
09/08/2025
If our performance expectations of our horses are changing for the better, shouldn't our assessment for pain change too?
-
For many people - I like to think certainly those that follow this page - we are getting better at recognising pain or discomfort without it being accompanied by a head-nod/hip-hike lameness or crazy wild behaviours that you would need to be a bronc rider to sit to.
We see the discomfort in the way the horse moves away from the saddle when you go to tack up, or the way they don't want to be touched in a specific area, or the change in facial expression when we ask them to do something different with their bodies, or the way they take the food from our hands when we are using R+.
And with this in mind, we do less with them - not because of a lack of skills - there is very little skill involved in making a horse comply - it's because we don't want to do anything that harms them.
We choose to not ride them. Or if we are riding, we choose to stick to things they can comfortably do. We work within their threshold not just physically, but also emotionally.
We have good observation skills - we ask ourselves, and the professionals around us: "when I do x, my horse does y. They are clearly finding this specific thing difficult. Why might that be?"
But I am finding that, more frequently than I feel comfortable admitting, people who have high expectations of their horse's welfare are often not taken seriously. Because they're not pushing their horses to display overt pain.
Their horses aren't going overtly lame because they are so good at listening to the little niggles that they're never pushed through the discomfort into fatigue to actually go lame.
Their horse isn't rearing or bucking because when they ask them to move forward but their horse resists, they stop asking rather than escalate the pressure.
They're not being thrown off because they see that their horse is unhappy being tacked up or mounted. So they don't get on.
-
In a standard lameness assessment, the horse will usually be walked and trotted up, followed by being lunged on hard and soft ground, followed by being ridden.
This is quite an ordeal for an animal experiencing pain.
But from my perspective, I find this to be an ordeal which oftentimes is completely unnecessary - because the indicators are usually already there in plain sight(!)
And whilst people might suggest that the less you do with your horse, the less there is to see, I would invite you to get better at observing because there is often quite a lot to see whilst doing significantly less!
Posture leads my assessment -
And whilst I appreciate it is simply a moment in time, many moments strung together equate to a long time and if your horse adopts a stance for a sustained period of time there will be a reason.
And posture isnt static. It's how your horse organises themselves around the field. It's whether their back moves when they tug from a hay net. It's how they choose to load each limb. It's how comfortable they are picking up their legs for you. [This is not an exhaustive list]
It's so much more than what frame they adopt under saddle (and I can tell how your horse might move under saddle by how they navigate all of the above)
Then I use palpation to support my postural assessment - that area that looks extended, can it flex if I ask it to? That area that looks restricted, can it move a little more than it does at rest?
If I try to get that area to move, what is the horse's reaction? What does their face do? What other behaviours do they do?
There is so much information to be gleaned from this without having to ride or lunge or antagonise.
So much information to be acquired without putting your horse through stressful, painful experiences.
-
I have had clients be told:
"In order to assess your horse for pain, they need to be in full work, trotting for 20 minutes per day" - the horse in question was refusing to move under saddle - how, dare I ask, would you envisage us making this horse move without using cruel tactics to do so?
"Your horse is old so likely to be riddled with arthritis and therefore there is no point in looking" - whilst simultaneously not helping them to put together a pain-management plan for the horse that is in obvious pain.
"They have arthritis, but it's the normal amount of arthritis" - as far as I am concerned, the normal amount of arthritis... is none?
"I can't see lameness present, therefore your horse is being naughty"
"Your horse doesn't palpate as sore, therefore they're just being naughty"
"There's nothing wrong, they just have tight hamstrings" - I swear if I hear tight hamstrings one more time I'm going to spontaneously combust.
Incidentally, people with ponies seem to be taken less seriously - I hypothesise because they are smaller and therefore easier to push around/punish/flood/train with fear - because if a big horse is throwing itself around it's scary and dangerous, if a pony is throwing itself around it is an inconvenience.
-
I am not writing this to bash any professional. I am acutely aware that every healthcare professional is doing their best and that the job is not easy and we all miss things because we are human -
I am writing this to invite anyone who works with horses to DO BETTER.
Ask questions.
Be curious.
Palpate.
Palpate again.
And please, please, please -
If you dont know what the problem is. Tell your client. Support them in finding a solution.
Do not fob people off that there is nothing wrong with their horse when the chance is you just do not currently have the skills to see it.
-
LS Horsemanship and I are doing a live this evening discussing all of the above and more. We would love to see you there at 7pm BST.
šø Olivia Rose Photography