will not survive. It is no exaggeration to say that this combination of new taxes and unnecessary firearm restrictions could finish off a significant portion of rural enterprise altogether.
The government claims to be committed to supporting growth and protecting British industries, yet this policy does the opposite. It harms lawful citizens, destroys vital rural economies, and leaves the real problem—illegal firearms—completely untouched.
I urge you to oppose this proposal and raise these concerns in Parliament. Rural communities deserve policies that support them, not measures that threaten their livelihoods. I would appreciate hearing your position on this issue and any steps you intend to take.
Yours sincerely,