02/15/2024
Yesterday I posted a reel talking about how much I dislike the way dog trainers are so comfortable to badmouth their clients on here.
But the truth is, the problem isn’t that the trainers are badmouthing clients, the problem is that their community makes them feel like they CAN.
So, here are things I look for when interacting with others in the dog training community online:
Are the posts meant to uplift the dog owners that follow them or demean the ones that don’t?
(Is it joking with your own community, or laughing at someone else’s?)
Are the posts focused on what they advise clients TO do, or what they advise them NOT to do?
(You know, the trainers who swear they want nothing to do with XYZ-group, but also won’t stop talking about them.)
Are they criticizing another trainer or ideology WITH alternatives, or are they just leaving it at the criticism?
(Is there a “this is how I train XYZ” post for every “stop using this tool” post?)
Are negative posts written from the perspective of education and honesty, or fear-mongering and clickbait?
(Take a shot every time you see the buzzwords “fear,” “force,” “pain,”?)
And when most content falls into the latter category, it makes me question where their passion really lies.
So over the past year, I’ve been personally trying to restructure the tone of my posts.
Instead of “5 mistakes you’re making with your dog,” I might write, “5 things to try with your dog.” Instead of, “How you’re hurting your dog’s confidence,” I might write, “How you can help your dog’s confidence.” Instead of, “You aren’t playing with your dog enough,” I might write, “How to play with your dog more.”
It’s less optimal for the algorithm (so don’t judge me too hard if I slip one in every once in a while…), but it’s more optimal for the kind of community I want to have here!