12/27/2022
𝗕𝗮𝗹𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲𝗱 𝗗𝗼𝗴 𝗧𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴
Recently, I’ve been asking clients what they thought the phrase ‘balanced training’ might mean and the answers included…
“a mix of training & play”
“not expecting perfection”
“working to the individual dog’s strengths and weaknesses”
Which perhaps isn't surprising since 'balance' is a word which has positive connotations. Balanced diet. Work/Life balance. Strike a balance. It suggests stability & equilibrium.
𝙃𝙤𝙬𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙧....
..in the context of dog training what the term actually means is training which uses both positive reinforcement AND the use of punishment in the form of physical force, fear and intimidation. And, in many cases (at least as far as I can see), the use of positive reinforcement is often far scarcer, and comes far later in the process, than the use of punishment*.
The term "balanced training' is a euphemism for the use of force & physical punishment and a smokescreen to lure unsuspecting owners into trusting trainers who use compulsion based methods to teach.
So, the next time you see someone described (or describe themselves) as a 'balanced trainer' you'll see it for what it truly is.
* 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘤𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘪𝘴 𝘤𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘳…𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘶𝘴𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘢𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘪𝘷𝘦𝘴 𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘦𝘢𝘤𝘩 𝘥𝘰𝘨𝘴 𝘪𝘴 𝘣𝘰𝘵𝘩 𝘶𝘯𝘯𝘦𝘤𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘢𝘳𝘺 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘩𝘢𝘴 𝘢 𝘥𝘦𝘵𝘳𝘪𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘭 𝘦𝘧𝘧𝘦𝘤𝘵 𝘰𝘯 𝘥𝘰𝘨𝘴’ 𝘸𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘣𝘦𝘪𝘯𝘨.
𝘙𝘦𝘧𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦𝘴:
1. 𝘚𝘎 𝘍𝘳𝘪𝘦𝘥𝘮𝘢𝘯, 𝘞𝘩𝘢𝘵'𝘴 𝘞𝘳𝘰𝘯𝘨 𝘞𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘛𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘗𝘪𝘤𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘦? 𝘌𝘧𝘧𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘴 𝘪𝘴 𝘕𝘰𝘵 𝘌𝘯𝘰𝘶𝘨𝘩, 𝘈𝘗𝘋𝘛 𝘑𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘔𝘢𝘳𝘤𝘩/𝘈𝘱𝘳𝘪𝘭 2010
2. 𝘔 𝘚𝘪𝘥𝘮𝘢𝘯, 𝘊𝘰𝘦𝘳𝘤𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘐𝘵𝘴 𝘍𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘰𝘶𝘵 (𝘳𝘦𝘷 𝘦𝘥), 2000
3. 𝘎 𝘡𝘪𝘷, 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘦𝘧𝘧𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘶𝘴𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘢𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘮𝘦𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘥𝘴 𝘪𝘯 𝘥𝘰𝘨𝘴 - 𝘢 𝘳𝘦𝘷𝘪𝘦𝘸, 𝘑𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘰𝘧 𝘝𝘦𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘳𝘺 𝘉𝘦𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘪𝘰𝘳 19 (2017) 50-60
4. 𝘈 𝘊𝘢𝘵𝘢𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘢 𝘝𝘪𝘦𝘪𝘳𝘢 𝘥𝘦 𝘊𝘢𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘰, 𝘋 𝘍𝘶𝘤𝘩𝘴, 𝘎 𝘔𝘶𝘯𝘩𝘰𝘻 𝘔𝘰𝘳𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘰, 𝘚𝘵𝘦𝘧𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘢 𝘗𝘢𝘴𝘵𝘶𝘳, 𝘓 𝘥𝘦 𝘚𝘰𝘶𝘴𝘢, 𝘈𝘚 𝘖𝘭𝘴𝘴𝘰𝘯, 𝘋𝘰𝘦𝘴 𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘮𝘦𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘥 𝘮𝘢𝘵𝘵𝘦𝘳? 𝘌𝘷𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘯𝘦𝘨𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘪𝘮𝘱𝘢𝘤𝘵 𝘰𝘧 𝘢𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘪𝘷𝘦-𝘣𝘢𝘴𝘦𝘥 𝘮𝘦𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘥𝘴 𝘰𝘯 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘱𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘥𝘰𝘨 𝘸𝘦𝘭𝘧𝘢𝘳𝘦. 𝘗𝘓𝘖𝘚 𝘖𝘕𝘌, 2020; 15 (12)
5. 𝘈𝘮𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘯 𝘝𝘦𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘳𝘺 𝘚𝘰𝘤𝘪𝘦𝘵𝘺 𝘰𝘧 𝘈𝘯𝘪𝘮𝘢𝘭 𝘉𝘦𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘪𝘰𝘳 𝘗𝘰𝘴𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘚𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘰𝘯 𝘏𝘶𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘦 𝘋𝘰𝘨