
22/06/2025
Mistakes are invitations - brilliant!
I had one of those moments the other day. You know the kind: I called Juno to come and she… didn’t. At all. She paused, looked directly at me, then trotted off in the exact opposite direction to sniff what I can only assume was a highly opinionated patch of grass.
And I stood there thinking, “Right. So… we’re doing that today.”
But here’s the thing. I didn’t correct her.
Not because I’m endlessly calm or above the occasional frustrated sigh. But because I’ve made an ethical commitment not to respond to uncertainty or error with pressure.
Instead, I got curious.
🐾 Did I interrupt something important to her?
🐾 Was the cue still meaningful in that context?
🐾 Had I reinforced “come to me” less than “go explore” lately?
🐾 Was this a breakdown in behaviour or in communication?
🐾Was the reinforcer less valuable in that context? Was something else more valuable in that moment?
In dog training, it’s easy to slip into the mindset of “She didn’t do it = she needs to be corrected.” But non-compliance isn’t a character flaw. It’s a clue. And "mistakes" (hers or mine, if you even what to call them that) are invitations to slow down and recalibrate, not tighten the screws.
So what do I do instead of correcting?
🔄 I reset the loop.
🎯 I reinforce the behaviours I do want to see, even if they’re approximations.
🧠 I reassess the conditions I’ve created.
💬 I treat every “error” as a conversation starter, not a power struggle.
Because training isn't about forcing dogs to comply. It’s about listening, adjusting, and co-creating a process where both of us feel safe enough to try again.
Mistakes will happen. That’s not the problem. The real question is, how do we respond? And that’s where ethics show up. In our smallest choices, especially when things go sideways.