13/09/2021
🔺 LABELS 🔺
Labels are useful because they simplify communication and aid understanding, but this can only be achieved if everyone has a common understanding of what the labels mean and what they entail.
When it comes to labels about contentious topics such as training methods, I personally think there is more harm than good because people already have preconceived (and often, warped) notions about these labels before joining the conversation (if they are even remotely interested to actually have a conversation about it), which is really the point at which the conversation breaks down.
Labels are extremely powerful, and can be dangerous if those in power are given free reign to place these labels. Think ecollar vs shock collar, prong collar vs pinch collar, slip collar vs choke collar. Notice the negative connotations of all the alternative names for these tools? Even more worrying is throwing these tools into a blanket category and calling it "aversive" (again, negative connotation).
Do I use tools?
✔️ A whole variety! I use my voice (!!), hand signs, harnesses, slip leads, flat collars, martingale collars, clickers, chain leashes, biothane leashes, rope leashes, etc
Do I use the same tools for every dog?
❌ No way! I wouldn't use a slip lead for a dog who suffered at the hands of someone who choked him continuously, the same way that I wouldn't speak loudly to a dog who is easily frightened.
Do I use treats/food?
✔️ Of course I do because it's an amazing primary reinforcer!
Do I use treats/food for every dog?
❌ I can't if the dog is overstimulated and ignores the food entirely. But this doesn't mean I don't reward the dog in other ways like play, verbal praise and physical affection!
In short, I would simply err on the side of caution when encountering any purist/extremist/emotive thinking.
Are there any labels that you think should be changed? Let me know in the comments below or drop me a DM!
