12/05/2023
There is no research that supports the notion that correctly using food rewards aka positive reinforcement and low stress âsoftâ training methods makes horses inherently more dangerous.
The research, in fact, supports the opposite.
You want to know who is pushing the notion that horses fed food rewards end up being dangerous, pushy and without boundaries?
The people who are not trained in these methods.
The people who donât have an understanding of operant conditioning and thereby cannot fathom how you could possibly address unwanted behaviour without physical punishment.
And, so, they create the narrative in their heads that people who opt to use variable reinforcement of other behaviours, counter conditioning and addressing the root causes of stress are simply letting horses walk all over them.
That there are these mythical R+ horses who becoming human flesh eating monsters, to the point where R+ training needs to be labelled as dangerous and unsafeâŚ
But, thatâs simply untrue.
The research doesnât support it.
Ironically, in virtually all species, punishment has the highest risk factors of meeting aggressive, stressed and otherwise dangerous behaviours.
In virtually all species, positive reinforcement shows high success with minimal downfalls, unlike punishment.
Studies on horses show stressed horses are the most dangerous as this is when they engage in flight behaviours that injure humans.
Want to know what stresses horses?
Punishment.
Can you make a horse dangerous and pushy if you use R+ improperly?
Absolutely.
But, that requires improper use.
Positive punishment, even when timed and used âcorrectlyâ still sees behavioural fallout and deleterious behaviours because at its core it is a behavioural suppressant.
By all means, donât use food in training if you donât want to.
But donât be so desperate to vilify a method that you write fictional reasons as to why itâs dangerous.
People who are confident in the methods they use shouldnât feel in such competition with R+ that they need invent false reasons why they and others shouldnât use it.
Research doesnât lie, but people who are triggered by it sure do.
Sources:
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10888700802100942
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168159122001095
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1558787812000950
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0168159107002869
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/jaba.241
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2019.00350/full
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0003347209006034
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10071-010-0326-9
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/6/3/15
https://beva.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.2042-3292.2011.00296.x
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/jeab.653
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S135917890900038X
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1558787808001123
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0891524502883183