ReBalance Expert

ReBalance Expert Health & Soundness for Horse & Rider through Balanced Riding, Biomechanics, Saddle, Hooves & Species Appropriate Lifestyle MSFC - www.msfc.nl/en/

04/24/2025

The horse world has changed more in the past 20 years than it did during the previous 40 years. The general focus on horsemanship has diminished while the focus on the riders and the disciplines has increased. The shift in focus away for the horse and onto the riders has not been good for horses.

Horsemanship, the training, riding and care for horses, has been declining not because of rule changes or misunderstandings. Many of the harmful "innovations" that have proved to be abusive of horses or dangerous for riders have come from individuals who, by leveraging their fame or success, spread flawed ideas and became rich.

We need to understand how this happens for two reasons. One is that by understanding equestrian history we gain context from which we can judge present and new methods. Many of these present methods are flawed. Another reason is so we can spot frauds, fakes and manipulators who sell bad training.

Many of these frauds and manipulators focus on reaching guru or elite influencer status on social media or with clinics. Others use their competition high profiles, and some are simply marketing geniuses. They all pretty much follow the same pattern of promoting "something new" that almost always is a shortcut to achieve something that otherwise requires a great deal of time to accomplish.

Recently I have put up two posts on flawed, once "new" innovations that caught on with the riding public and that increased their promoters' profile and wealth. Both of these innovations, the crest release and the forced frame of self carriage have big names behind them. These destructive shortcuts were promoted by individuals with enough fame to make people believe they were improvements to correct, time tested methods.

At left we see George Morris next to an image of a very restrictive crest release that impedes the horse's balance and movement. At right we see the Anky van Grunsven, author of the hyperflexion idea that has crushed free movement and interferes with a horse's balance and wellbeing.

I am warning new riders and horse owners that a substantial number of techniques and methods taught today come from flawed ideas of horsemanship. Some are dangerous to riders, and most are detrimental to horses.

These flaws catch on as riders demand to be taught these bad ideas because they are "easier" than the proper process of learning to ride. Because "easier sells" better than hard work, and because too many instructors are in it primarily for the money, riders must be careful and use critical thinking when exploring riding instruction programs.

A big red flag is promises of quick progress like, "You'll be showing within a year". Another is telling you that you should buy or lease a horse after a few lessons. Be suspicious of anything that speeds up what is a slow learning process or feels like it exploits your lack of experience. New riders are getting hurt and horses are being used up in the name of increased profits. Riding is a great pursuit but only when done correctly.

Morris innovation post link -

www.facebook.com/BobWoodHorsesForLife/posts/pfbid036661bPdsebxmL9M9H6bB2qK96Hy4zzjm1HhVAsMeW5mMJjv7JK2khmi8zVUi4977l

Anky innovation post link -
www.facebook.com/BobWoodHorsesForLife/posts/pfbid0vYwRA6oYtbMub7Zh7Vgyyvj4SHBWZnCtghySrMSFoA8UGYT1b2PxJpGCQBxbYPKul

04/24/2025
04/24/2025
04/17/2025
04/11/2025

04/11/2025

It all begins with a wooden tree.

04/11/2025

Wet block seats the traditional way as they say the old ways are the best.

04/11/2025
04/10/2025

From "Machinations About Mouth Pain in Dressage Horses" by Professor David Mellor, the "Godfather of animal welfare science" who has spent 30 years researching pain in non-human animals:

"Marked compression of the tongue (see the Crispin Johannessen’s Image Folder in Mellor 2024), plus pressure on the periosteum of the diastema, whether they occur alone or together, would be extremely painful (Mellor 2020). This would be exacerbated by any ischaemic pain generated within the segment of the tongue distal to the compression caused by the bit. To be very clear, the degree of compression of the tongue under the bit, and any such pressure on the periosteum of the mandible, each alone, or both together, would be extremely painful.

The degree of the bit-induced compression of the tongue apparent in Johannessen’s photographs indicates that blood flow distal to the bit would be severely reduced or stopped, potentially giving rise to ischaemic pain, well recognised as extremely noxious. Arguing about whether the distal tongue is blue or photographs of it have been manipulated is a clear diversionary tactic. This has no impact on the veracity of the first clear statements above, that bit-induced compression of the tongue and/or pressure on the periosteum of the mandible would be very painful independently of whether ischaemic pain may be involved as well."

Full article: https://horsesandpeople.com.au/machinations-about-mouth-pain-in-dressage-horses/?fbclid=IwY2xjawJGNzpleHRuA2FlbQIxMAABHToQAQVMX9j3C2xRd2eZVnjCr_jaVmzjU5BGuioexjQTYkvsflk7rhnHlA_aem_UbK0PY_q4PVOcR_275M41w

Photo copyright Crispin Parelius Johannessen

04/10/2025

So what makes good science?
First and foremost; who is doing the research? Does the researcher have a financial interest in the results of this study? Do they have a vested interest in the outcome? What is the researchers’ background and their education and beliefs? Do they have a commercial affiliation that may temper the interpretation of the results, or even the question asked. Put simply- who pays?
Do they have ethical approval? Forget the ethics application at your peril- the RCVS take it very seriously. Sue Dyson was struck off and all her previous work is now tainted for her 'forgetting' this crucial step.

What is the research question? Is it a nice and simple question, honed down to one aspect or variable? Can it be investigated or proved, right as well as wrong? How many confounding factors are in play? And finally and most importantly, has the question been expressed as a null hypothesis?

The null hypothesis is often stated as the assumption that there is no change, no difference between two groups, or no relationship between two variables. While this may seem like a maddening and artificial construct, it is crucial to remove the effects of confirmation bias. Most people want to prove they might be right.
Proving that they are not wrong is technically much harder.

Who are the research subjects? What size is the sample? Is the sample size large enough to draw relevant conclusions for a whole population? Is the study group representative of the more general population? Is there a control group? What is the control group? Is the control group relevant to the study?

Are the methods used reliable and reproducible? Do they produce the same results over and over? Could another researcher follow the methods and get the same results? This is about the replicability of the research and the accuracy of the procedures and research techniques.

Do the methods ensure that the research is free from error or bias on the part of the researcher, or the participants? (E.g. do the participants say what they believe the management, or the researcher, wants? )

Are the results valid? How successfully has the research actually achieved what it set out to achieve? Can the results of the study be transferred to other situations? Does x really cause y, in other words is the researcher correct in maintaining a causal link between these two variables? Is the research design sufficiently rigorous, have alternative explanations been considered? Have the findings really been accurately interpreted?

Can generalisations be made from the research results? Are the findings applicable in other research settings? Can a theory be developed that could apply to other populations? Are the results of the research transferable or can they applied to other situations?

And finally we circle back to the beginning again:

Ockham’s razor ; plurality should not be posited without necessity.” The principle gives precedence to simplicity: of two competing theories, the simplest explanation is usually the best.

So if we were to use the discussion example of what causes blue tongues in FEI dressage…

Null hypothesis- the incidence of blue tongue is not related to the extreme hyperflexed head position seen in FEI dressage.

Assumption on the part of the researcher- that hyper-flexion is needed for high collection

Study Sample group- FEI dressage riders in their usual competition tack.

Study Control group- ... follow this link yo read on https://open.substack.com/pub/lessonsfromnelipotcottage/p/cutting-edge-science?r=1fr8k6&utm_medium=ios

Picture is Alexis Martin- Vegue, USDF gold medallist on self trained horses- cites her influences as EDL, Mary Wanless, also uses R+ and is a certified Horsemanship Instructor

Address

TangleWood Acres, 1491 Tanglewood Drive
Placerville, CA
95667

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when ReBalance Expert posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to ReBalance Expert:

Share

Category