Roman's Holistic Dog Training

Roman's Holistic Dog Training Helping guardians reach their dog's full potential by teaching them holistic philosophy of dog parent I approach dog behavior from a systemic perspective.
(1)

Since 2007 my vision is that dog owners should know how to teach their dogs the basic social skills. My Holistic dog training approach implements Trauma-Informed , Secure Attachment, Force three approach, Instead of the common “alpha theory” (based on fear and submission), or balanced training (punishment for mistakes and reward for complicated)I create trusted, secure attachment relationships tha

t foster human leadership and reach your dog’s potential. We look at the whole system and environment to understand triggers and create success that lasts. I coach people too, to understand the natural needs and responses of his/her dog. I will point out characteristics specific to each breed or breed-mix and work with their natural skills and tendencies. Dog guardians learn to heal behaviors and reinforce the good ones with clear communication, love, empathy and trust. My methods work quickly and effectively. Most clients see first results after one session. NOTE:
While all post are educational, I might share links to recommended items. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. You will recognize them from “(paid link)”, “ ” or “ ”.

Position Statement on Michael Vick’s Appointment as Head Coach of Norfolk State UniversityAs a strong advocate for anima...
12/21/2024

Position Statement on Michael Vick’s Appointment as Head Coach of Norfolk State University

As a strong advocate for animal welfare and ethical leadership, I acknowledge that Michael Vick has taken steps since his release from prison to support animal welfare causes. His efforts, such as advocating for legislation to protect pets in hot cars and speaking out against dogfighting through The Humane Society’s campaigns, are commendable and demonstrate a degree of personal growth.

However, the gravity of his past actions—actively funding, participating in, and perpetuating the torture and killing of dogs—cannot be ignored, even amidst these efforts. Redemption is a journey, and while Vick has made strides, his appointment as a head coach at Norfolk State University, a position of significant influence, raises serious ethical concerns.

Acknowledging Growth While Upholding Standards

Michael Vick’s public advocacy for animal welfare and his willingness to address his past wrongdoings deserve acknowledgment. By working with organizations like The Humane Society and supporting legislation that protects animals, he has contributed to meaningful change. His ability to reach communities that may be resistant to traditional advocacy is a unique and valuable asset.

However, leadership in education, particularly at an HBCU like Norfolk State, requires more than professional achievements and a public-facing commitment to change. It demands a clear and sustained demonstration of integrity, accountability, and alignment with the institution’s values. While Vick’s efforts post-conviction are notable, they do not fully erase the harm caused by his actions or mitigate the message that his appointment sends to the community.

Balancing Opportunity with Responsibility

Norfolk State’s decision to hire Michael Vick represents an opportunity for the university to challenge him to deepen his advocacy for ethical treatment of animals and to demonstrate, in a leadership role, his commitment to redemption. If this appointment is to move forward, the university should:
1. Establish Animal Welfare Initiatives: Collaborate with Vick to develop and fund programs that educate the community about the importance of humane treatment of animals.
2. Require Transparency and Accountability: Publicly outline how Vick will continue his advocacy and make this a core part of his coaching responsibilities.
3. Ensure Community Dialogue: Provide a platform for open conversations about redemption, accountability, and the lessons his past can teach future generations.

A Call for Ethical Leadership

Michael Vick’s story can serve as a powerful example of the potential for change, but it is critical that his actions continue to reflect an ongoing commitment to the principles of compassion and accountability. Norfolk State’s decision to place him in a position of mentorship and influence must come with clear expectations for ethical leadership.

While I remain deeply disappointed by the appointment given his history, I hope this role will serve as an opportunity for Norfolk State and Michael Vick to demonstrate that redemption and accountability can coexist in a meaningful and impactful way.

Sincerely,
Roman
Holistic Trauma-Informed Dog Behavior Consultant

Resource Guarding  Imagine this: You’re dining at a restaurant, and just as you’re enjoying your meal, the waiter swoops...
12/13/2024

Resource Guarding

Imagine this: You’re dining at a restaurant, and just as you’re enjoying your meal, the waiter swoops in and takes your plate away before you’re finished. How would you feel the next time that same waiter approaches your table? Probably tense, guarded, and wary. 😱

Now, think about this in the context of your dog. Resource guarding is a natural, instinctual behavior. It’s your dog’s way of saying, “This is important to me.” The key is not to punish or confront this behavior, but to reframe how your dog sees you in these situations.

Instead of being someone who takes away valued resources, why not become someone who adds value? Every time you approach, let your dog learn to expect good things—like a tastier treat, a fun toy, or affection. You can either teach your dog that your presence brings loss or that it brings abundance.🥰

So, ask yourself: in your dog’s mind, are you a giver or a taker? Choose to be the giver, and watch your dog’s trust and confidence in you grow.
Want to be proactive or struggling with your dog’s resource guarding?
Comment below.

12/13/2024

With sadness, I see dog training research heading back to the dark ages.

12/13/2024

New study suggest dogs on harness pull harder...duh...they don't hurt like Starmark and prong collars!

12/03/2024

Yep, I’m coming to you raw, real, and in my bathrobe—because sometimes the best conversations happen when you’re comfy. Let’s talk resource guarding: that totally normal (but frustrating) behavior where your dog gives you the look over a food bowl or toy.

Here’s the thing: we expect dogs to chill and share, but let’s be honest—most humans aren’t great at that either (looking at you, last slice of pizza people).

We’re diving into:

What resource guarding really is and why it’s NOT your dog being “bad.”
How to approach it without making your dog—or yourself—feel like a failure.
Simple, humane ways to help your dog feel safe, understood, and less “mine, mine, mine!”
This isn’t about fixing your dog; it’s about helping both of you build trust and connection. Let’s break down the emotions behind the behavior and figure out what works for your dog (and maybe toss in a few laughs along the way).

Bring your Tea or coffee, your questions, and let’s have some real talk—bathrobe optional.

If you need guidance, I’m here to help. Let’s work together to create a safe and trusting environment for your dog. Book a call: https://holisticdogtraining.as.me/Behavior911

11/22/2024

Dogs are not defined by their behavior!
Do you need help understand their behavior?

Send a message to learn more

The Childish Comparison of Balanced Training to Force-Free TrainingLet’s get real: comparing balanced training to a forc...
10/31/2024

The Childish Comparison of Balanced Training to Force-Free Training

Let’s get real: comparing balanced training to a force-free approach is like comparing a hammer to a key. Balanced training forces behaviors into compliance with corrections and punishment when “needed.” In contrast, force-free training gently unlocks solutions, focusing on patience, understanding, and getting to the root of behavior challenges. It’s not about simply stopping a dog from barking or lunging; it’s about understanding why they’re barking or feeling stressed in the first place.

Force-free training considers the whole dog—their past experiences, emotional needs, and natural behaviors. Rather than treating dogs as machines that need to be “fixed,” it sees them as sentient beings, each with their unique histories and feelings. By building trust and addressing the true causes of behavior, force-free training helps dogs feel safe and understood, creating lasting and humane solutions.

✨ Ready to unlock a compassionate path to behavior change? ✨

As a trauma-informed, holistic dog behavior consultant, I’m here to guide you in understanding and supporting your dog’s true needs. Together, we’ll create a personalized, force-free approach that builds trust, strengthens your bond, and addresses behaviors at their root—no hammers, just the right keys.

🔗 Book an exploratory video call with me and start your journey toward a deeper, more connected life with your dog!
https://holisticdogtraining.as.me/Short-Web

10/27/2024

Using emojis tell your professional Bio. I go first:
🌉🐾🤝👩‍🏫➡️💡❤️🐕
answer in the comments

Let’s cut through the noise here. The debate around shock collars, choke collars, and prong collars shouldn’t be about w...
10/24/2024

Let’s cut through the noise here. The debate around shock collars, choke collars, and prong collars shouldn’t be about whether they work or not—it’s about whether they should even be in the conversation when we talk about training sentient beings. If we were discussing training apes, would we be sitting here debating the ethics of shock collars? I doubt it. Yet, when it comes to dogs—creatures we’ve labeled as family, emotionally intelligent, and deeply connected to humans—we’re still stuck in this tired loop of arguing whether these tools are ethical or harmful.

Here’s the real problem: we’re not addressing why these tools are even needed in the first place. What’s driving people to use them? If we want to solve this, we have to start digging deeper.

Why Are Aversive Tools Still Used?

1. Misunderstanding Canine Behavior: Many people simply don’t get what their dog’s behavior is trying to communicate. What looks like defiance or stubbornness is often fear, anxiety, or confusion. Instead of figuring out why the dog is acting out, they reach for a shock collar as a quick fix.
2. Ignoring Emotional and Psychological Issues: Dogs experience emotional trauma just like humans do. Whether it’s anxiety, fear-based aggression, or stress, these are not issues that can be fixed by suppressing the behavior with pain. Aversive tools only mask the real problem instead of resolving it.
3. Medical and Genetic Factors Get Overlooked: Sometimes the behavior is rooted in pain, medical issues, or genetics. Without looking at these factors first, people jump to aversive tools, which only adds more stress to a dog already suffering from something physical.
4. Lack of Knowledge About Alternatives: Many dog owners and even some trainers don’t know there are humane alternatives that work better. Aversive tools get pushed because people haven’t been taught there’s a better way.
5. The Quick Fix Mentality: Let’s face it—people want immediate results. Aversive tools give them quick compliance, but what they don’t realize is they’re only suppressing behavior, not solving the root issue. It’s the difference between masking the problem and actually curing it.

Deflecting from the Real Science

The author focuses on poking holes in a few studies, as if that disproves the whole body of research showing the psychological and physical damage these tools cause. Sure, no study is perfect, but we’ve reached a point where the scientific consensus is clear: tools like shock collars cause stress, fear, and even long-term emotional damage. It’s like back when people were arguing about smoking being “not that bad” because they found flaws in early studies. At some point, you have to accept the bigger picture.

The ‘Harm’ Argument Is a Red Herring

The claim that the definition of “harm” is too broad and could apply to anything? That’s a classic deflection. Let’s not pretend the word “harm” is some vague, hard-to-define concept. When we’re talking about tools like shock, prong, and choke collars, the intent is clear: these tools are designed to cause discomfort or pain to get compliance. That’s not a broad definition—that’s literally their purpose. They work by triggering fear, pain, or discomfort to suppress behavior.

By claiming that the definition of harm is too broad, people are trying to minimize the very real, very specific ways these tools cause distress. We’re not talking about banning everything; we’re talking about banning tools that, when used exactly as intended, cause harm. The harm isn’t just physical—it’s emotional and psychological, too. It’s not a broad idea, it’s a real, measurable problem with a clear solution: stop using tools that cause intentional harm.

False Equivalence to Other Industries

The author brings up the pharmaceutical industry as if there’s some parallel to dog training tools. But come on, regulating a drug that goes through years of testing isn’t the same as saying shock collars should be allowed because, well, ‘science is complicated.’ The reality is, we’re talking about sentient beings here, not products. Dogs aren’t lab experiments, and treating their welfare like it’s just another regulation debate misses the entire point. If we’ve moved past using harmful tools in other areas, why are we stuck defending them for dogs?

The Bias Smokescreen

The author spends a lot of time talking about personal bias and being accused of it. That’s just noise. The more you focus on defending your objectivity, the less you’re addressing the real issue: whether these tools should be used on dogs. The post positions itself as “neutral” but is loaded with defensive language, which makes the claim of objectivity feel shaky. The focus should be on the dogs, not on defending one’s stance.

Resistance to Ethical Evolution

The idea that these tools will naturally phase out as “better methods” emerge is outdated. Ethical evolution doesn’t happen in a vacuum. It happens because people—and yes, sometimes regulations—push for change. If we waited for cruel methods to fade away on their own, we’d still be using all kinds of inhumane practices, on both humans and animals. Shock, choke, and prong collars represent a time when we didn’t know better. But we do know better now. These tools don’t belong in the future of dog training.

Would We Have This Conversation About Apes?

Here’s the kicker. We’re having this endless debate over whether shock collars and choke collars are okay for dogs, but if we were talking about training apes, would this even be a conversation? No one would even think about using a shock collar on a chimpanzee because we understand that these creatures have complex emotional and cognitive lives. But somehow, when it’s a dog—a being we claim is part of our family—we think it’s still up for debate? The real problem here is that we’re stuck in this cognitive dissonance where we celebrate dogs as emotionally intelligent beings and yet treat them like gadgets to be controlled with pain.

The Takeaway

The argument over aversive tools like shock collars, prong collars, and choke collars isn’t about their effectiveness; it’s about their ethics. Just because something works doesn’t mean we should use it. We’re not in the 1980s anymore—there are better, humane ways to train dogs that don’t rely on causing pain or fear. It’s time we acknowledge that dogs, like apes or dolphins, deserve more respect than to be subjected to tools of control.

5 Real Solutions to Replace Aversive Tools
- it works for many holistic professionals-
Mutts & Mischief Holistic Dog Education and Behaviour Services, Marco Adda, Gabriel Casanova Miralda Neil Rubenstein, Steve Kalko( message me if you want to be on this list)

Now that we’ve talked about why these tools are still around, let’s look at how we can replace them with real solutions- sorry, they don’t look dramatic on social media. 🤷‍♂️

1. Get a Full Behavioral Assessment: Before reaching for any tool, take the time to assess the dog’s full situation—emotionally, behaviorally, and environmentally. What’s causing the problem? What’s the dog communicating? Often, the behavior is just a symptom, not the core issue.
2. Look for Medical or Genetic Causes: Before you assume it’s just “bad behavior,” get your dog checked by a vet. Pain, illness, or genetic factors may be driving the behavior. If there’s an underlying medical problem, no amount of training or tools is going to fix that.
3. Focus on Emotional and Relational Healing: Building trust and emotional security with your dog is key. Positive reinforcement, emotional healing, and trauma-informed approaches do way more for long-term behavior change than any aversive tool. It’s about the relationship, not control.
4. Educate Dog Parents and Trainers: The real solution starts with education. We need to arm dog parents and trainers with the knowledge and tools to handle behavioral issues humanely. Workshops, online courses, and one-on-one support can go a long way in showing people they don’t need to rely on fear or pain.
5. Commit to the Long Game: Humane training methods aren’t quick fixes, but they’re permanent ones. Invest in your dog’s emotional well-being, use positive reinforcement, and create a safe environment. The time it takes to get it right will pay off with real, lasting change.

It’s simple: If we truly see dogs as sentient beings—and we say we do—then tools that are inherently designed to cause harm shouldn’t even be on the table. Full stop.

Let’s move beyond this outdated debate and start focusing on methods that respect dogs’ intelligence, emotional capacity, and individuality. We owe them that.

I encourage trainers to constantly self-reflect, educate themselves, and evolve in their methods while maintaining trans...
10/24/2024

I encourage trainers to constantly self-reflect, educate themselves, and evolve in their methods while maintaining transparency with dog owners.

10/23/2024

Thank you so much to everyone who voted for Mutts & Mischief Holistic Dog Education and Behaviour Services and I, and of course thank you to our wonderful students and teacher for giving us your time and the amazing session we had!

And thank you so much to the The Pet Professional Guild team for creating and organising these events, giving so much of your time and dedication to the welfare of animals internationally! 🐾
Check the attached link to see all winners https://www.petprofessionalguild.com/pet-owners/pets-and-their-people/pets-and-their-people-blog/celebrating-life-together-the-votes-are-in/

Should We Let Them Fight It Out?Alright, let’s get one thing straight: letting your dogs “fight it out” is like signing ...
10/03/2024

Should We Let Them Fight It Out?

Alright, let’s get one thing straight: letting your dogs “fight it out” is like signing off on a cage match in your own living room. It’s not just a bad idea—it’s reckless. Imagine approving domestic violence because you think it’ll somehow resolve the conflict. Wouldn’t happen, right? Well, the same goes for your dogs. They don’t “figure it out” through fighting—they get hurt, traumatized, and potentially dangerous.

Understanding Why Dogs Fight: There’s Always a Root Cause
No dog just wakes up one morning and decides to throw down for the fun of it. There’s always something driving those fights. It could be:

Undiagnosed Medical Issues: Pain can turn even the sweetest dog into a grouch. If a dog’s snapping more than usual, it might be time to rule out health problems like arthritis or gastrointestinal discomfort.

Separation Anxiety: A dog struggling with being alone can develop serious emotional stress, which can spill over into reactivity or aggression towards other dogs in the home.

Night Terrors: Yes, dogs can experience nightmares too—especially those with a history of trauma. If a dog wakes up on the wrong side of a bad dream, their behavior might be unpredictable.

Early Puppyhood Trauma: Experiences during the first few weeks of life matter a lot. Lack of proper socialization or exposure to stressful situations can make a dog more prone to aggressive behaviors later on.

Letting them fight to see “who’s boss” isn’t addressing any of these issues—it’s just ignoring them. And the results? Broken trust, heightened anxiety, and often, a deepening of the behavioral issues that started the fight in the first place.

Don’t Just Manage the Fight—Get to the Root
Instead of watching your dogs go at it and hoping it’ll somehow sort itself out, why not address the real problem? Whether it’s working through trauma, learning to read body language, or creating a safer environment, it’s all about setting your dogs up for success, not failure.

If you’re dealing with dogs that can’t seem to get along, I can help. As a holistic behavior consultant with a trauma-informed, relational approach, I’ve worked with countless families to resolve these kinds of issues in a humane, effective way. No drama, no bloodshed—just positive, long-term solutions.

I won’t overwhelm you with jargon or one-size-fits-all advice. Instead, I’ll work with you to figure out exactly what’s triggering the behavior and create a plan that keeps everyone safe while we work through it. Think of it as conflict mediation, but for dogs—and I’m the guy that steps in to make sure peace is restored.

How I Can Help You and Your Dogs
Here’s what I can offer if you’re ready to ditch the fight mentality and embrace a compassionate approach:

Behavioral Assessments: Let’s pinpoint exactly what’s driving your dogs’ aggression. Is it a medical issue? A resource-guarding problem? Fear? We’ll figure it out together.

Customized Behavior Plans: No cookie-cutter solutions here. Every dog is different, so every plan is unique—tailored to meet your dogs’ needs and your lifestyle.

Virtual and In-Person Support: Whether it’s through virtual consultations or in-person sessions (depending on your location), I’m here to support you every step of the way.

Ongoing Guidance and Support: Behavioral change doesn’t happen overnight. I’ll provide continuous support, check-ins, and adjustments as needed to ensure we’re on the right path.
If you’re struggling to manage the tension between your dogs and are ready for real change, I’m here to help. Reach out anytime, and let’s turn the chaos into calm.

Bottom line: letting dogs fight it out isn’t the solution—it’s just the beginning of bigger problems. With the right approach, we can tackle the underlying issues, restore peace, and rebuild trust—because your home should be a safe place, not a battleground.

What's Your Dog's Drive and Why Aversive Tools Aren’t the AnswerI can still remember the first time I was told by a trai...
10/01/2024

What's Your Dog's Drive and Why Aversive Tools Aren’t the Answer

I can still remember the first time I was told by a trainer that a dog’s “drive” was too high. The trainer said it with a mix of pity and finality, like a doctor delivering bad news: “This one’s got a lot of drive—there’s no way to control it without a prong collar or something stronger....” Back then, it was almost as if “drive” was this mystical force that made some dogs inherently problematic, something that needed to be managed, restrained, or worse, shut down entirely. This was the beginning of my aversive journey trying to beat the Monster called 'DRIVE"

But as the decades went by, as I worked with dogs considered “unmanageable” by traditional standards, I began to see things differently. Those high-drive dogs weren’t out of control—they were misunderstood. They were expressing themselves in the only way they knew how, but they lacked the guidance and support to channel that energy - fueled by frustration, injustice and trauma- constructively. And here’s the most surprising thing: once you build a relationship based on trust and understanding, and help them overcome their emotional struggles, those so-called “high-drive” dogs become some of the most reliable, attentive, and connected companions you’ll ever meet.

So, why is it that we keep using drive as an excuse to reach for aversive tools like shock collars and prongs? Why are we still treating dogs as if they’re prisoners of their instincts, as if the only way to control their behavior is through pain or discomfort?

The truth is, dogs aren’t just reactive beings propelled by some invisible force. They are incredibly intelligent, sensitive creatures capable of learning to manage their own impulses—if we take the time to show them how.

What Drives a Dog?
Imagine you’re walking through your neighborhood when a squirrel darts across the street. Instantly, your dog’s head snaps up, muscles tense, and you can feel the energy coursing through the leash. You know what’s coming next: the pull, the chase, the complete oblivion to anything you say. “High prey drive,” someone might remark, shaking their head as if to say, “There’s no fixing that.”

But what are we really seeing in that moment? Is it just drive? Or is it the manifestation of years of selective breeding, combined with an instinctual response to movement, and a burst of pure, unfiltered energy that’s looking for an outlet?

Drive is more than just a singular motivation—it’s a complex cocktail of instinct, excitement, and focus. It’s what makes a Border Collie herd, a Labrador retrieve, or a Terrier dig. But it’s not a reason to give up and reach for forceful methods. Because drive, no matter how strong, is something that can be shaped, channeled, and even tamed—without resorting to pain or fear.

Why Aversive Tools Miss the field where the target is set?
There’s a persistent myth in the dog training world that strong drives require stronger methods. Trainers often argue that high-drive dogs won’t listen without a “correction,” that they’re too stubborn, too driven, too… something, to respond to positive reinforcement. But that mindset ignores one very important fact: dogs are not robots wired to obey based on the level of discomfort they feel. They are sentient beings who learn best when they feel safe, respected, and understood.

When we slap a shock collar on a dog to “control” its prey drive, we’re not teaching the dog anything except to fear the consequences of acting naturally. We’re not helping them develop self-control or emotional regulation; we’re just silencing the symptom, like covering a wound with a bandage instead of addressing the underlying infection.

I once worked with a Belgian Malinois named Zeus, whose drive for chasing cars was almost legendary. His previous trainer used a shock collar in an attempt to make him stop. And it did—for a while. But the drive was still there, simmering beneath the surface, and when that shock collar came off, Zeus became even more unpredictable and reactive. He wasn’t learning to control himself; he was just becoming more conflicted, torn between his urge to chase and his fear of pain.

It wasn’t until we began working with Zeus in a way that honored his natural drives, rather than punishing them, that we saw real change. We used his love for chasing and redirected it into games that allowed him to express his drive safely. We taught him impulse control through positive reinforcement, helping him learn to pause and think before reacting. And eventually, Zeus wasn’t just a dog with “too much drive”—he was a partner who could channel that energy into a balanced and joyful life.

Are Dogs Just Driven by Drive?
We like to believe that dogs are simply creatures of instinct, that they’re bound by their drives in a way that leaves no room for conscious choice. But I believe dogs are far more evolved than that. They have an ethical compass, a sense of right and wrong that comes into play when they feel secure and connected to their human family.

Think about the dog who will chase every cat in the neighborhood but will never so much as raise an eyebrow at their own family’s feline. Or the high-energy Labrador that will drop into a calm, almost meditative state when lying next to a sick child. These are not just behaviors conditioned by food or force; these are decisions made based on a deep sense of attachment and empathy. It’s as if, once a dog builds a secure attachment, they begin to operate on a more human-like level, where their drives become less about urges and more about choices.

Helping Dogs Manage Their Own Drives
When a dog feels understood and supported, they don’t just follow commands; they begin to exercise self-control. They start choosing not to chase that squirrel because they’ve learned that staying by your side is more rewarding. They choose to ignore the cat because they’ve internalized the boundaries of their home and family. They are capable of incredible self-regulation—something that aversive tools will never help them achieve.

Here’s how we can help dogs master their drives without suppressing their spirit:

Give Them Purposeful Outlets: Every drive needs a release. If your dog has a high prey drive, create structured games that allow them to chase, catch, and release safely. Tug games, flirt poles, or even agility can provide that outlet without putting your dog or others at risk.

Teach Them to Pause and Think: Use positive reinforcement to build impulse control exercises. Teach them to “wait” or “leave it” using treats, toys, or praise, rewarding them for the moments they choose to stop and think before reacting.

Build a Secure Attachment: When a dog feels securely attached, they begin to trust you as their guide. They look to you for cues, not because they fear the consequences of ignoring you, but because they want to maintain that connection. This creates a foundation where their drives no longer rule their behavior—they’re just one part of a larger relationship.

Create a Structured Environment: High-drive dogs thrive in environments where they know what’s expected of them. Consistency, routines, and clear boundaries help them understand what behaviors are appropriate and when it’s okay to let loose.

Engage Their Minds and Bodies: High-drive dogs aren’t just physically active—they’re mentally sharp, too. Scent work, puzzles, and advanced training can keep their minds engaged, preventing them from becoming frustrated or overstimulated.

Drive: Not a Problem to Be Fixed, But a Gift to Be Guided
Drive is not a problem—it’s a gift. It’s the part of a dog that fuels their enthusiasm, their joy, and their zest for life. When we embrace it, when we learn to work with it rather than against it, we see a side of our dogs that is truly magical: a side that is capable of self-control, choice, and a kind of partnership that transcends mere obedience.

So, the next time you hear someone say, “This dog has too much drive,” remember: it’s not about how much drive they have—it’s about how we help them channel it. Because in the end, drive isn’t a force to be feared or suppressed; it’s a doorway to understanding the incredible depth of our dogs’ potential.

In the hands of someone who sees drive for what it truly is, a high-drive dog isn’t a challenge—they’re a partner, waiting to show us just how far they can go. And with the right guidance, the answer is always: further than we ever imagined.
Need help achieving your goals? Message me to discuss how I can help you.

Every behavior tells a story, and every action has a reason. Dogs, like us, are shaped by their past experiences and pre...
09/30/2024

Every behavior tells a story, and every action has a reason. Dogs, like us, are shaped by their past experiences and present emotions. They don’t act out of malice but from confusion, fear, or unmet needs. Knowing this, no educated professional would resort to punishment. Instead, a true dog advocate recognizes that patience, empathy, and understanding are key to unraveling the complexities of a dog’s behavior. When we approach our dogs with compassion, we see not a problem to fix, but a companion struggling to communicate, deserving of our guidance, not correction.

Understand More. Grow Together. Care Deeply.
https://holisticdogacademy.thinkific.com/

This study, titled *Comparison of the Efficacy and Welfare of Different Training Methods in Stopping Chasing Behavior in...
09/12/2024

This study, titled *Comparison of the Efficacy and Welfare of Different Training Methods in Stopping Chasing Behavior in Dogs*, raises significant concerns about its methodology, ethical considerations, and the overall message it sends to the dog training community.

First off the study’s reliance on shock collars as a viable training method is not only outdated but also fails to acknowledge the long-term psychological harm these devices can cause to dogs. While aversive methods like e-collars might yield immediate results in controlling behaviors such as chasing, the real question is, at what cost? The researchers focused on short-term success while conveniently overlooking the well-documented long-term welfare risks associated with positive punishment techniques.

There are several studies that confirm these long-term risks:

- Vieira de Castro et al. (2020) found that dogs trained with aversive methods exhibited more stress-related behaviors during training, had higher cortisol levels after training, and were more "pessimistic" in a cognitive bias task compared to dogs trained with reward-based methods. This suggests negative impacts on both short-term and long-term welfare.
- Ziv (2017) concluded that aversive training methods like positive punishment and negative reinforcement can jeopardize both the physical and mental health of dogs.
- Blackwell et al. (2021) used a cognitive bias task and found that dogs trained using two or more aversive methods made more "pessimistic" judgments, indicating a more negative mood state and potential long-term welfare implications.
- Cooper et al. (2014) suggested greater welfare concerns with e-collar training compared to reward-based methods, even when e-collar manufacturers' guidelines were followed.
- Haverbeke et al. (2008), in a study of working dogs, found that aversive training methods negatively impacted team performance, suggesting potential long-term effects on welfare.

Oversight on Breed and Prey Drive Tendencies
Another glaring issue is that the study completely overlooks the significance of dog breeds and prey drive tendencies. The sample size was not only small—only 19 dogs completed the training—but all dogs were medium-to-large breeds, which raises questions about the selection criteria. Many dogs in this size range, especially working breeds, are naturally high prey-driven. This can significantly impact how they respond to stimuli like a moving lure, as these dogs may instinctively chase once they’ve engaged their prey drive (e.g., herding or hunting breeds). The study doesn’t differentiate or control for the natural tendencies of certain breeds to chase, making the results even less generalizable.

- Personal note: Prey drive is a deeply ingrained, instinctual behavior in many breeds. Expecting a high prey-drive dog to simply disengage from a moving object without considering the natural impulse to chase shows a lack of understanding of canine behavior. Breeds like Border Collies, German Shepherds, and other herding or hunting dogs are going to have a much harder time disengaging, and using a shock collar to suppress this natural instinct doesn't address the root of the behavior. It simply punishes the dog for following what it is biologically wired to do.

Additionally, no attention was paid to the **age** of the dogs, which can also affect behavior. Younger, more energetic dogs are far more likely to exhibit impulsive behaviors like chasing, especially when exposed to high-stimulation environments. The lack of data on how age and breed impacted the outcomes further weakens the study’s conclusions.

Lack of Baseline Behavior Assessment
The absence of a proper baseline behavior assessment also weakens the credibility of this research. Without thoroughly understanding each dog's behavioral tendencies before training, it’s impossible to gauge how much the training methods—whether shock collar or food-based—actually influenced the dogs’ behavior.

Flawed Positive Reinforcement Setup
Looking more closely at how the training was set up, the so-called “positive reinforcement” groups (Groups B and C) raise serious concerns. Their methods do not align with true positive reinforcement training principles. Here’s why:

1. Lack of Immediate Reward Timing
In the study, the word "banana" was used as a cue for the dog to stop chasing the lure, and a treat was dropped in a bowl 23 meters away from the dog. The dog had to return to the starting point to receive the reward. This method is flawed.

How it should work: Positive reinforcement relies on the **immediate** delivery of a reward to reinforce the desired behavior. Timing is critical—dogs need to understand exactly which behavior is being rewarded, and the reward should come **right after** the correct action. Expecting the dog to stop, turn around, and run back to a treat that’s meters away only creates confusion and weakens the association between the behavior and the reward.

2. No Direct Engagement with the Dog
The study allowed dogs to roam around the pen, with treats dropped into a metal bowl when the word "banana" was used. The trainers didn’t directly engage with the dogs.

How it should work: Positive reinforcement, especially in high-distraction environments, involves direct engagement between the trainer and the dog. Whether through food, toys, or praise, there needs to be clear communication connecting the trainer’s cues, the dog’s actions, and the reward. Dropping food into a bowl without interacting with the dog weakens the bond and effectiveness of reinforcement.

3. Failure to Compete with the Lure
The study acknowledges that chasing a moving object is inherently rewarding for dogs, but the training setup failed to address this effectively. The lure was still running while the dog was supposed to return to the start for a treat, which left the stronger, more appealing reward (chasing the lure) intact.

How it should work: Competing reinforcers need to be managed. Positive reinforcement training should make the alternative behavior (returning for a treat) **more rewarding** than chasing the lure. This can be achieved through high-value rewards or engaging games that mimic chase drive. The lure should have been stopped to avoid reinforcing the chase behavior.

4. Mismanaged Progression of Difficulty
In Group C, the lure started stationary but gradually increased in speed. However, the criteria for success were unclear, and as soon as the lure sped up, the dogs ignored the "banana" cue and continued chasing.

How it should work: Progression in difficulty should be **systematic**. If the dog is not reliably responding at a lower level, it’s inappropriate to move on to higher speeds. Training should only progress when the dog consistently demonstrates success at each step. This setup pushed the dogs too fast, setting them up for failure.

5. Inconsistent Reward Delivery
In Groups B and C, if a dog failed to return to the starting point, the treats were removed. This creates confusion for the dog and essentially turns into negative punishment, which is the opposite of what positive reinforcement should be.

How it should work: In positive reinforcement training, rewards should be consistent and predictable. If a dog performs the desired behavior, they **must** receive a reward. If they fail, the setup should be adjusted to make it easier, not by withholding the reward. Removing the treats without adjusting the criteria confuses the dog and undermines the learning process.

This Is Not How Positive Reinforcement Works
The training setup in the study was fundamentally flawed. Positive reinforcement training relies on:
- Immediate reward delivery following the correct behavior.
- Clear and direct engagement between the trainer and the dog.
- Ensuring the alternative behavior is **more rewarding** than the unwanted behavior.
- Gradual progression of difficulty, ensuring success at each step.
- Consistency in reward delivery, not confusion or punishment.

This study didn’t follow these principles, making it a poor representation of positive reinforcement training. Labeling it as such is misleading.

Trainer Bias and Ethical Oversight
The study’s trainers are another issue. Trainer 1, Balabanov, has over 30 years of experience in competitive dog sports, focusing on both aversive and non-aversive training methods. Trainer 2, Rashawn Willmore, was certified by Balabanov and also has experience using e-collars. Their background in aversive methods suggests a bias toward the effectiveness of shock collars, and this bias likely influenced the study’s design and results.

Most troubling, however, is the ethical oversight. The researchers argue that shock collars may be appropriate in the hands of expert trainers, but what about the countless dog owners who lack this level of expertise? Promoting the use of e-collars without fully addressing the potential for misuse and long-term harm is irresponsible and dangerous for the welfare of dogs.

To make matters worse, Balabanov has openly expressed his disdain for low-level e-collar conditioning in his podcasts, promoting harsher corrections. It’s no wonder the dogs in this study were subjected to unethical levels of correction. You can find Balabanov’s perspective on e-collars here: [Podcast Link](https://youtu.be/lQlJNX9BGoI?si=dP3SmzDkNChvn_Md).

Conclusion
In the end, this study tries to paint shock collars as an effective, “minimally harmful” tool, but it completely ignores the broader ethical and welfare implications. Its focus on immediate behavior suppression over long-term emotional well-being is a serious flaw in both the study's design and conclusions. Outdated, harmful methods like e-collars need to be left behind in favor of humane, positive reinforcement techniques that build trust and respect between dogs and their caregivers. This study misses the mark entirely.

What a joke!

Johnson, Anamarie C., and Clive D. L. Wynne. 2024. "Comparison of the Efficacy and Welfare of Different Training Methods in Stopping Chasing Behavior in Dogs" Animals 14, no. 18: 2632. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14182632

Address

83087 SIMONSEN Road
Eugene, OR
97405

Opening Hours

Wednesday 9am - 5pm
Thursday 9am - 5pm
Friday 9am - 5pm
Saturday 9am - 5pm
Sunday 9am - 5pm

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Roman's Holistic Dog Training posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to Roman's Holistic Dog Training:

Videos

Share

Category