09/12/2022
Balance and Proportions
"In forming a judgement on any specimen of a breed, the general appearance, which is the first impression the dog makes on the eye, should be first considered. Secondly should be noticed its size, shape and make, or rather its proportions in the relation they bear to each other.
No point should be so much in excess of the others as to destroy the general symmetry, make or make the dog appear deformed, interfere with its powers of motion, etc.
Style, carriage, gait, temper and its several points should be considered separately in detail, due allowance being made for the bitch, which is not so grand nor as well developed as the dog". (KC British Bulldog)
"The correct specimen exhibits balance whether standing or in motion. Each part flows and fits smoothly into its neighbouring parts without calling attention to itself". (AKC Irish Setter)
Both these quoted parts of the breed standard present a word picture of a dog that is a complete whole.
Overall proportions produce distinctive silhouettes, and dogs will differ in proportions within their respective breeds due to the depth of the body and length of the leg. The correct body length and height at wither are vital to each breed's general balance and outline.
Recognising the correct length of the leg and depth and length of the body for each breed is an essential requirement for not only judging dogs but also assessing the correct breed type in your own dogs. It would be best to consider the breed's balance, purpose and movement.
However, there is balance, and there is balance. A dog that is incorrectly angulated both front and rear can be balanced. So, knowing the breed's purpose goes a long way to determining whether this dog is correctly balanced for the breed.
You also need to understand why it is built the way it is and have a picture in your mind of the ideal in the breed, keeping in mind how and why it moves the way it does.
Looking at proportions, some breed standards spell out exactly how long the body should be. However, body measurement terminology in breed standards needs to be more consistent.
We start with a rectangle, which is longer than high. There are two measurements under this category. Longer than high from the point of forechest to the point of buttock and longer than high from the point of shoulder to the point of buttock, with the latter being longer by nearly 2.5cm or 1 inch.
Then we have a square. The body length measured from the point of forechest to the point of buttocks is the same as measured from withers to ground.
Approximately square. Usually measured from the point of shoulder in a straight line to the buttock. So, slightly longer than high.
We have a "Square from withers in a straight line to the buttock". This means this breed is longer than high as there is a need for a forequarter in front of the wither!
Or the breed standards that indicate moderately long, moderately short, of sufficient length, somewhat long, long and low and all the other variables in the wording of the standards. Such as the vertically challenged breeds of Dachshund, Welsh Corgi Cardigan, Skye Terrier etc.
Train your eye to see balance, as it is a crucial part of correctly evaluating the dog.
Can you describe your breed's length-to-height ratio, even if it does not state it in the breed standard?