04/25/2023
Borrowed from another page:
On the issue of what horses are
selling for;
Recently, in our neck of the woods there was a horse sale that has had various reviews on how it went. I've seen everything from strong disgust at what people are buying and for how much, to people rejoicing that broke horses may finally be bringing what they're worth. Nearly as old as time itself, the re-hashing of what was a "good deal" or a "bad deal" depends largely, I daresay, on if your perspective is from a buying or a selling position.
I have couple of frank observations to share.
The first is this; the actual value of anything that's put in the marketplace for sale is what someone is willing to pay for it.
Full stop.
Horses or any other thing that's offered for sale can have an asking value put on them by the seller, but the real value is determined by the marketplace. Actual value is determined by what the highest bidder is willing to pay. This is true and has been true since the beginning of the use of currency.
Next, and more important as far as I'm concerned is this; like this trend or not, we are seeing half-draft horses selling high, and often out selling registered stock horses. So here it is - the marketplace isn't wrong, it is the literal truth of the saying 'It is what it is'. It is indicating a trend and a truth in what's happening in the industry. We (that's the collective industry as a whole) must objectively re-evaluate what it is we are creating and turning out to the marketplace. If the marketplace is indicating to us what they want, then we are (generally) in need of a change.
I will submit to you my take on this, and as I tell anyone who rides with me, you can take it or leave it.
The equine industry, by & large, is dominated by amateur recreational riders who will never see the inside of a competition pen of any kind. By the law of averages, this means that the lions share of horses out there do not need to be competitive, they need to be amateur friendly, and this means disposition is paramount. One tail hair behind disposition is conformation, because non-competitive riders want horses that last for a lifetime of use. I can see why horses that are half draft achieve all of these things in the creation of a quiet, easy going nature in a horse with some height, bone circumference, hoof size, strong joints, etc. I realize that though this type of horse may not be the ideal for many in the stock horse industry, to me this inconvenient truth points to a bigger problem.
We're not creating what the marketplace wants.
We're so focused as breeders on making performance horses for the less than 10% of people that want to compete on them, we have a stingy, sensitive horse that isn't amateur friendly. (Yes I am generalizing, I realize this isn't an absolute truth in all cases at all times, but this is how I see it.) By and large, breeders focus on the empirical evidence of earnings to make breeding decisions, and nearly the entire industry is full of people who are attentive only to their chosen discipline and wear blinders to any family of horses outside of those known to perform in their particular discipline.
Don't take me the wrong way - I am not saying that discipline specific breeding focused first and foremost on earnings has created poor horses, but I think what we're seeing now is that it has created horses who are not filling the demands of the giant recreational users market. If you consider the old time QH, the horses that propelled the AQHA to become the largest breed registry in the world, they did it with characteristics that can be summed up in one word: Versatility.
Today's stock horses (primarily AQHA) are not typically bred or trained with versatility in mind, they are typically bred and trained with one discipline in mind. Certainly on the western side of the industry, it has led us to a place where we've (generally) lost height, body, bone, foot, and a quiet mind.
Breeding and the development of a breed is a science, without a doubt. It should be undertaken by people who can be objective when judging their own animals, who can see weaknesses and necessary points to improve on when making mating decisions, who know the consistent characteristics of the families of the animals listed on the registration papers, and who understand the necessity of culling. Other things like genetic test results and earnings should come into play too, though they should not be paramount in the decision making process of mating matches.
Just my take.
As always, I remain committed to what's best for our breed.
Ryan A. Fleetwood
Fleetwood Farms Quarter Horses