Cattle fattening

Cattle fattening Beef cattle are cattle raised for meat production (as distinguished from dairy cattle, used for milk Where Can I Get Information? commercial). terminal breeds.
(1)

Each beef cattle enterprise has different resources: land, labor, capital, feed and management. To raise beef cattle profitably, you must manage these resources to maximize returns. Below are some guidelines to make this enterprise successful. A large amount of information is available on beef production through books and magazines. With the electronic age, you can also access information over the

internet from many universities and in particular, their Extension systems. For copies of printed information, you can also visit your local Extension Office. Other suggestions for developing a working knowledge of beef production are to join a local beef producers organization and visit with other local producers. Most producers are more than happy to share their knowledge. Be sure to visit their operations also for ideas on handling, management, and breeds. Another important person to gain knowledge from is your veterinarian. Discuss health concerns and management suggestions with your vet. What Type of Cattle Should I Raise? Normally, the sole source of your income from a beef operation will come from the calves produced each year. So, it is important that your cows produce a calf at least every 12 months. Be conscious of selecting as well as keeping good productive cows who will produce a calf every year without assistance, maintain their body condition without becoming overly thin or fat, and raise a calf with an average weaning weight that meets your goals. Other considerations to make when choosing cows are the breed and what type of operation (purebred vs. Breeds of Beef Cattle
Beef cattle are generally divided into two different groups: maternal breeds vs. Generally, maternal breeds are known for their milk production and mothering ability while terminal breeds are known for their growth and meat producing ability. As with anything in life, there are some exceptions to this rule. Some breeds are also known as dual purpose breeds because they combine muscling for meat production with excellent maternal characteristics. For more information on breeds of beef cattle, visit the Oklahoma State Beef Breeds Directory. Crossbreeding can help you to combine the best attributes of individual breeds into one package. Choose traits that are important to you and then seek a breed or a crossbred that exhibits those traits. Type of Operation
Before you get started in the beef business, you will need to ask yourself what type of operation you would like to run. Some of the typical options are cow/calf, backgrounding feeder calves, or feedlot. The cow/calf producer keeps a herd of cows to produce calves. The backgrounder buys weaned calves and turns them out on pastures until they reach 800 to 900 pounds. The feedlot operator purchases weaned calves or backgrounded calves and feeds them to market weight. If you choose to become a cow/calf operation, you will also need to decide whether you would like to run a purebred or a commercial operation. A purebred operation typically raises cattle of one breed. Often a purebred operation will have all registered cattle that can also be sold through purebred sales. A commercial operation may have unregistered purebred cattle or they may have crossbred cattle. Commercial producers can have the benefit of hybrid vigor which is simply the ability of crossbred offspring to increase in productivity over the average of the breeds that were part of the cross. This means that a crossbred calf could grow faster and thus weigh more at a certain age than either of its parents. Many purebred sales are held across the country throughout the year. Sales may offer only one breed or they may offer a large variety of breeds for sale. Also, you may want to become familiar with trends in the beef industry when choosing breeding stock. Choose bulls that will compliment the outstanding traits in your cows and improve their weaknesses. Cows for a commercial operation can be bought at a purebred sale and then used in a crossbreeding program or you can contact individual producers to buy larger numbers of heifers that could be purebreds or crossbreds. Another option is to buy animals through an auction barn. Be aware however, that you are more likely to buy problem cattle through an auction barn. Unless a producer sells all his calves through the auction, he may be selling only cull calves. Beef producers who purchase calves to background or place in a feedlot often purchase calves directly from a cow/calf operator. They may also purchase calves through feeder calf sales. Most buyers will pay more for calves that have been weaned, dewormed and vaccinated because the likelihood of calves getting sick is greatly reduced. Beef Operation Management
Management of a beef operation depends largely on the interests of the producer as well as the resources available such as land, feed, facilities, and others. Management systems will vary depending on the climate. Operations that have hard winters will want to provide access to shelter for the cows during extremely cold weather and during periods of cold rain. Facilities
Facilities for beef operations will vary from fencing to barns, sheds or shelters. Again, facility requirements will depend on whether your operation runs cattle only through the summer months or all year. Any operation should have some type of handling system that allows a producer to easily catch and restrain an animal for routine health care procedures. The handling system should include a corral system with a chute that leads to a head-gate. A beef facility may also need feeding facilities. This could be as simple as a mineral feeder for a backgrounding operation. Or, it may include barns and grain and hay feeders for the cow/calf operation. In addition, a feedlot operation will need to account for adequate bunk or feeder space for the number of animals that are being fed. A general rule of thumb for feeder space is to provide 18 to 22 inches for calves up to 600 pounds, 22 to 26 inches per head for calves 600 pounds to market weight, 26 to 30 inches per head for mature cows, and 14 to 18 inches per head for calves. If you have feed available at all times, these sizes can be decreased.

04/02/2023
20/10/2022

Cattle fattening is a livestock production practice that reduces animal movements thereby fattening cattle more quickly. Larger animals can be sold for more money on the market as they yield more meat.
Cattle fattening farming business is a very profitable business, and many people are making money all over the world by doing cattle livestock farming business.
Cattle fattening involves the feeding of beef cattle with a protein balanced, high-energy diet for a period of about 90 days or more under confinement to increase live weights and improve degree of finish and thus obtain better grades at the abattoir.
To build a successful, sustainable cattle fattening business, you require sufficient knowledge of how to efficiently do cattle pen fattening i.e. cattle fattening techniques, good management skills, and a good business plan.

Behavioral AnalysisIn accordance with Endres et al. (19), each behavior was assumed to persist for the entire sample int...
20/10/2022

Behavioral Analysis
In accordance with Endres et al. (19), each behavior was assumed to persist for the entire sample interval. Therefore, the duration of each performed behavioral pattern was calculated by multiplying the number of the correspondent sample intervals with 2 or 10. For the behavioral observations at herd level, the percentage of animals performing each behavior was averaged for each interval for all days. To assess behavioral synchronization the percentage of time a certain number of animals spent feeding or lying was averaged for all groups and days. The variables calculated per animal at individual level are listed in Table 4. Mean and SD of the percentage of time spent feeding and lying per 18.5 h-period were calculated for each single animal for all days. Furthermore, the mean bout length and the mean number of bouts per 18.5 h-period were determined. After each observed feed delivery, the position of each animal within the order of animals feeding after feed delivery was determined. Furthermore, for each single animal, the percentage of feed deliveries with following feeding behavior was calculated.

Behavioral ObservationsBehavioral observations were performed by analyzing video recordings. The animals were videotaped...
20/10/2022

Behavioral Observations
Behavioral observations were performed by analyzing video recordings. The animals were videotaped with two video cameras (EQ900F, EverFocus Electronics Corporation, Taipei, Taiwan) and an eight-channel hybrid recorder (AXR-108, Monacor International GmbH & Co. KG, Bremen, Germany). The cameras were located above the pens covering two full pens each. Individual animals were identified and listed by the color and patterns of their fur.
The video analyses were performed using the program Interact (Version 17.0.1.2, Mangold International GmbH, Arnstorf, Germany) for observational research. For the group-based evaluation, the activity of the animals was observed for 48 h per OP using a scan-sampling-technique (17). In intervals of 2 min from 4:00 to 23:30 h and 10 min during the night (23:30–4:00 h), the number of animals feeding and lying was recorded. At an individual level, the behavior of all animals was scanned at intervals of 10 min from 4:00 to 22:30 h on 3 consecutive days per OP using a combination of scan sampling and focal animal sampling . The 10 min-interval was chosen in accordance with Mitlohner et al and Endres et al. The recorded and analyzed behavior patterns were feeding and lying. Lying included bulls that were observed in sternal as well as in total lateral recumbency from the end of the lying-down movement until the end of the standing-up movement. An animal was considered to be feeding when its head was completely past the feed rail and above the feed while ingesting the feed.

Body Condition and Health ScoringThe data acquisition began when the final groups had existed for at least 3 weeks. It w...
20/10/2022

Body Condition and Health Scoring
The data acquisition began when the final groups had existed for at least 3 weeks. It was performed during three OP at an average of 338, 407, and 476 days of age, respectively (approximately at an age of 11, 14, and 16 months, respectively). The OP was defined as a 4 day-period of data acquisition, beginning with body condition and health scoring on the first day and continuing with 3 days of continuous video recording at the following 3 days. At the beginning of each OP, all individual animals were individually scored for body condition and health status by one trained observer. The bulls' body condition was assessed following the body condition score (BCS) system described by Edmonson et al. with scores ranging from 1 (emaciated condition) to 5 (obese condition) in steps of 0.5 . Bulls' health status was assessed considering the welfare criteria for health assessment listed in the Welfare Quality® assessment protocol for cattle. The analyzed criteria are listed in Table 3. In addition to observations during scoring, bulls' health was monitored by the farmer. In consultation with his farm veterinarian, he documented any pathological event that occurred during the fattening period as well as drug use.

The animals arrived on the farm at about 5 months of age (148 ± 11 days). In the following 3 months, they were assigned ...
20/10/2022

The animals arrived on the farm at about 5 months of age (148 ± 11 days). In the following 3 months, they were assigned to groups of 14 animals each according to their body weight. For the study, four groups of similar body weight were selected. These groups remained constant until the end of the fattening period. The only exception was group 3 from which one animal (animal 32) was removed after the first observation period (OP), explained below, due to reduced feeding and growth. Animals were slaughtered at an age of 558 ± 20 days and carcass weights were provided by the slaughterhouse.

Further positive effects of an increased feeding frequency are known from studies on dairy cattle regarding an increase ...
20/10/2022

Further positive effects of an increased feeding frequency are known from studies on dairy cattle regarding an increase in the time spent feeding as well as in dry matter intake
Furthermore, increasing feeding frequency led to decreased diurnal variation in ruminal pH possibly reducing the risk of subacute ruminal acidosis. However, all these results refer to dairy cattle and heifers, while currently no scientific studies at all exist concerning the influence of feeding frequency on behavior, health, or growth performance of fattening cattle. Nonetheless, the impact of feeding frequency is not only important regarding the suitability or benefits of an AFS for fattening cattle, but also concerning the current practice of feeding fattening cattle only once or twice per day. Therefore, the objective of the present study was to generally describe behavior and performance of fattening bulls fed at a high frequency, namely six times per day using an AFS.

Automatic feeding is gaining more and more importance in dairy cattle farming. Main reasons to install an automatic feed...
20/10/2022

Automatic feeding is gaining more and more importance in dairy cattle farming. Main reasons to install an automatic feeding system (AFS) are its contributions to a reduction in workload and working time as well as increasing flexibility. However, benefits of AFS are not restricted to management factors. Permitting an increasing feeding frequency without increasing costs or workload they also offer possibilities to positively influence behavior, productivity and health of cattle
Up to now, AFS have been rarely used in housing systems for fattening cattle, despite their advantages being transferable from dairy to fattening cattle. Fattening cattle are commonly fed twice per day, in the morning and in the evening or even only once in the morning, using an ad libitum feeding regimen. On pasture, cattle spend about 10–12 h per day grazing, divided into several meals spread out from dusk to dawn (6). The feeding duration of housed cattle is reduced to 4–7 h per day, but feeding is still divided into 6–12 daily meals spread out over the daylight period (6, 7). As cattle are selective feeders while consuming conserved feed, feed composition, palatability and, therefore, possibly also feed quality is likely to decline with increasing time after feed delivery. This could have detrimental effects on nutrition, as cattle tend to spread out their feeding behavior over the course of the day. The pre-selected ration they receive with increasing time after feeding may not fulfill their nutrient requirements. An increasing frequency of feed deliveries spread out across the day could contribute to ensuring not only constant feed availability but also constant feed quality. Using an AFS allows such a feed delivery pattern without increasing workload for farmers.

The usage of automatic feeding systems (AFS) in cattle offers multiple advantages, mostly due to the possibility of an i...
20/10/2022

The usage of automatic feeding systems (AFS) in cattle offers multiple advantages, mostly due to the possibility of an increased feeding frequency. While it is gaining more and more importance in dairy farming, there is still a lack of experience and scientific knowledge regarding its use in fattening cattle. The aim of this study was to describe the behavior of 56 Simmental bulls fed with an AFS six times daily a total mixed ration. The animals arrived at the farm with an average age of 148 ± 11 days. They were housed in four straw-bedded pens in groups of 14 animals each. Their average slaughter age was 558 ± 20 days. Behavioral observations were made during three observation periods (OP) at an average of 11, 14, and 16 months of age. Using scan sampling, feeding, and lying behavior of all animals and the order of bulls feeding after feed delivery were recorded. Furthermore, body condition and health status were monitored and complemented with the carcass weights. Body condition, health status, and carcass weights of the bulls were found to be satisfactory: Mean body condition score increased from 2.8 ± 0.3 in OP1 to 3.0 ± 0.1 in OP3 and mean carcass weight was 432.71 ± 40.82 kg. No severe health problems occurred. The feeding activity of the bulls was spread out over the course of the day with peaks in the afternoon and evening. Percentages of bulls feeding per pen never exceeded 20%, animals feeding mostly alone (during 28.04 ± 2.15% of total observation time) or in groups of two to three (16.61 ± 2.00% and 6.74 ± 1.90%). The order of bulls feeding after feed delivery varied indicating that all animals had similar access to fresh feed. These results emphasize the importance of constant feed availability and quality at any time of the day, thus indicating the ability of an AFS with six daily feedings to ensure such a consistency.

22/09/2022
27/05/2022

Ethiopia has the largest livestock population in Africa that has been contributing a considerable portion to the economy of the country and still promising potential for the economic development of the country. A study by Behnke and Metaferia (2011) indicated that the livestock sector contributes about 47% to the Agricultural Gross Domestic Product (AGDP), including monetary values and non-marketed services (traction and manure) in Ethiopia. Hence, livestock remains a pillar for food security, human nutrition, and the economic growth of the county (Shapiro et al., 2015).
In developing countries including Ethiopia, demand for human foods of animal origin is increasing from time to time due to human population growth, rise in income, and urbanization (Thornton, 2010) which could be seen as an opportunity to benefit from the livestock sector. However, the contribution of the Ethiopian livestock resource to human nutrition and export earning of the country is disproportionately low due to the poor productivity of the animals as compared to the regional and continental average (Behnke & Metaferia, 2011). This is mainly due to the low quality and insufficient feed supply (Gebremedhin et al., 2007).
Nowadays, cattle fattening is becoming an important livestock farming activity especially in urban and peri-urban areas of the country (Halala, 2015). There are large numbers of smallholder farmers engaged in livestock fattening activities (Woldu, 2004). The growing population, urbanization, and economic growth are contributing to the growing demand for livestock, and livestock products particularly meat is one of the main products from cattle fattening in Ethiopia (Halala, 2015).
However, the potential of cattle fattening in these systems has not been fully utilized for several reasons including a lack of appropriate information and inputs. Understanding the system could help devise possible solutions and ways. In this regard, several research activities have been carried out elsewhere in Ethiopia (Abebe & Urge, 2014; Ahmed et al., 2016, 2017). However, the system is variable based on the resources available like feeds and feeding, the breeds, market accessibility. The urban and peri-urban beef cattle production system is immerging recently (FAO, 2019). Therefore, it is essential to generate information regarding urban and peri-urban cattle fattening practices and evaluate the fattening performance of local cattle types for a specific locality. This study was, therefore, conducted to assess the cattle fattening practices, describe the potential and challenge of the sector, and evaluate the fattening performances of the animals by small-scale cattle fatteners in and around Dangila town.

27/05/2022

The study was conducted in Dangila town, Ethiopia, to assess the cattle fattening practices and fattening performances of cattle in the area. A semi-structured questionnaire survey and on-farm monitoring of fattening cattle were carried out. A total of 200 cattle fatteners (160 from peri-urban and 40 fatteners urban) were included in the survey. Fattening was monitored for weight change. The initial, the middle, and final body weights were taken using a heart girth meter. The survey data was analyzed and summarized using descriptive statistics and index ranking. Monitoring data was analyzed using the General Linear Model Procedure of SPSS. The mean family size, age of household heads, and landholding were 5.15, 38.04 years, and 0.2 hectares, respectively. Respondents had average fattening experiences of 4.36 ± 3.03 years and fatten 2.24 ± 2.74 cattle per cycle. Body size/frame (index = 0.485) and the health condition of animals (index = 0.162) were the first and second selection criteria to purchase fattening animals. Crop residue (index = 0.26) and agro-industrial by-products (index = 0.33) were the first used feedstuffs in the peri-urban and urban systems, respectively. The mean final body weight of fattening animals was 365.443 ± 1.51 kg with a mean fattening duration of 107.38 + 0.58 days. Feed shortage was the first challenge that fattening households are facing in the peri-urban (index = 0.331) and urban areas (index = 0.290) of Dangila district. The result indicated that cattle fatteners should get the proper advice on animal selection and duration of fattening, feeding, and accessibility to credit service.

27/05/2022

Ethiopia has the largest livestock population in Africa that has been contributing a considerable portion to the economy of the country and still promising potential for the economic development of the country. A study by Behnke and Metaferia (2011) indicated that the livestock sector contributes about 47% to the Agricultural Gross Domestic Product (AGDP), including monetary values and non-marketed services (traction and manure) in Ethiopia. Hence, livestock remains a pillar for food security, human nutrition, and the economic growth of the county (Shapiro et al., 2015).

In developing countries including Ethiopia, demand for human foods of animal origin is increasing from time to time due to human population growth, rise in income, and urbanization (Thornton, 2010) which could be seen as an opportunity to benefit from the livestock sector. However, the contribution of the Ethiopian livestock resource to human nutrition and export earning of the country is disproportionately low due to the poor productivity of the animals as compared to the regional and continental average (Behnke & Metaferia, 2011). This is mainly due to the low quality and insufficient feed supply (Gebremedhin et al., 2007).

Nowadays, cattle fattening is becoming an important livestock farming activity especially in urban and peri-urban areas of the country (Halala, 2015). There are large numbers of smallholder farmers engaged in livestock fattening activities (Woldu, 2004). The growing population, urbanization, and economic growth are contributing to the growing demand for livestock, and livestock products particularly meat is one of the main products from cattle fattening in Ethiopia (Halala, 2015).
However, the potential of cattle fattening in these systems has not been fully utilized for several reasons including a lack of appropriate information and inputs. Understanding the system could help devise possible solutions and ways. In this regard, several research activities have been carried out elsewhere in Ethiopia (Abebe & Urge, 2014; Ahmed et al., 2016, 2017). However, the system is variable based on the resources available like feeds and feeding, the breeds, market accessibility. The urban and peri-urban beef cattle production system is immerging recently (FAO, 2019). Therefore, it is essential to generate information regarding urban and peri-urban cattle fattening practices and evaluate the fattening performance of local cattle types for a specific locality. This study was, therefore, conducted to assess the cattle fattening practices, describe the potential and challenge of the sector, and evaluate the fattening performances of the animals by small-scale cattle fatteners in and around Dangila town.

Beef cattle are cattle raised for meat production (as distinguished from dairy cattle, used for milk

17/01/2022

Consideration of the targeted markets
Whether in farrow-to-finish farms or fattening ones, farmers must take into account the type of products required by their target markets to set up their productions goals: weanlings, calves aged less than 12 months, young calves aged 14 to 16 months... Prior knowledge of the commercial targets allows for the determination of objectives concerning weight, average daily gain (ADG), fat cover, color of meat, etc. This will help them to decide the type of diet to implement (dry diet, semi-dry diet, wet diet), the dietary levels needed and the most appropriate feeding program to apply.

Analysis of the current situation
Achieving these goals requires a good overview and a thorough understanding of the current farming systems in use. At this point, undertaking a practical audit of the farm will help to identify the areas for improvement from a technical and economic point of view. In addition, performance modellings allowed by management tools are usually used in farrow to finish farms, and the teachings of market data (purchase price for calves, selling price of young bulls, the feeding program cost, etc.) will allow to determine profit margins.

Elaboration of a customised dietary program
A specific dietary program based on the farm’s technical and economic optimum can then be set up. This program should include the following:

optimisation of livestock resources: forages, feeds, additive minerals, raw materials and co-products available;
consideration of animals’ growth potential: ADG (Average Daily Gain) potential, growth curve
turn-over of young calves’
margin targets.
All these objectives are designed to choose the most suitable routes from a techno-economic standpoint. Data related to the desired objectives and the specificities of each farm can then be entered into an economic optimization software. This software will then allow to calculate the required nutritional needs thereby suggesting the most suitable feeding program.

How can one find the best-fitting program? An overall knowledge of the nutritional values of the resources held in the farm (forages, raw material ...) and consideration of production targets will help to determine the extent to which these resources can be used in the diet, as well as the most suitable feed supplements to use. These feed supplements will help compensate for the diet's identified deficiencies and limitations in terms of energy profiles, nitrogen, fibrous mineral of the basic diet).
Upon designing the diet, the consideration of certain criteria will contribute to a more accurate management of the respective fattening phases: adaptation / start / growth / finishing. The other benefit of such precautions is that digestive upsets that are likely to occur at this stage will be more controlled and hence better prevented.
An unsuitable feeding program could result in underperformances and digestive disorders (acidosis, enterotoxemia ...), with often heavy consequences: inefficient utilization of diets, lower daily weight gain for beef cattle, decreased performance, lameness, death ... .
Furthermore, the incorporation of additive solutions in the diet can enhance the benefits of nutrients so they can be assumed to their full potential. To this end, some additive solutions can guarantee a secure optimisation of young calves’ growth. The action mode of these solutions consists of orientating ruminal fermentations to produce propionic acid ; propionic acid has a favorable effect on muscle growth. Since they also contribute to contain methane emissions, these solutions also limit energy waste.

Final stage: application of solutions implemented
A final comparison between the diet that has actually been fed and their ensuing weight gain will provide an accurate techno-economic evaluation of the recently implemented program. This evaluation will help to determine areas for improvement with regard to rearing conditions and the appropriate feeding methods to apply.

Would you like to optimise the growth performance of your beef cattle? The TECHNA Group experts can assist you throughout the various stages of your projects. Whether you need to undertake audits, use management tools, to make decisions, to implement specific nutritional programs, use optimisation softwares or to just improve your feeding programs, our experts can provide you with customised solutions to help you to achieve your goals. For more information, please consult experts!

20/11/2021
Beef cattle are cattle raised for meat production (as distinguished from dairy cattle, used for milk production). The me...
05/04/2021

Beef cattle are cattle raised for meat production (as distinguished from dairy cattle, used for milk production). The meat of mature or almost mature cattle is mostly known as beef. In beef production there are three main stages: cow-calf operations, backgrounding, and feedlot operations. The production cycle of the animals start at cow-calf operations; this operation is designed specifically to breed cows for their offspring. From here the calves are backgrounded for a feedlot. Animals grown specifically for the feedlot are known as feeder cattle, the goal of these animals is fattening. Animals not grown for a feedlot are typically female and are commonly known as replacement heifers. While the principal use of beef cattle is meat production, other uses include leather, and beef by-products used in candy, shampoo, cosmetics, insulin and inhalers.

Contents
1 Calving and breeding
2 Cattle maintenance
3 Cattle processing
4 Breeds
5 See also
6 References
7 External links
Calving and breeding
Besides breeding to meet the demand for beef production, owners also use selective breeding to attain specific traits in their beef cattle. An example of a desired trait could be leaner meat[1] or resistance to illness.[2] Breeds known as dual-purpose are also used for beef production. These breeds have been selected for two purposes at once, such as both beef and dairy production, or both beef and draught. Dual-purpose breeds include many of the Zebu breeds of India such as Tharparkar and Ongole Cattle. There are multiple continental breeds that were bred for this purpose as well. The original Simmental/Fleckvieh from Switzerland is a prime example. Not only are they a dual-purpose breed for beef and dairy, but in the past they were also used for draught. However, throughout the generations, the breed has diverged into two groups through selective breeding.[3]

Most beef cattle are mated naturally, whereby a bull is released into a cowherd approximately 55 days after the calving period, depending on the cows' body condition score (BCS). If it was a cow's first time calving, she will take longer to re-breed by at least 10 days.[4] However, beef cattle can also be bred through artificial insemination,[1] depending on the cow and the size of the herd. Cattle are normally bred during the summer so that calving may occur the following spring.[1] However, cattle breeding can occur at other times of year. Depending on the operation, calving may occur all year round. Owners can select the breeding time based on a number of factors, including reproductive performance, seasonal cattle pricing and handling facilities.[1]

There are many factors that come into play when selecting for a bull. Some of the most important factors are disease prevention/spread. Buying a bull who hasn't been tested for common diseases is a risk, it would more than likely transmit to a whole herd. Purchasing genetics that will improve the original herd rather than remaining the same or decreasing. Some breed for mothering abilities, some for size, some for meat properties, etc. Breeding Soundness Examination or BSE are essential to the quality of any bull, a general physical exam and inspection of both the ge***al organs and their productivity.[5] Knowing more information about the animal will help make an educated decision.

Cattle maintenance
Cattle handlers are expected to maintain a low stress environment for their herds, involving constant safety, health, comfort, nourishment and humane handling. According to the Canadian National Farm Animal Care Council, beef cattle must have access to shelter from extreme weather, safe handling and equipment, veterinary care and humane slaughter.[6] If an animal is infected or suspected to have an illness, it is the responsibility of the owners to report it immediately to a practicing veterinarian for either treatment or euthanasia.[7] Depending on a multitude of factors (season, type of production system, stocking density, etc.), illness and disease can spread quickly through the herd from animal to animal.[8] Owners are expected to monitor their cattle's condition regularly for early detection and treatment, as some cattle illnesses can threaten both cattle and human health (known as zoonotic)[6] as witnessed with Mad cow disease and Tuberculosis.

On average, cattle will consume 1.4 to 4% of their body weight daily.[9] There are a range of types of feed available for these animals. The standard text in the United States, Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle, has been through eight editions over at least seventy years.[10] The 1996 seventh edition substituted the concept of metabolizeable protein for the sixth edition's crude protein.[11][12] In the 20th century, Canadian practice followed the American guidance.[13] Already in 1970, the Food and Drug Administration was regulating pharmaceutical supplements in beef cattle feed such as hormones and prophylactic antibiotics.[14]

Some animals live on pasture their entire lives and therefore only experience fresh grass, these are typically cow-calf operations in more tropical climates. Backgrounded calves and feedlot animals tend to have different diets that contain more grain than the pasture type. Grain is more expensive than pasture but the animals grow faster with the higher protein levels. Since cattle are herbivores and need roughage in their diet, silage, hay and/or haylage are all viable feed options.[15] Despite this 3/4th of the 32 pounds (14.52 kg) of feed cattle consume each day will be corn.[16] Cattle weighing 1000 lbs. will drink an average of 41 L a day, and approximately 82 L in hot weather.[17] They need a constant supply of good quality feed and potable water according to the 5 Freedoms of Animal Welfare.[18]

Most Beef cattle are finished in feedlots. The first feedlots were constructed in the early 1950s. Some of these feedlots grew so large they warranted a new designation, "Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation" (CAFO). Most American beef cattle spend the last half of their lives in a CAFO.[16]

Cattle processing
A steer that weighs 1,000 lb (450 kg) when alive makes a carcass weighing approximately 615 lb (280 kg), once the blood, head, feet, skin, offal and guts are removed. The carcass is then hung in a cold room for between one and four weeks, during which time it loses some weight as water dries from the meat. It is then deboned and cut by a butcher or packing house, the carcass would make about 430 lb (200 kg) of beef.[19] Depending on what cuts of meat are desired, there is a scale of marbled meat used to determine the quality. Marbling is the fat that is within the muscle, not around it. The more marbled a cut is, the higher it will grade and be worth more.[20]

Slaughtering of livestock has three distinct stages: preslaughter handling, stunning and slaughtering. The biggest concern is preslaughter handling, how the animal is treated before it is stunned and slaughtered. Stress at this time can cause adverse effects on the meat, water access and lower stocking densities have been allowed to minimize this. However, access to feed is restricted for 12–24 hours prior to slaughtering for ease of evisceration. Stunning is done when the animal is restrained in a chute so movement is limited. Once restrained the animal can be stunned in one of three methods: penetrating captive bolt, non-penetrating captive bolt and gunshot. Most abattoirs use captive bolts over guns. Stunning ensures the animal feels no pain during slaughtering and reduces the animals stress, therefore increasing the quality of meat. The final step is slaughtering, typically the animal will be hung by its back leg and its throat will be slit to allow exsanguination. The hide will be removed for further processing at this point and the animal will be broken down with evisceration and decapitation. The carcass will be placed in a cooler for 24–48 hours prior to meat cutting.[21]

Breeds
This list is incomplete; you can help by adding missing items with reliable sources.
Breed Origin Description
Adaptaur Australia A tropically adapted Bos ta**us breed, developed from crosses between Herefords and Shorthorns.
Afrikaner cattle South Africa Afrikaners are usually deep red or black with long spreading horns. They have the small cervico-thoracic hump typical of Sanga cattle.
Aberdeen Angus Scotland Pure black, sometimes with white at udder. Polled. Hardy and thrifty.
Australian Braford Australia Developed for resistance to ticks and for heat tolerance by crossing Brahmans and Herefords.
Australian Brangus Australia Polled breed developed by crossing Angus and Brahman
Australian Charbray Australia Developed by crossing Charolais and Brahman and selected for resistance to heat, humidity, parasites and diseases.
Barzona United States (Arizona) Developed in the high desert, inter-mountain region of Arizona.
Beefalo United States Hybrid between a cow and an American bison.
Beef Shorthorn England and Scotland Suitable for both dairy and beef.
Beefmaster United States (Texas) Developed by breeding the Brahman, Shorthorn, and Hereford.
Belgian Blue Belgium Grey roan, or white with grey on head. Extremely muscular (double muscled). Fast-growing if well-fed.
Belmont Red Australia A composite breed using Africander (African Sanga) and Hereford-Shorthorn
Belted Galloway Scotland Black with white band around middle, stocky, fairly long hair, polled. Very hardy and thrifty.
Black Hereford Great Britain A crossbreed produced by crossing a Hereford bull with Holstein or Friesian cows; used to obtain beef offspring from dairy cows. Not maintained as a separate breed, although females may be used for further breeding with other beef bulls.
Blonde d'Aquitaine France Pale brown, paler round eyes and nose. Muscular. Fast-growing if well-fed.
Bonsmara South Africa Developed from 10/16 Afrikaner, 3/16 Hereford and 3/16 Shorthorn cattle.
Boran East Africa (Ethiopia-Kenya) Usually white, with the bulls being darker (sometimes almost black).
Brahman India Large, pendulous ears and dewlaps, hump over the shoulders.
Brangus United States Developed by crossing Angus and Brahman.
British White Great Britain White body, with black (or sometimes red) ears, nose and feet; polled (hornless). Hardy and thrifty.
Caracu Brazil
Charolais France Wholly white or cream, lyre-shaped pale horns, or polled. Fast-growing if well-fed.
Chianina Italy Dual-purpose, originally large draft breed, later selected for beef.
Corriente Mexico Hardy, small, athletic, criollo-type, descended from Iberian cattle. Used in rodeo sports, noted for lean meat. Short horns, various colors, often spotted. Also called Criollo or Chinampo.
Crioulo Lageano Iberian Peninsula 400-year-old longhorn breed with around 700 individuals that live close to the plateau of Lages, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Dairy Shorthorn United Kingdom Suitable for both dairy and beef.
Dexter Ireland Very small, black or dun, dark horns. Sometimes has a dwarfing gene, leading to very short legs. Hardy and thrifty.
Droughtmaster Australia Developed by crossing Brahman cattle with taurine breeds, especially the Beef Shorthorn. Tolerant of heat and ticks.
English Longhorn England Red or brindle, with white back and belly. Very long cylindrical horns usually spreading sideways or downwards, often curving and even eventually making a circle. Medium size, hardy.
Fleckvieh Switzerland Red pied or solid red, polled or horned. Sturdy dual-purpose for beef and dairy. Formerly triple-purpose (beef, dairy and draught). Fast-growing if well-fed.
Florida Cracker cattle United States Small, criollo-type descended from cattle brought to the Southern U.S. by the Spanish conquistadors. Adapted to subtropical climate, parasite-resistant. An endangered breed.
Galloway Scotland Black, stocky, fairly long hair, polled. Very hardy and thrifty.
Gascon cattle France Grey, hardy, maternal breed. Good growth and conformation of calves. Suitable for all farming systems, bred pure or crossed with a terminal sire.
Gelbvieh Germany Red, strong skin pigmentation, polled. Superior fertility, calving ease, mothering ability, and growth rate of calves.[22]
Hanwoo Korea
Hérens Switzerland
Hereford England Red, white head, white finching on neck, and white switch.
Highland Scotland Small, stocky; black, red, dun or white. Very long coat and very long pale horns, upswept in cows and steers. Very hardy and thrifty.
Hungarian Grey Hungary Robust, easy-calving and long-lived. Horns long, curved and directed upward. Slender and tall. Well-adapted to extensive pasture systems.
Irish Moiled Ireland Red with white back and belly, or white with red ears, nose and feet. Polled. Hardy and thrifty.
Jabres Central Java, Indonesia Colors varied from light brown to dark brown with a black stripe spans from back to tail.
Japanese Shorthorn Japan A breed of small beef cattle.
Limousin Limousin and Marche regions of France Mid-brown, paler round eyes and nose. Fast-growing if well-fed.
Lincoln Red England
Lowline Australia Developed by selectively breeding small Angus cattle.
Luing Luing and surrounding Inner Hebrides, Scotland Rough coat, red-brown, polled. Bred by crossing Beef Shorthorn with Highland. Very hardy and thrifty.
Madurese East Java, Indonesia Small body, short legs, reddish yellow hair.
Maine-Anjou Anjou region in France Red-and-white pied, polled, fast-growing if well-fed.
Mocho Nacional Brazil Polled
Murray Grey South Eastern Australia Grey or silver polled cattle developed from a roan Shorthorn cow and an Angus bull. Easy-care versatile cattle that have been exported to many countries.
Nelore India Exported to Brazil, where it has become a dominant breed.
Nguni South Africa Extremely hardy breed developed by the Nguni tribes for harsh African conditions. Originally derived from the African Sanga cattle, although quite distinct. Three subgroups are recognized: Makhatini, Swazi and Pedi.
North Devon Devon, Cornwall and Somerset, England Ruby-red, white tail switch, white horns.
Piedmontese Piedmont, Italy Bred both for beef and dairy production; double-muscled. White-coloured and possessing myostatin genes.
Pineywoods Gulf Coast, US Landrace heritage endangered breed, lean, small, adapted to climate of the Deep South, disease-resistant. Short horns, various colors, often spotted.
Pinzgauer Austria Indigenous to the Pinz Valley. Dairy cattle in Europe, but well-adapted to drier landscapes of the US, Australia and South Africa, where they are kept for beef production. Solid red with very distinctive white blaze from wither, down to tail tip and underside.
Red Angus Scotland Colour variety of Angus: solid red. Polled.
Red Poll East Anglia in England Red with white switch, polled (hornless), dual-purpose.
Red Sindhi Sindh in Pakistan Red Sindhi cattle are the most popular of all zebu dairy breeds. In Pakistan, they are kept for beef production or dairy farming.
Romagnola Italy Bred primarily for beef production; often used as draught beasts in the past. White or grey with black pigmented skin and upward curving horns.
Romosinuano Colombia
Rubia Gallega Spain A breed of cattle native to the autonomous community of Galicia in north-western Spain. It is raised mainly for meat. It is distributed throughout Galicia, with about 75% of the population concentrated in the province of Lugo. The coat may be red-blond, wheaten, or cinnamon-coloured.
Salers France Red. Hardy, easy calving.
Santa Gertrudis Southern Texas, US Developed by crossing red Shorthorn and Brahman.
Simmental Western Switzerland Yellowish-brown, white head. Fast-growing if well-fed. Triple-purpose (beef, dairy and draught).
Shorthorn/Beef Shorthorn Northern England Red, red with white back and belly, or white.
Square Meater New South Wales, Australia Small, grey or silver, polled; similar to Murray Grey.
Suss*x South-east England Rich chestnut red with white tail switch and white horns. Also used for draught until the early 20th century. Hardy and thrifty.
Tabapuan Brazil
Tajima Japan Black Wagyu bred for internationally renowned beef such as Kobe and Matsuzaka.
Texas Longhorn United States Various colours, with very long, tapering, upswept horns – extending as much as 80 inches (2.0 m) tip to tip. Very hardy in dry climates. Light-muscled, so bulls often used for first-calf heifers.
Wagyū Japan Black, horned, and noted for heavy marbling (intramuscular fat deposition).
Welsh Black Wales Black, white upswept horns with black tips. Hardy.
White Park Great Britain, Ireland White, with black (or sometimes red) ears, nose and feet; white horns with dark tips. Hardy and thrifty.
Żubroń Poland Hybrid between a cow and a European bison.

Address

Adama
1000

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Cattle fattening posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to Cattle fattening:

Videos

Share

Category