03/01/2025
Zak Standing on Business 👏🏼
There’s a persistent myth circulating in dog training circles, promoted by “balanced” trainers who say they start with positive reinforcement but escalate to punishment the moment it “stops working,” implying that positive methods alone are insufficient.
They often claim to understand positive reinforcement as "rewarding behaviors to increase their frequency," revealing they don’t actually grasp the comprehensive approach that modern training demands.
The argument commonly adds, “We only use leash corrections or shocks when the dog already knows the behavior but ‘chooses’ not to listen.”
The problem? This reasoning entirely overlooks the dog’s emotional state, neurological thresholds, and environmental stressors, making it embarrassingly out-of-touch with modern behavioral science.
Neuro-affirming dog training, backed by decades of research, offers a far more sophisticated approach.
It involves a deep understanding of a dog’s emotional state, cognitive abilities, and neurological limits helping them learn comfortably without stress or coercion.
Successful training is never just about rewarding behaviors or distracting dogs with treats.
It requires thoughtfully managing the dog’s environment, structuring scenarios that encourage desirable choices, and helping dogs regulate their emotions to ENHANCE learning and overall wellbeing.
These dogs aren’t “stubborn,” “dominant,” or “defiant.” In reality, they’re often neurologically overwhelmed and emotionally unable to learn effectively in that moment.
Skilled modern trainers and behaviorists recognize this, adjust their approach, reduce stressors, and keep dogs within their learning threshold. They do not escalate situations that trigger a cognitive cocktail of stress hormones, impairing productive learning.
For example, imagine a dog lunging aggressively at passing dogs. An outdated trainer might punish this behavior by yanking a metal collar around the dog’s neck or shocking them, which not only increases immediate stress but can also create negative associations with the environment, intensifying fear, anxiety, or aggression toward passing dogs over time.
In other words, punishment may temporarily suppress the lunging, but it often makes the underlying emotional reaction, and therefore the aggressive behavior, significantly worse in the long run.
In contrast, a neuro-affirming trainer would manage the environment first (creating distance from the passing dog), reinforce alternative behaviors like calmly looking back at their guardian, and gradually build genuine coping skills rather than forced compliance.
These methods empower dogs by providing agency, significantly lowering stress and dramatically improving learning outcomes.
Scientific research consistently demonstrates, across species, that this significantly reduces aggression, anxiety, and other behavioral issues compared to punitive methods.
To trainers who claim positive, neuro-affirming methods fall short, please consider answering these questions:
👉How specifically did you manage the environment to ensure the dog’s success?
👉What body language indicated the dog’s emotional and neurological thresholds, and how did you proactively respond?
👉Which clear alternative behaviors did you consistently reinforce, and how?
👉How precisely did you provide genuine agency, allowing meaningful choices and safe opportunities for the dog to opt-out?
👉In what concrete ways did your approach actively support the dog’s cognitive and emotional wellbeing?
If you’ve fully addressed these points and still experienced genuine failure, please share your scenario; I’m sincerely curious.
In short:
Effective, neuro-affirming dog training means proactively managing environments, recognizing emotional thresholds, reinforcing clear alternative behaviors, supporting emotional wellbeing, ensuring a dog‘s underlying needs are met , and empowering dogs through meaningful choice.
When done correctly, this approach doesn’t just occasionally succeed, it reliably transforms behavior and enriches lives.
To see these principles in action, check out my ultimate guide to reactivity (video included in the comments).
Sources and interesting reads:
1. Does training method matter? Evidence for the negative impact of aversive-based methods on companion dog welfare
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7743949/
2. Improving dog training methods: Efficacy and efficiency of reward-based training versus punishment-based training
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7895348/
3. Exploring relationships between dog training approaches and owner-reported behavior problems in companion dogs
https://academicworks.cuny.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2053&context=hc_sas_etds
4. The use of punishment and negative reinforcement in dog training
https://www.ava.com.au/policy-advocacy/policies/companion-animals-dog-behaviour/the-use-of-punishment-and-negative-reinforcement-in-dog-training/
5. Dog training methods: Their use, effectiveness and interaction with behaviour and welfare
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261106650_Dog_training_methods_Their_use_effectiveness_and_interaction_with_behaviour_and_welfare
6. The Effects of Dogs on Learning: A Meta-Analysis
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341337725_The_Effects_of_Dogs_on_Learning_A_Meta-Analysis
7. Stress and Dog Training
https://www.petprofessionalguild.com/barks/barks-magazine-blog/stress-and-dog-training/
Certified Dog Trainer, teaching guardians how to bond with their dog through Positive Reinforcement. 🧡
