11/18/2022
Yes, there are bad dogs.
This has become an incredibly popular cliché/saying/trope over the years. Besides having an easy poetic roll off the tongue, and an even easier roll off the brain, it’s not only wrong, it’s also highly damaging to owners who find themselves with such a dog.
We seem to love these intellectually simple, but seemingly morally high-minded catch-phrases. They let the brain off the hook as far as having to do any actual thinking, and they perpetuate/support/push concepts which we think will make us sound smart and good.
Here’s the thing, I know the goal of the phrase is/was to shift the once common belief that any issues in behavior were always the dog’s fault. And that was an important belief/narrative to disassemble. But, like with many things we want to shift into a more healthy space, we often go WAY too far to the other end of the spectrum. Which means we end up with the complete inverse—which is just as wrong, and just as unhelpful, and just as damaging.
So now we’re bombarded with the ridiculously overly simplistic, and false adage of “No bad dogs, only bad owners.” As if every dog out there is genetically put together identically, and none are truly problematic or damaged.
If you’ve worked with a good number of dogs, and if you’ve had your eyes open, and if you’re honest, you know how silly this saying is, and how it absolutely doesn’t reflect reality. You know there are dogs who are easy, dogs who are less so, dogs who are difficult, dogs who are extremely difficult, and dogs who are downright dangerous/damaged…period.
It’s a very wide, and diverse genetic spectrum, which contributes to wide and diverse behavior—regardless of the owner or their “goodness” or badness”. It’s simply the foundation of who the dog is.
And yes, while if the owner is “good” or not doesn’t change who the dog is fundamentally, the owner’s behavior CAN have an enormous impact on how the dog ultimately adapts and behaves. So this awareness and responsibility can’t be understated. But it also can’t be overstated. It needs to be thoughtful, nuanced, measured, free of marketing agenda, and most important…honest.
There are bad dogs, there are bad owners. Lets stop trying to oversimplify, and demonize one side or the other. We’re simply playing the same game, but in reverse, and by obfuscating reality, we serve neither dog nor owner.
PS, also, the word choice of “bad” is incredibly loaded, and unfair. I’m using it because it’s the wording in the saying. But “bad” dogs don’t choose to fall into that category, so it’s not an act of will, it’s the lottery of nature.
PPS, and yes, there are dogs who are neglected or mistreated who turn into “bad” dogs, but this post isn’t about the obvious, it’s about the far less obvious—the dogs who show up with temperament issues, often as puppies, in caring, loving, and smart homes, with solid training and guidance, and still present serious problems.
PPPS, and one could make the unpopular argument that even the dogs who’ve been neglected or mistreated, if they were of more robust/resilient genetic stock, they would still never veer into the realm of ”bad” dogs. But that’s a convo most folks aren’t yet ready for.