10/21/2025
You cannot train the horse that won't let you train them.
You cannot teach the horse that won't let you teach them.
You cannot administer body work to the horse who won't let you treat them.
You cannot vet a horse that won't let vetting happen to them.
You cannot care for a horse who won't let you care for them.
This is obvious, what is less obvious about this, is that compliance has nothing to do with it.
The great Tina Turner once sang, "What's love got to do with it?". I say "What's obedience got to do with it?" I have often seen leveraged obedience mask deep resentment, and quiet discontent in horses handled skilfully enough to BEHAVE like a happy horse, but not skilfully enough to BE a happy horse.
Just because a horse is DOING it, or allowing it to happen, does not mean they are receptive, or allowing it into their body.
Body Work treatment forced upon a horse is dead in the water in helping them be sounder. Training leveraged onto a horse, no matter how elegant and light it may look, can hide the deep misgivings the horse has about what is being done to them and with what tools. You can shove a medicine down a non-compliant horses throat but that horse will not be easier to handle next time just because you did it.
Which is why I continue to push back against the rhetoric shift in the horse world this year. Influencers whom 12 months ago promoted patience, connection and ethics, suddenly in 2025 came out stridently against the "Horse First" world, but this time using the "Horse First" vocabulary against the community they once spotlighted. The word for that is betrayal.
Let us not forget, that at the root of all training needs to live a horse who trusts you, likes you, and likes what is being done with them enough, that they co-sign whatever task it is that you chose on their behalf.
Without it, it is not Horsemanship.
It's -Manship.